Preview

Social Class Affect On Children

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Class Affect On Children
Their Future is in Our Hands

When it comes down to raising children, social class does play a role how children are brought up. Even though it plays a role, it does not determine what the outcome of the child will be. I believe that the parenting style of a parent is what truly determines how a child will blossom and succeed in life. I personally have experience with the middle class social class but know plenty of people from lower class families. Although Lareau does have a point, her observations do not fully add up and she did not provide a significant amount of evidence. Based on my experience and other gathered evidence, Lareau’s argument that middle and upper class parents use concerted cultivated and lower class parents use natural growth is inaccurate because love and discipline are the key factors in how children will thrive in the future.

Lareau started her social experiment with observing 88 families and then provided in-depth observations on 12 families (Lareau 2003). Based on the gathered observations, she argues that a parent’s class and race impact their children’s life experience and that class plays as a significant role in the way that they raise their children. She discussed 2 major groups which are the middle and upper class and then the lower and working class. The upper and middle class parent’s practice concerted cultivation while the lower and working class parent’s practice natural growth.

In Lareau’s book, the first class’s, the upper and middle class, style of parenting is marked by parent’s effort to foster their children’s throughout reasoning and other social skills. They tend to do this during the course of leisure activities and negotiations between the parent and child. Within concerted cultivation there is a lot of expressing feelings and discussion is hallmark (Lareau 2003). Middle class and upper class parents want to ensure that their children have certain experiences so they can succeed later in life,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    That would not be her only distinction between all the children in her book. She would also write about the differences in vocabulary, institutional intervention, and educational awareness of the families. Except, child-rearing would act as giant umbrella for which she could use for comparison and contrast because of vastly different those two child-rearing lifestyles were. For example, Garrett Talinger’s was raised by means of concerted cultivation, and usually had his schedule pretty jam-packed with activities during the entire week. On the flip side, Tyrec Taylor was raised with achievement in natural growth, and was often left to his own devices to try to entertain himself. Lareau never takes a stance in her book as to which she believes was better. Instead, she took a more objective approach saying both styles had their advantages and disadvantages. Concerted cultivation children tend to have a stronger sense for vocabulary, and achieving a sense of entitlement. The disadvantages for them is exhaustion, due to their heavy schedules. Achievement of natural growth tended to be more autonomous and creative, due to need to entertain themselves because they were not enrolled in extra activities. The downsides for those children is that they tended to obtain a sense of constraint when it came to institutions. While both styles look equal, the follow-up interviews show a different outlook. Lareau would end her book with a brief overview of the limitations and possible effects that social class, and child-rearing styles had on children. Before I go onto to talking about that, I am going to focus on some problems with her…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parents must balance the effects culture, time and class have. Oftentimes, we find the influence of these to vary – increasing and decreasing their sway on us. Griego believes…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, some do obtain success due to their upbringing. Child-rearing practices are different in each background. For example, parents from different social class backgrounds differ on how exceptional their kids will be in school. Gladwell discusses that the reason why poor kids do not excel in school is the time they prepare studying outside of school, which they put forth nothing. In addition to, kids from wealthier backgrounds are encouraged to read, express their emotions, and ask questions. Involved parents and parents who are not involved is the key difference that leads to an individual’s success. Upper class parents talk to their kids more and critically provide them a set of skills to endure. Gladwell asserts, “But social savvy is knowledge. It’s a set of skills that have to be learned. It has to come from somewhere, and the place where we seem to get these kinds of attitudes and skills is from our families” (102). An example from the book is Alex Williams and Katie Brindle. Williams came from a wealthy background and when school was not is session his parents were actively engaging him in activities. Because his parents believed in concerted cultivation, which is a style of parenting, that attempts to promote their children’s talents; by interesting them in activities. His parents took him to museums, enrolled him to special programs, and he attended summer camp. His parents encouraged him to read books when he was bored. This style of parenting allowed him to excel in his skills. Moving on to Katie Brindle, a poor upbringing for her. Her mother didn’t have the means to provide summer camp for her or provide her any special classes. When she was bored there were no books for her to read. She was provided a carefree summer with friends and the great outdoors. Thus, was the reason she was behind in her skills. Williams…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    She had interest in parenting styles, racial issues, and social class. She conducted a research on parenting styles, it was called concerted cultivation vs. natural growth. She and her researchers studied over 80 families. Lareu instructed the families to pay attention to their kids. To spend time with them when they had free time. She called this strategy “the family dog.” Annette discovered that the working class parents pursed an approach called “accomplishment of natural growth.” Whereas middle class families used an approach called “concerted cultivation.” The working class family, had their children exposed mostly to the outdoors, more often you would find them playing with their friends from their neighborhood or siblings. And as for parents in the working class, they spent more time working and waiting for their transportation, they didn’t have time to spend with their children. Working class parents also tended to be more authoritarian. These kids didn’t question anyone with authority. For example, their teachers, principals, or anyone with a higher position. These children were described as quiet, mellow, and uninvolved. They called this parenting style “accomplishment of natural growth.” Furthermore, children in the middle class were completely different from the working class. Their families had more time to spend with them whereas working class didn’t. These families treated their children like “the family dog.” They were accompanied by their parents to their appointment, sport practices, and school activities. These parents made their kids go from one activity to the other. The children in the middle class families were more involved in after school activities and outside clubs. These parents adapted a strategy called “concerted cultivation.” As a result these children questioned authority more and were less quiet. Annette gives an example of this. She describes a little boy named Alex that comes from…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea that working-class children will most likely under-achieve due to a lack of culture, also known as cultural deprivation, refers to children lacking the norms, values, beliefs, skills and knowledge that a society would regard as important and necessary. The attributes that these children should know and learn are, in most cases, taught by their parents and are passed to the next generation through socialisation. All children are socialised differently, and the social class of the parent has a huge impact on the child and may affect their achievement in education. According to the cultural deprivation theory, some working-class parents fail to communicate and instil the appropriate norms, values, beliefs, skills and knowledge needed for educational success. However, there are other factors that can determine how well a child does within education. For example, material deprivation, cultural capital and economic capital can also have an impact on how well some children will attain, therefore cultural deprivation is not the only factor and may not be the most important reason to why working-class children under-achieve.…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The socialisation starts within the family and relatives where babies are imposed to four processes identified by Oakley as: manipulation, canalization, verbal appellations and differential activity exposure. Through these, parents teach their children things such as eating, dressing, talking and behaving suitably (manners, socialising with other kids) in order to help them successfully function in society later in life. Sometimes, parents tend to hold hegemonic stereotyped views of typical characteristics of boys and girls which are used as norms when socialising their children, in order to help them get accepted within the society – boys and girls are expected to behave in certain ways. Feminists would argue that because of such socialisation, women have a worse start when growing up (eg. always has been taught to be emotional and obey men) and therefore possess less power and opportunities in the society. This well explains the process of socialisation, however, Marxists would disagree, as they believe that it does not matter what gender you are – their view would be that social class is the most important factor that influences the process of socialisation. This suggests that if a girl or a boy has been immersed in upper class’ culture, due to the parents’ habitus, both of the genders would have equal chances to gain power and status in society through their natural confidence, private-schooling, parent’s contacts etc. This is supported by Bourdieu’s cultural capital which suggests that being brought up by the parents with the education, knowledge, language, attitudes and values possessed by the upper-class - will have an impact on the process of primary socialisation because, as Marxists believe, social class is the most crucial…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Class is a fundamental aspect in society and can be found in all societies around the world. Aspects such as education, health, wealth, where you live, what do you do with yourself all contribute to where you as a member of society fit in. If you are a student attending a private school, living in Toorak with very wealthy parents you would be considered part of the ‘upper class’ in society, where people would generally look more highly of…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A social class background has a very powerful influence on a child’s chances of success in the education system. The children that are from a middle class background will normally perform better than the working class.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to raising a child, families fall into the category of either emphasizing concerted cultivation or accomplishment of natural growth. In Annette Lareau’s first chapter of, “Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life,” she talks a bit about the different families she researched and the various methods the parents are categorizing in about raising their child. Through her observations of these families, she noticed middle-class families practice a particular parenting style known as concerted cultivation, where the parents believe they must promote the growth and development of their child’s abilities and skills. These types of parents often push their kids to join a variety of activities and are very active in their child’s…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concerted cultivation is a middle class child educational technique parent’s use on a child to improve their children’s talents. Middle class parents do this through scheduled activities. Concerted cultivated parents also practice the language of reasoning with their child. The parents believe that their children have the right to find an agreement with each parent. Middle class parents also take more consideration with authorities that are connected with their children. Children from concerted cultivation households spend much time in after school classes or programmers such as taking dance lessons or being on a football team. Parents in these families are very involved in their children’s free time, transporting them from activity to activity, which, often, some moms are called “soccer moms” for the children who play soccer. Concerted cultivation parents also emphasize negotiation, encouraging their children to question authority figures, including themselves. As a result, children from concerted cultivation homes tend to be less intimidated by authority, such as teachers, and attain a sense of “power”, believing they are “worthy of adult interest” and can “customize” their environment.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Everything in society, not only has an impact but it shapes the individual as well. There are many inequalities that individuals face based on their: race, socioeconomic statuses, beliefs, and because of their lack sufficient knowledge. The way one raises a child has a huge impact; however, social class has a tremendous effect on the child because that is what allows the child to experience opportunities. If the child comes from a middle class, working class or poor family there is already inequality being present unconsciously because they are exposed to different culture, system, and different capital. For instance, In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life, Annette Lareau analyzes how social statuses impacts parenting.…

    • 2261 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: Cultural repertoire consists of components that may influence the way a parent raises a child. Middle class child rearing, the book asserts, generally conforms to the logic of concerted cultivation, according to which parents view it as their duty to actively foster the development of their children’s potential skills and talents. By contrast, the book notes, working class and poor child rearing conforms to a logic of the accomplishment of natural growth, according to which parents assume that if they provide their children with love, feed and clothe them, and keep them safe, the children will grow and thrive spontaneously.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unequal Childhoods

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Annette Lareau invites her readers to a new perspective of child-rearing, where people are not just individual human beings, but rather class subjects. Her book, Unequal Childhoods provides the best means to demonstrate her views, via following the lives of twelve completely socially and culturally diversified families that had children around the ages of eight and ten, regardless gender and race. Lareau introduces two core parenting styles that are believed to affect a child’s learning in different ways. The first core theory presented in her book is “Concerted Cultivation” which, according to Lareau, is interpreted as a parenting pattern that enforces a child’s talent by allowing specific activities in his or her life that will encourage the child to unleash and further develop his or her talents. The second theory is based on a completely different parenting style, called “Natural Growth, “ where parents do not interfere with or disturb their child’s natural development and allow their children to enjoy their childhood without implementing any particular activities in their child’s life. The second theory is commonly seen among families in the poor and/or working class. Lareau concentrated exclusively on families where parents were employees, rather than self-employed workers or employers and also families that were not involved in the labor market and supported by the public assistance; moreover, families that belonged in the working-class or middle-class category.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    social class

    • 879 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is an analysis of a television show that has a social class theme. Tyler Perry House of Payne is a comedy series about a multigenerational, working class family who experiences all of life’s struggles dealing with faith, love, and humor. Three generations living under one house roof. The family has six people living in the house which includes three adults, one teen who attends college, and two kids. The lead of the family is Curtis Payne and his wife Ella Payne. They have a son who attends college name Calvin Payne. The television show is about C.J. and his family moving into the house with his aunt and uncle. His aunt and uncle have very different ideas about raising kids. The social theme of this show is the life of a working family that has many trials and tribulations, but through all the heart breaks and crisis they still love each other and work together as one. The movie can make you laugh and touch your heart at the same time.…

    • 879 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Webster dictionary, social class is defined as a group of people who share economic and social status. Social class is separated by one’s wealth and how they present themselves. James W. Loewen once said that “social class is probably the most important variable in society. From womb to tomb, it correlates with all other social characteristics of people.” Here he is stating that social class is something a person will have to deal with for from birth to death; it will develop a person and their unique characteristics (compound sentence). Social standings are ubiquitous, which makes the idea of this quote so intriguing. As the world becomes more complex, the division between social classes becomes more apparent…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays