Moreover, these artists reflect on a set of principles underlying their graffiti works, reflecting on the social contexts in cites and the public spaces. In addition to this, they have been seized by legal authority, and accused of supporting refusals to social issues and ideas, by producing graffiti writings, tags and works, which reflects on the criminalization of a rule maintained by the authority. (Young 2012, 297) In Alison Young’s research (2012, 298) , she suggests the ways in which graffiti artists are contrived to state a combination of statements in order to debate on how they get accused by the law by representing social and political issues in public space. She suggest that one of the ways is how they hide the act of graffiti writing from the public in order not to be seen or be criminalized or accused by the law. Alison (2012, 298) also claims that “graffiti centres on the ‘tag’ (a name adopted by a graffiti writer and repeated in variety of forms...”. Alison also suggests that most of the graffiti artists have the desire to work on private areas without permission, in order to cause an effect on that place. (Young, 2012, …show more content…
Irvine (2012, 1) suggests that since 1990s, street artists such as Banksy and Swoon have became a part of the present and contemporary art practices, which interpret and prescribe social and political issues through visual art in the public space. He claims that “A useful differentiator for street artists is the use of walls as mural space” (Irvine, 2012, 6). This quote suggests that most artists use walls to create their murals in them in different ways such as graffiti of images, paintings or