Preview

Social Construction Of Crime Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Construction Of Crime Essay
Crime is an unpredictable and a unexplainable violent thing. Many groups that have different interests who seek in promoting in using their own resources to claim their issue is called social construction of crime. For example, Gary LaFree (1989) conducted a study that was based on the study of sexual assault. He found out that men who are accused of sexual assault are then less likely to be convicted of rape only if their victims have had any sort of a bad reputation or an unsuitable living conditions. Yet, the report of the assault was not reported correctly and all of these factors have no legal definition of what the rape consisted of. However, the way in how rape was being explained is called socially constructed. Being socially constructed …show more content…
Conflict perspective of the law is based on the development of benefit to some groups to show the damage of other groups. A source of group conflict is political power because the people who are in control of the money, socially, and politically are the ones who consider what is punishable and as well to what extent the punishment will go. Finally, the consensus perspective of the law is a position where it reflects on a broad decision that is made, based on which kinds of behavior should be punished by the state. Based on the consensus perspective it focuses more on discussion and compromising between lawmakers, yet it is not based on the side of social and political power. In looking, at both the conflict and consensus perspectives it is best to look at how to view the criminal law that involves the passage of the law. Also, another thing the we would need to look at is to what extent the people of the society agree with the existing laws. There are some laws that reflect on the consensus perspective such as murder and rape because are usually referred to as harmful acts that many people believe they should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Examine the various search patterns investigators can use to systematically search crime scenes for evidence.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two most common models that are used to determine which acts are considered criminal are the consensus model and the conflict model. The consensus model is a model in which the majority of the people within that society share the same basic values and beliefs. If anyone in that society deviates from the established norms of that society and their behavior threatens the well being of the group, than they must be punished. Consensus means majority, so that means that the majority of the people within that group must agree what is considered right and what is considered wrong in order to determine what is to be deemed criminal or not. So when that society’s…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 21 Crimes Essay

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Use each key term below in a sentence that shows the meaning of the term.…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social construction refers to the way in which crime and deviance in society might be created and shaped by society and social institutions. This can occur in a number of different ways. For example, they can influence public perception and definitions of what establishes crime and deviance, deviants or non-deviants. They can also influence the amount of crime in society by amplifying it therefore clamping down on it. They can add pressure for changes in legislation which can then alter definitions of crime and can criminalise activities previously regarded as legal. They can also influence the extent, trends and patterns of recorded crime in how they operate.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The consensus model and the conflict model are the two ways society use to determine if an act is criminal. The consensus model is saying that society agrees with the views of right and wrong (Schmalleger, 2011). Consensus model is also showing society in agreement that anything that can cause harm to others is a criminal act (Schmalleger, 2011). The conflict model says that groups in power decide what a criminal act is (Schmalleger, 2011). The consensus model works together to make the system work while the conflict model argues whose view is right.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is to a large extent that Marxism is a useful theory in explaining the causes of crime. This is because it highlights the inequalities in society and how the ruling class owns the means of production. This fails to show reasons why not everyone is facing status frustration and lower income turn to crime.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The sub-area of criminology concerned with the role social forces play in shaping criminal law and the role criminal law plays in…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Crime Essay

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Statutory and judicial guidelines inform the exercise of judicable discretion in the area of sentencing. These guidelines aim to provide greater uniformity in sentencing matters and enhance the integrity of the process. Judicial guidelines are judgements from superior courts that aim to structure discretion, this is shown in the case R v Jurisic (1998), this case was used by the Criminal Court of Appeals to set guidelines that any non-custodial sentence for culpable driving should be exceptional. Judges are bound to any relevant legislation which impacts upon the sentencing process such as: The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) this prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) this prescribes general guidelines in relation to sentencing. For example it identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left to the exercise of judicial discretion as to how much weight should be given to such circumstances. Mandatory sentencing takes away the exercise of judicial discretion. The court has no choice but to impose the legislated sentence. Amendments to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), have prescribed minimum non-parole periods for specific offences, such as ten years for aggravated sexual assault. The provision of statutory and judicial guidelines means that limits are placed on a judge’s discretion when sentencing, and this ensures sentencing consistency. However, some people feel that judges still have too much discretion when sentencing, and that some sentences are too lenient. Link…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different perspectives and schools of thought when it comes to the study of crime. One such theoretical perspective is known as classical criminology, which can be traced back to the early 18th Century. Ideas of the Enlightenment which took place around this time, contributed to foundation philosophies of classicism (Carrabine et al., 2014). The notions of reason and science were beginning to take hold across areas such as political and social spheres of society, so unsurprisingly influenced the way people thought about crime (Bradley & Walters, 2005). Classicism reflected the fundamental aspects of the Enlightenment (science, reason, practicality) in the way it approached dealing with the problem of crime (Taylor, Walton, & Young, 2013). The methods of dealing with crime before the introduction of classical thought were harsh and unjust (Bradley & Walters, 2005).…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Describe, using evidence, any two influences that explain why a person turns to crime. (10)…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war on drugs started with the need to stop the movement of drugs into the United States. President Nixon was the first president to understand the severity of the impact drugs had on society. He proclaimed the need to interfere on the number of drugs coming into the United States. With his necessity to intervene he supported the creation of the Drug Enforcement Agency in 1973. With this agency, the war against the drug trade was initiated. His efforts were reinforced by President Reagan in the 1980s when he enforced and declared the war on drugs. President Reagan influence, resulted in more individuals incarcerated for drug offenses. This began to take an effect on correctional institutions because they began to experience an increase in…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does America have a crime problem, or a mental health problem? Or, do we have a mental health problem that is contributing to our growing crime problem and incarceration rates? Numbers indicate that America's growing crime and incarceration rates are greatly contributed to by untreated mental health issues. While having a mental illness does not automatically negate ones responsibility for having committed a crime, it is something that needs addressed during and after incarceration. Anyone who has dealt with a friend or family member who has a mental illness knows the general public is not well equipped to deal with these issues. So it is easy to understand how staff at the nations various correctional facilities would not be much better at…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race And Crime Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As I wrap up my blog we have seen that crime is not race specific. All races commit crime, furthermore all races participate in gang activity, it is just not reserved for Black and Latinos. All of the examples used in the previous blogs are not exclusive to certain races. What makes the difference is how society views who is a criminal and who commits crimes. Added to this, is the disproportion of how crime is handled. With the exception of heinous and violent crimes, many people who commit crimes will most likely get away with it. How the criminal justice system handles cases can affect who goes to prison and who doesn’t. Furthermore criminals that are more culpable may get away with lighter sentences, than those that are only accessories to the crime, simply because of their race, or because they can afford better attorneys.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminological theories and philosophy of criminology are virtual in the study of the relationship between crime and public transit. Variety in the criminological theories and concepts can be employed to analyze this relationship: routine activity theory, crime pattern theory, and rational choice theory always serve as bedrock in the researches related to environmental criminology, and besides these, journey to crime, iron law of troublesome places, geographic profiling, crime attractor and crime generator are also often used in these studies.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most predominant areas of study in sociology is in the explanation of crime and deviance in society. Criminal acts are those which violate established formal laws, whereas deviance refers to the breaking of social norms. Crime and deviance are a social construct as they are decided by the people in a society and can vary greatly depending on the society in question, as well as the time period being studied.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays