Smoking in Public: Ban

Smoking in Public: Smoking Ban The argument on Smoking tobacco and other method of smoking use in public should be ban. The use of smoking tobacco has number one concerns to nonsmokers have health effects on people who choose to smoke in a public place or private places. The study argues that Americans died every year from harmful effects and other diseases related to smoking. This habit of smoking indicates that smoking cigarette disturb non-smokers or secondhand smoking. Also, contributes to health risks. Practically, secondhand smokers have suffered from health problem in which includes adults and children. A study explains the reason for a definite ban on smoking in public areas. The argument of this paper is that smoking in public places should be limited and completely banned for the benefit of people’s health. The study showed many disadvantages when people smoke and the health implications of exposure to tobacco smoke. Researchers argued millions of Americans children and adults died from exposed to secondhand smoke in public places, workplaces and homes “Tobacco use is preventable death and disability in the world today (WHO, 2003”). The boundaries and habitual approach is the idea that found behaviors involve the usefulness of the smoking ban. An example, public reason through education “As demonstrated by survey results negative attitudes toward a smoking ban also represented within the Polish society (Borowiec, Lignowka, & Makowska, 2013”). The study showed unconcerned to support for smoking habits that a community should focus on the solution associated with issues of smoking use of an intervention efforts. The World Health Organization argued “Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and disability in the world” and stated “there are an estimated 1.3 billion smokers worldwide. This number is expected to increase to 1.7 billion by 2020 (WHO, 2003”).
The study also shows that many people accepted and recognized the meaning of health life of “Polish society” that appeared to turn with the result of smoking. People used positive attitudes towards the smoking ban and members seem to conduct decisions and control the situation better. Further, the authors argued that restrictions and usual attitudes showed need for additional activities that required moving forward in order to the effectiveness of the smoking ban. An example is the public alertness on the ground through education “As demonstrated by survey results negative attitudes towards a smoking ban represented with the Polish society (Borowiec, 2013”).
The study results show that casual smoking exposure causes heart diseases and others illness “Medical research carried out by governments and health organizations around the world are all unanimous on the harms and danger smoking (Wasin et al., 2012”).
Smoking habit in a public place should be banned and considered the health risks and causes of death “In 2001, more than a quarter (27 per cent) of all adults aged 16 and over admitted to smoking, and they risked premature death and disability from coronary heart diseases, cancer, respiratory diseases and complication in diabetes II and other chronic illness (Statistics on Smoking, 2003.”)
As a conclusion, this argumentative paper of smoking in public places affects numerous people’s health and causes death should be ban argues that “the ‘supportive’ attitude can be characterized not only by total support for the smoking ban in public places but also by insistence on the need for its extension (Borowiec, 2013”)

References
Borowiec, A. Lignowka, I. & Makowska, M. (2013). What can Public Endorsement a
Smoking Ban Policy Mean? Preliminary Findings from a qualitative Study, 21(3): 128-133. Vahidi, R.G.
Ezzati M and Lopez A (2003). Estimates of Global Mortality Attribution in Smoking 2000, the Lancet, Pp. 847-852.
Statistics on Smoking (2003). Statistical Bulletin, Office of National Statistics and Development of Health, England, p. 21.
Wasin et al., tobacco Use as a Blobal. Gomal University Journal of Research, 28(1). June 2012.
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Treaty (2003). World Health

References: Borowiec, A. Lignowka, I. & Makowska, M. (2013). What can Public Endorsement a Smoking Ban Policy Mean? Preliminary Findings from a qualitative Study, 21(3): 128-133. Vahidi, R.G. Ezzati M and Lopez A (2003). Estimates of Global Mortality Attribution in Smoking 2000, the Lancet, Pp. 847-852. Statistics on Smoking (2003). Statistical Bulletin, Office of National Statistics and Development of Health, England, p. 21. Wasin et al., tobacco Use as a Blobal. Gomal University Journal of Research, 28(1). June 2012. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Treaty (2003). World Health