Preview

Social Constructionism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Constructionism
This essay will discuss
This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.
According to Surrette (2007) Social constructionism simply put, views knowledge as something that is socially created by people, it takes the shared meanings that people hold in common such as ideas and interpretations of reality, agreeing to view it in a certain way.Social knowledge can change as perceptions and perspectives change, with social knowledge being gained from 4 main sources (Personal experiences, (Significant others, other social groups and the media - symbolic)).
Social constructionist theory recognises 3 kinds of reality; Experienced reality, symbolic reality and socially constructed reality. Experienced reality is knowledge gained through an individual’s direct experience of the world, this form of reality has a powerful influence on the individual but is limited in scope. The second is symbolic reality where the three sources share their knowledge symbolically where events you did not witness but believe occurred, all the information from the world you believe to be true but did not collect yourself. Consequently, the socially constructed reality Is a mixture of personal and symbolic knowledge and experience which forms our own individual ‘world’.
Surrette 2007 breaks down the media’s role in the process of social construction into 4 categories, the first category describes how crimes occur in the physical world and are recognised by organisations and individuals. Surrette notes that the first stage usually dictates the boundaries and conditions which the other stages must work within.
The second stage offers how competing constructions show

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    construct. When an individual is subjected to socialization, they are introduced to the common values, beliefs and cultural norms that are established in society. Despite the ongoing and…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike the idea of the essentialist perspective of believing in the innate essence of everything visible and tangible, the constructionalist perspective adopts the idea regarding the origin of reality as being shaped by society including time. Commonly, the concept of time is hardly discussed, much less thought of as something more than always present or as a way of organization. Yet time had to undergo a beginning and a process to reach its current state. The idea of time highlights the progression needed in order to become a reality. It was not something that simply was nor originated naturally. Time is ingrained into the mind of societies after a progression of social construction. Slowly, but steadily, the concept of time came to be what…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social constructionism accepts that there is an objective reality. It is concerned with how knowledge is constructed and understood. It has therefore an epistemological not an ontological perspective. Criticisms and misunderstanding arise when this central fact is misinterpreted. This is most evident in debates and criticisms surrounding realism and relativism. The words of Kirk and Miller (1986) are relevant when they suggest that the search for a final, absolute truth be left to philosophers and theologians. Social constructionism places great emphasis on everyday interactions between people and how they use language to construct their reality. It regards the social practices people engage in as the focus of enquiry. This is very similar…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constructivist perspective upon learning, focuses on how knowledge is actively constructed by the learner. The knowledge the learner constructs, is based on their individual and shared mediated experience. Constructivists argue there is no other reality other than what the student creates. Constructivist learning also inter links with cognitivism, as the constructivist learning can be described as an adaption which can occur via cognitive processes. Experience of the real world is a key concept of this learning perspective.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Deviance in sociological context describes actions or behaviors that violate cultural norms including formally-enacted rules (e.g., crime) as well as informal violations of social norms.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “As we thought Social Construction Theory is worried with the ways we consider and utilize classifications to structure our experience and investigation of the world”…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What caught my attention in the reading and discussion, is the term ‘’ Social Constructionism of realty’’ which is seen as the theory of knowledge in sociology and also communication of theory that looks into the development of a jointly constructed world. Therefore, it also proves that the understanding, importance and concept are developed and not separated within individuals, instead they are coordinated with other human beings as well. In order words, the elements to this theory are as follows; (1) the belief or assumption that every human beings rationalize their experience by creating a model of a social world, including how it functions (2) that language is an important system that enables humans construct reality.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yvonne Jewkes talks about strengths and weaknesses in her book ‘media and crime’ one of the strengths she looks at is ‘The power of the media in defining what counts as normal and deviant behaviour, and the effects of such media labelling on particular social groups.’ (Jewkes, 2011, p.1) This…

    • 1224 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Thomas Theorem, people’s behaviors can be determined by their subjective construction of reality rather than by objective reality. In The Social Construction of Reality book, Berger and Luckmann also argued that society is created by humans and human interaction. Reality is not absolute and what we understand to be “real” is actually a social constructed idea. It means that reality is based on social agreement and we construct our own society and accept it as it is because others have created it before us (OpenStax College, 2015, p.91). That our perception of reality is basically shaped by our social and physical…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. Compare the absolutist, relativist, and social power perspectives. Which perspective do you believe would best describe your approach to deviance? Why would you choose this approach? Which of these approaches exhibits the most respect for deviant’s choice of behavior? The absolutist perspective, dominated by religious settings, hold that deviance is universal and what is wrong in one place, is wrong everywhere. This tactic to describing deviance rests on the supposition that all human behavior can be considered either innately good or innately bad. Deviant acts come to define the individual’s character and can often be based on stereotypes i.e., all parents who spank are abusing their children or all Muslims are terrorists. The absolutist perspective assumes an extensive unanimity over definitions of deviance, universal norms, and taboos. Durkheim said that social laws replicate unbiased facts integrated into functionalist notions of deviance. This perspective maintains that deviance is pathological and an objective fact. Deviance is considered unethical and reproachful of social order, requiring unyielding, retributory measures.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The role media is playing in the society and how it is affecting communities and individuals is important to investigate. Crime and criminality have a strong connection between moral panics, as moral panics are dependent on them. Criminals are the main key persons, who try to create moral panics, as it helps them in shifting the focus of the society from them to those who are innocent (Goode & Ben,…

    • 1657 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Discuss some of the inequalities that exist within our criminal justice system. Deviance is defined by breaking social norms, which includes minor offenses, such as not swearing in front of children, and more serious deviance, like murder. Deviance that is perceive as dangerous to social structure is labeled a “crime” and is punished by societies. Each society defines deviance differently based on what their values are.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society crime does more than expose the weakness in social relationships it undermines the social order itself by destroying assumptions on which it is based (Schnalleger, Chapter 1 what is criminal justice, 2011). Society has many different definitions of crime. The text states that crime is conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government or, local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse (Schnalleger, Chapter what is criminal justice, 2011). There are many models of how society determines which act are criminal, but the two most common are consensus…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Harm Definition

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay aims to explore and critically evaluate some of the ways ‘crime’, in both its lawful definition and commonly interpreted definition can be broadened, from context-specific behaviours and explore how social harm may be a useful concept in understanding ‘beyond the border’ of crime (Open University, 2010).…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In concluding it is evident that social construction and the common sense approach differ in their explanations of problems. Common sense requires no evidence and predominately relies on basic knowledge and pre conceived ideas that exist within a society. In contrast social construction uses evidence and research to question these statements and further explores how these problems affect…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays