Preview

Small ClaimProcedures

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Small ClaimProcedures
( Small Claims Procedure)
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The Small Claims Procedure was set up in order to handle disputes between individuals or an individual making a claim against a business in a cheap, easy, and quick manner where the amounts of the claims not exceeding RM 10,000.00. It had been stated under Section 92 of Subordinate Courts Act 1948 where Second Class Magistrate shall have only jurisdiction to try original actions or suits of a civil nature where the Plaintiff seeks to recover a debt or liquidated demand in money payable by the defendant with or without interest, not exceeding RM10,000.00.1
According to Augustine Paul J, the Lordship in Tan Ah Chai v. Loke Jee Yah,2 ‘‘Small claims procedure is to serve as an inexpensive, simplified and speedy mode of prosecuting a claim which is small without legal representation. There is a purpose in denying legal representation in such cases. It has been said that this is to ensure that the objects of such denial are not reduced in value. Though this procedure would therefore serve the needs of a litigant of insufficient means it is not solely targeted at achieving that result. Its underlying purpose is to ensure that there is a balance between the claim made and the expense incurred in pursuing that claim.’ '

2.2 LIMIT OF CLAIM In Malaysia, small claim proceedings are heard in the Second Class Magistrate Court. The procedure initially applied to recovery of debts of not more than RM 3000.00 under Order 54 of the Subordinate Courts Rules 1980, however, since 2012, the rules of subordinate court and high courts have changed and now known as Rules of Courts 2012. Under these new rules, the amount increased to RM 5,000.00. Later, starting from March 1st 2013, the amount had increased to RM 10,000.00 as accordance to the amendment stated under Subordinate Court Act 1948.
It is mandatory to bring the claim that is less than RM10,000.00 according to Section 92 of Subordinate Courts Act 1948. As in the case of



References: Acts: 1. Subordinate Court Act 1948 2. Rules of Court 2012 Websites: 1. Jumin, R. B. (2011, MAY 12). LATAR BELAKANG. Retrieved JULY 16, 2013, from Laman Web Rasmi Mahakamah Negeri Sembilan: http://nsembilan.kehakiman.gov.my/?q=node/350 2. (2013, August 2). Retrieved August 5, 2013, from MalaysiaFactBook : http: //malaysiafactbook.com /Small_ Claims_Court 3. (2013, August 2). Retrieved August 5, 2013, from MalaysiaFactBook : http: //malaysiafactbook.com /Small_ Claims_Court 4. Izuan, K. (2013, March 9). Small Claim Court. Retrieved August 5, 2013, from Legal in Malaysia: http://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=http://legal-malaysia.blogspot.com/2013/03/small-claim-court-do-it-yourself-diy.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The form that you have to fill out to file a small claim is called an SC100, SC standing for small claims. After you fill out this form you turn it into the clerk in the court that you are choosing to file the claim. Once you have filed the papers with the clerk the next step is serving the defendant of your case. Neither you nor any witness involved in your case is allowed to serve the papers. Once the papers have been…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Applied Management Project

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages

    17. Tsang (1999), “Law society Gazette-Focus ' '. Available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/archives/1999-10-08/00000012.html, (Accessed: 27th July, 2010)…

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Small Claims Trial Essay

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I was overwhelmed with excitement, as I was about to witness my first small claims trial in the reputable small claims court located at 7765 Hurontario Street, Brampton, which was repetitively used as a source in the small claims textbook. To my surprise there were two buildings, the large one being the criminal court while the smaller one was the small claims court. These seem to be the main cause of confusion for many people including myself. This is because the address for small claims on our books was actually for the criminal courts instead. I failed to understand why they could not create a way to distinguish them. When I finally arrived at the small claims court, I was enthusiastic to see the endless amount of people…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 8 ]. Justice Hamidul Haq, Trial of Civil Suits and Criminal Cases (Dhaka, 2010)416.…

    • 5042 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Small Claims Courts

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Small Claims courts are a crucial aspect of the Canadian Legal system that could even be relevant to you one day. Small Claims courts are were created to try and give the average Joe a cheap, simple way to settle any type of arguments involving property or finances, without necessarily having to know a whole lot about law. You do not need to know many legal terms and the case usually consists of you telling your story for the judge to make a decision. It is a court that was not designed for lawyers and matters are handled more independently, although it isn't against the rules to obtain help from lawyers inside or outside of court. Initially made in order to settle disputes using as little money as possible, there are certain limits to how much a person can claim for regarding compensation or damages. Although the limit may change from place to place the standard maximum you can sue for in small claims court is $10,000.00.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    court report

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a) The plaintiff, MavCap, filed the case against Mobifusion, Inc. In exchange for a securing three million dollar investment from MavCap; in 2010, Mobifusion agreed in the Note Purchase Agreement that MavCap could have a seat on the board of directors of Mobifuson and that the MavCap, through the Board, would be allowed to approve any expenditures of its investment over RM 100,000 (about $32,790). However, in Sep 2012, Mobifusion decided to end run its contractual obligations and cut MavCap out of the approval process by making daily funs transfer just RM 1,000 (about $299.32) under the threshold for which MavCap’s approval was required, but in combination such daily transfer greatly excced the RM 100,000 approval threshold.…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pack

    • 93426 Words
    • 374 Pages

    SECTION A B CONTENT A QUICK GUIDE TO LITIGATION RESOURCES PRE ACTION ISSUES 1. CPR RULES a) Part 1 2. SKELETON STRUCTURES AND CHECKLISTS a) Initial Letter of Advice to the client C COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS AND STATEMENTS OF CASE 1. CPR RULES a) PD 5A b) Part 6 and PD 6A c) Part 7 and PD 7A d) Part 12 and PD 12 e) Part 15 and PD 15 f) Part 16 and PD 16 g) Part 17 and PD 17 h) Part 18 and PD 18 i) Part 20 j) Part 22 and PD 22 2. SKELETON STRUCTURES AND CHECKLISTS a) Statements of case - checklists b) Statements of truth – how to draft D ALLOCATION, CASE MANAGEMENT, DIRECTIONS AND EVIDENCE 1. CPR RULES a) Part 29 and PD 29 b) Part 31 and PD 31A c) Part 32 and PD 32 d) Part 35 and PD 35 e) Protocol for Instructing Experts E TRIAL, COSTS AND ENFORCEMENT 1. CPR RULES a) Part 44 b) Part 45.1 to 45.6 203-214 215-221 119-132 133-144 145-166 167-176 177-202 11-18 19-50 51-60 61-70 71-76 77-88 89-92 93-98 99-104 105-112 113-116 117 7-8 9-10 PAGES 5-6…

    • 93426 Words
    • 374 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If all parties do not fully settle their claims or you decide to arbitrate your claim without mediation, you may submit your claim to FINRA. In arbitration, an impartial person or panel hears the presentations of the parties, evaluates the evidence and decides how the matter will be resolved. When you choose arbitration to resolve your dispute, you forego the opportunity to have the same matter decided by a court of law because an arbitration award at this forum is final and binding. This Uniform Forms Guide provides information for you and all parties involved in arbitration proceedings. The guide explains how to file an initial Statement of Claim and other pleadings. It also…

    • 7680 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Equity and Trusts

    • 2551 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The rules governing this area have been settled after the Civil Law Act 1956 (CLA) came into force on 7 April 1956 for West Malaysia and 1 April 1972 for East Malaysia. According to S4(3) CLA, if the assignment fulfils the criteria of a statutory assignment provided in that section, the assignee may sue the…

    • 2551 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trespass to person

    • 2470 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Norchaya Talib, Law of Tort in Malaysia (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell Asia, Kuala Lumpur 2006)…

    • 2470 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By a letter of offer dated 23.12.1999 the plaintiff granted to Precision Tube Product (M) Sdn Bhd (the 1st defendant) various banking facilities amounting to RM13,960,000.00. The banking facilities were secured by a legal charge over a factory owned by the 1st defendant, a debenture over all assets of the 1st defendant and a guarantee by its 2 directors Jamer Singh (the 2nd defendant) and Tejinder Raj Singh (the 3rd defendant). By a letter of offer dated 28.4.2000 the plaintiff granted to the 1st defendant an additional banking facility of RM1,590,000.00. By a letter of offer dated 29.6.2000 the plaintiff granted to the 1st defendant a further banking facility of RM7,450,000.00. On 23.8.2000 the plaintiff and the 1st defendant entered into a Facility Agreement relating to the aforesaid banking facilities. On 28.8.2003 the plaintiff restructured the various banking facilities granted to the 1st defendant on the security of a supplementary facility agreement which was executed on 2.9.2003. According to the Supplementary Facility Agreement the existing…

    • 2572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    law memo

    • 23401 Words
    • 94 Pages

    Kio to her place of study at Peninsula Plaza each weekday by MRT via the…

    • 23401 Words
    • 94 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case digest

    • 6534 Words
    • 27 Pages

    SMC collected the said amount from respondent UCPB under its insurance contract. Respondent on the other hand, as a subrogee of SMC, brought a suit against petitioner in RTC, Makati City. On December 20, 1995, the RTC rendered judgment finding petitioner liable for the damage to the shipment. The decision was affirmed by the CA.…

    • 6534 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judgement

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is a claim between PT Soonlee Metalindo Perkasa vs. Synergy Shipping PTE LTD. It is taken by High court of Singapore in 27 July 2007. It is determined by Judge Judith Prakash.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Malaysian Tort Trespass

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The liability involved is trespass to person which consists of assault, battery and false imprisonment. The first issue is whether the act of Alice showing her fist to Robert constituted to assault.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics