Singer Solution To World Poverty Rhetorical Analysis

Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreement between experts in a discipline? Develop your answer with reference to two areas of knowledge. Given access to the same facts, disagreement is possible between experts in a discipline- such as that of human development- because conflicting claims can simultaneously be true and shared knowledge is an illusion. Though words hold different explicit and implicit meanings for each individual of humanity, to attempt to establish a more common basis of knowledge of terms used within this inquiry, I will put forward the following definitions that I will base my inquiry upon: a fact is “ a thing that is known or proved to be true” (Oxford Dictionary), a disagreement will be defined as
In his essay “Singer Solution to World Poverty” (Singer), Peter Singer, a bioethics professor and philosopher, argues for a deontological approach to ethical human development . Most individuals of first-world countries, he argues, possess a dispensable income that they should donate to human-poverty-focused charities. After stating in the article that the “New York University philosopher Peter Unger” (Singer 2) concluded from research that it merely requires a $200 donation to save a child’s life through credible overseas charity organizations, Singer goes on to say, “In the light of this conclusion, I trust that many readers will reach for the phone and donate that $200. Perhaps you should do it before reading further” (Singer 2). Singer equates possessing a disposable income to possessing the ethical obligation to