As suggested by Ethan Nadelmann, prohibitionist policies have resulted in ‘’serious social and economic costs’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 444). Besides the costs in increased crime, nearly $20 billion in taxpayers’ money have been spent on DEA programs and others. Not only that, prohibitionist policies is the primary reason that drugs have become more concentrated, since they would take up less space and reduce the visibility of their trafficking (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 447). While the costs seems to outweigh the advantages when it comes to prohibitionist policies, I still think prohibition would be a better option than legalization and decriminalization. Because at the end of the day, I’m not sure if our country is ready for a society where illegal drugs become commodities. Besides, it is literally impossible for our government to systematically regulate and control the amount of drugs on
As suggested by Ethan Nadelmann, prohibitionist policies have resulted in ‘’serious social and economic costs’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 444). Besides the costs in increased crime, nearly $20 billion in taxpayers’ money have been spent on DEA programs and others. Not only that, prohibitionist policies is the primary reason that drugs have become more concentrated, since they would take up less space and reduce the visibility of their trafficking (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 447). While the costs seems to outweigh the advantages when it comes to prohibitionist policies, I still think prohibition would be a better option than legalization and decriminalization. Because at the end of the day, I’m not sure if our country is ready for a society where illegal drugs become commodities. Besides, it is literally impossible for our government to systematically regulate and control the amount of drugs on