Social Conflict Theory Paper

To explain the theory of this article I will use the theoretical perspective of conflict. In this article it gives details about the racial and ethnics of injustice. The theory of this article is to let the reader know that society is not fair. If the White respondents of this article would come to the same agreement of the Hispanics and African Americans about injustice, then the crime and experiences would be excluding in the world that we live in today. However, in the article, it also explains that the Hispanics that have had contact with previous negative encounters of criminal justice will distinguish more of the injustice than African Americans with almost the same type of prior criminal justice.
While using the social conflict theoretical
perspective, I have chosen the two assumptions that helped me determine why I will deliberate the source of this article. My first deliberation is on Hispanics and the reason they are the largest minority in the United States, and the racial and ethnics of injustice. Hispanics now are intolerant of unfairness by the criminal justice system, although law enforcement will cooperate with Hispanics more often if they are political and assertively aware of their likelihood. Secondly, my conflict theory on this article would be the racial and ethnic division hypothesis. “Hagan et al. (2005) argued that African Americans and Hispanics experience more injustice than Whites because of their relative lack of social, political, economic, and cultural power” (Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 2008), which gives reasons why the differences of each race and ethnicity are now segregated in different communities.
With my first assumption of this theory I will give more knowledge on the Hispanics.
Besides the Hispanics being the minority, it comes to the indication that their perception and construction to explore justice and injustice ways of living is impossible. Some interactions of injustice issues are being emerged to the Hispanics using “illegal immigration, border control, and border safety, especially along the United States and Mexico border” (Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 2008). The Hispanic organizations were protesting against the restrictions of the justice system and the federal legislative system, with the protest being opposed in cities worldwide, if passed then penalties for illegal immigrants would be classified for illegal immigration. In order to control illegal immigration, the government needs to have more border control and/or security to increase the attention to businesses that may want to employ illegal immigrants. I feel that this assumption is compatible to the conflict theory because the privileges of Hispanics are exploited from the Whites and the African Americans. This theory helped release the human capacities by perplexing the power to keep the burden of other groups
down.
With my second assumption that determines the conflict theory, I will explain more about the racial-ethnic division hypothesis.
The divisions of each race, the African Americans and Hispanics have separated themselves from each other by living in low poverty areas which cause both races to be intact with more illegal crimes. While living in these types of environment, both Hispanics and African Americans are forced to purchase things less expensive than the Whites. Since the disadvantages of each race are less likely for Whites, this causes them have a personal contact with more federal agents, such as the police. “Comparative conflict theory further argued that the “frame of reference” used by African Americans and Hispanics is one of social and economic disadvantage, whereas Whites view the behavior of the criminal justice system from more of a race-neutral perspective” (Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 2008). The injustice that is perceived by Whites of African Americans and Hispanics were ruled to have come at an early age through the public of which they grew up, and being able to stay interacted with agents. These conflicting results are in suggestion to the conflict theory and why I chose this theoretical
perspective.
One of the strengths I would use to predict conflict theory of this article is the ability of how each and every American is treated and the way they are judged. The power that each African American and Hispanic have had in the past are fortuitously perceived. Every Hispanic has had an opportunity to become legal instead of crossing the border and befitting an illegal immigrant, which causes them to accommodate themselves in poverty. The conflict theory of the society that Hispanics live in is organized to make themselves feel comfortable and make the Whites difficult to understand why. The African Americans are not as different as the Hispanics, although most African Americans are perceived differently; they have some of same similarities, but are seen more by federal agencies. African Americans try their hardest to have less observation as possible on them. Most African Americans keep to themselves, if not in the category of the corrupted African Americans. They have more conflicts with their own race instead of coming to agreement with a solution. These are some of the strengths of many that I think predicts the social conflict theoretical perspective.
Since there are plenty of weaknesses about this article, to understand the meaning of what it is trying to explain, I have to let the conflict theory speak for itself. One of the weaknesses that the Hispanics have gone through was the social environment; living in hardship is not what everyone wants in life. But if you are an illegal immigrant and you know that you have no business in the United States then you have to accept the consequences that come with it. Being Hispanic is more secretive to some individuals because they do not want the census to know exactly what race they are. “Research has indicated that on the 2000 census, 97 percent of the individuals who choose “some other race” reported that they were Hispanic” (Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 2008). Some of the weaknesses for African Americans are more quickly to come by more than the Hispanics. African Americans are seen by the police as trouble makers, racial profiling, and even police brutality. The studies have shown that African Americans “were nearly seven times greater than the odds of Whites” (Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 2008). Using the social conflict theoretical perspective, I am gladly to come to the conclusion of the weaknesses of Hispanics and African Americans.
While doing this assignment I have learned a lot about the key contrasts between the social order and the conflict theory. It has also been great to study what the world sees of the racial and ethnic perceptions of injustice. I have absorbed a great deal of information about the Hispanics, African Americans, and the Whites being different and the same in many ways.

References
Elsevier Ltd. (2008). Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice 36 (2008)