Unlike the couple in the previous story, Terri has moved on from this event, though it still sticks with her enough to retell as she shares drinks with her husband and another couple. The story ends similarly, but with a different tone. It is suggested that they continue to sit together for a while after the story ends, sitting in each other's company, “...not one of [them] moving, not even when the room went dark.” (Carver p 154) The primary difference here is that the two couples had plans to leave for dinner after finishing the gin, whereas the baker and the parents “...did not think of leaving.” (Carver p 29) It seems that Carver’s characters do not indulge in this type of connection as much when not faced with difficulty. Though their conversation was, on the surface, a discussion of the nature of love in drunken logic, it seemed that they all had the opportunity to share in one another’s life experiences without outside influence, and did not truly desire to leave when it seemed to be
Unlike the couple in the previous story, Terri has moved on from this event, though it still sticks with her enough to retell as she shares drinks with her husband and another couple. The story ends similarly, but with a different tone. It is suggested that they continue to sit together for a while after the story ends, sitting in each other's company, “...not one of [them] moving, not even when the room went dark.” (Carver p 154) The primary difference here is that the two couples had plans to leave for dinner after finishing the gin, whereas the baker and the parents “...did not think of leaving.” (Carver p 29) It seems that Carver’s characters do not indulge in this type of connection as much when not faced with difficulty. Though their conversation was, on the surface, a discussion of the nature of love in drunken logic, it seemed that they all had the opportunity to share in one another’s life experiences without outside influence, and did not truly desire to leave when it seemed to be