Preview

Slide Henri

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Slide Henri
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1751-1348.htm

Henri Fayol, practitioner and theoretician – revered and reviled
Mildred Golden Pryor and Sonia Taneja
Department of Marketing and Management, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA
Abstract
Purpose – Fayol’s theories were the original foundation for management as a discipline and as a profession. Also Fayol was the first to advocate management education. Yet he has critics who revile him (or at least disparage his work) as well as followers who respect and revere him. This paper intends to enlighten today’s practitioners and academicians about the relevance and value of Fayol’s theories today. Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses Fayol’s contributions as well as the disparagement and the reverence. It compares Fayol’s work with that of Follett, Mintzberg, Taylor, and Porter. In addition, it demonstrates the original and current interpretation and application of his theories. Finally, it indicates the alignment of Fayol’s theories with strategic leadership and management. Findings – Fayol’s theories are valuable and relevant for organizational leaders because Fayol was a practitioner who documented theories that worked best for him and his co-workers. While there are those who criticize Fayol’s theories, there are many others who respect them and find them useful as academicians and as practitioners. The theory of management functions aligns well with strategic leadership and management models and theories. Originality/value – The paper is the first to integrate Fayol’s theories with a strategic leadership model. Keywords Management theory, Management history, Leadership Paper type General review

Henri Fayol – revered and reviled 489

Introduction As one of the early management practitioners who established theories and principles of management, Fayol should be of interest to students, teachers, and practitioners of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    HRM Essay

    • 1805 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4) Mindtools.com, (2014). Henri Fayol 's Principles of Management: Early Management Theory. Retrieved 26 November 2014, from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/henri-fayol.htm…

    • 1805 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fayol first publicised his ideas and discoveries (in 1916), titled ‘Administration Industrielle et Générale’; but it wasn’t until 1949 that it was translated into English. This shows us that his work was not well renowned until later on in his life, this could be due to its coincidence with both world wars, and the fact that many people were very concerned, rather than noticing Fayols work. When the Second World War had ‘finished’ there was much rebuilding and recovery to be done. As businesses began to recuperate they needed capable leaders to help bring cities back to life, this could have been when Fayols book was noticed and translated into English 4 years after the ‘end’ of World War II. His five defining roles of management, along with 14 principles of management allowed managers to initiate a fresh approach to their leadership of their company and its…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The task: Henri Fayol presented his analysis of the management function in 1916 and it has largely been…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Fayol’s legacy and to be able to generalize from it, it is necessary to familiarize reader with it. As an early management practitioner and theorist, Fayol has been credited with laying the foundations upon which contemporary management theory and praxis has been built (Pryor and Taneja, 2010). He is best remembered for a three-fold contribution to management thought.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fayol 's perspective of the overall success of an organization was to include the formulation of goals, strategies and plans and to work through others to ensure that these activities were implement. These principles also had to be supplemented and supported by discipline and anticipation (Wren, 1995; 2001). Fayol also believed that management could be taught and was concerned about improving the quality of management (Schermerhorn, Campling, Poole and Wiesner, 2004, p.98).…

    • 1748 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was one of the first theorists to define functions of management in his 1916 book “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Henri Fayol theorized that these functions were universal, and that every manager performed these functions in their daily work.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Fayol

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fayol’s influence is appreciated for all managers nowadays, even though they forget where management came out from, they know what management is, which ones are the principles and the guidelines to manage a certain group of employees. His influence is not just related to business managers, it is important for all kind of managers, beginning from a group of 3 to 4 people until group of employees up to one hundred. As teachers we are influenced for him in our daily…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Fayol’s management theories were attained through experience in the management discipline, Mintzberg’s management theories on the contrary were attained through research as an academician. Tripathi, Tripathi & Reddy (2008) argue that the two authors have differing views on management but, not competing. In short, they both have contributed valuable theories in management. Additionally, Wook Yoo, Lemak & Choi, (2006) posit that Mintzberg’s work in this discipline was to elaborate and reaffirm Fayol’s managerial concepts. However, not all authors agree to the fact that Fayol and Mintzberg’s work were complementary. Indeed, Golden Pryor & Taneja (2010) holds a different view by stating that Mintzberg’s work was very critical of Fayol’s work often disregarding Fayol’s concepts on management as ‘folklore’ in comparison to findings by Mintzberg attained through systemic research. This is a clear indication of the differing opinions various authors have on Fayol’s…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henri Fayol (Istanbul, 29 July 1841 – Paris, 19 November 1925) and his management theory have been in the greatest debate over time for its relevance for both the classic and contemporary management. To begin our exploration profoundly into the debate, we may borrow Fayol’s conclusion “without principles we are working in dark and chaos, without experience and judgment we are still working under great difficulties, even with the best principles. The principles is the lighthouse, which enable us to get our bearings, but it can only help those who know the way into port. Fayol (1949, p.42))” and other judgments of others theorists such as Forlett, Mintzbaerg, Taylor, and Porter to reveal our view of Fayol’s theory’s relevance in today’s management. Although there are limitations, disadvantages and improvements in need, Fayol’s theory has stood the test of time to be the foundation of all later theories in management. We will elaborately go through the exploration by profoundly going into Fayol’s theory of management, comparing and contrasting it with other theories under the provision of other theorists, identifying limitations and disadvantages associated, then claim our judgment that Fayol’s theory is still relevance for today’s business management.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925) was the first father of management and was a managing director for a French mining company. He was seen as a critical contributor to classical school of management theory. His French management theorist believed that management is an acquired skill that can be taught where human skills is apply to system, not systems apply to people. He describes management as functions based on his personal observation and experience in the work force, while Henry Mintzberg has different opinion.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One such author, Henry Fayol (1841 – 1925), known as the father of modern management, was Europe’s most distinguished management author and the first to develop a general theory of management. He maintained that management is “to forecast and to plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control”. The basis of his theory is that organizational activities can be classified into technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting or managerial activities.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    universal principles to achieve ‘one best way’ of management. Henri Fayol emphasised ‘command and control’ and…

    • 2819 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics