This validated the presence and influence of slaveholding office positions. The plain folk of the south made no effort to put slaveholders out of office, instead, many political contenders would attempt in winning the favor and trust of the plain folk. Slaveholding legislators protected planter’s interests and offered the impression that small farming folk interests would be defended as well. Slavery in the south could no longer be adjudged as evil or propose ideas to eradicate the practice.
Nearing the early nineteenth century, the northern and southern states beliefs on domestic slavery began to diverge. Northerners had abolished slavery and the practice itself would inevitably discontinue. However, the south had approached slave bearing to become integral to the south’s prosperity. Prompting a slave society. Economic factors, culture, politics, and the construction of New World southern society would be under the sway of …show more content…
The south however thrived in slave trade, sugar, cotton, and tobacco production. Southern economic prosperity also derived from well developed plantation systems that were operated on free labor by black slaves. In “A Content Comparison of Antebellum Plantation Records and Thomas Affleck’s Accounting Principles”, Heier introduces Affleck’s Cotton Plantation and Record Book that documented the weather conditions of the plantations and crop progress. Financial documentation was often unneeded as the majority of transactions were made annually when the crop was sold on the market and the bills that had been accumulating the year prior had been paid. “A daily basis accounting procedure would only be required if the plantation had operated throughout the year such as a lumber mill..” explains