Preview

Social Contract

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Contract
Short Paper: Living Ethically through a Social Contract
Olivia Harris
ETHC 445N: Principles of Ethics

Living Ethically through a Social Contract Scenario 1: The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry. In the above scenario, the consequences of the mayor taking bribes or “hush money/gifts” in exchange for approving contracts with these organizations are great. The mayor could possibly lose his position as Mayor and/or he could also be faced with potential federal charges for coercion and bribery. In this case, the mayor’s actions are not those of the greater good but of deceit. He is knowingly excepting elaborate gifts from organizations that either have existing contracts with the city or are planning to do business with the city in the future in exchange for city contracts. Who could benefit from this? Well it depends on if these businesses are profitable for the city. If so then the city, the mayor and the contract holders all could potentially benefit from this. However, the flip side is if these contacts bring more crime or bad/unwanted business to the city then no one would benefit from it. In this situation, the consequences are not ethically justifiable for the actions. At no time is it ethical to take a bribe for any reason especially if you are appointed by the people to serve as a representative for the people. Locke believed that everyone has a conscious and that it would guide us to do what is morally right and in this case Locke would be in agreement with me that the mayor did not make ethical decisions by taking bribes from these organizations. Locke would have the Mayor removed from his position. Scenario 2: A college instructor is pursuing her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case study focuses on the bribery scandal surrounding the city selection process for the 2002 Olympics held in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. The student is ask to discuss the merits of the case based on three parameters, ethical behavior, the impact of culture, and the bid process from a broad based business point of view. They are also ask to speculate as to their actions if they were particular individuals associated with the chain of events.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis of Gotta Love

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The ethics triangle is a model to follow to help militate against unethical decision-making. If Mayor Burns used this model it might have helped him make better decisions. When there is no moral discernment of what is right or wrong, a public official or administrator needs to analyze the situation carefully. However, in the following case study this does not appear to be something Mayor Burns practiced. For the purposes of this paper the case study “Gotta Love Those Bread & Butter Unions” will be analyzed. The source for all subsequent quotes is from this case study.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contracts Ii

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Millie contracted to sell Frank 10,000 bushels of corn to be grown on Millie’s farm. Due to a drought during the growing season, Millie’s yield was much less than anticipated, and she could deliver only 250 bushels to Frank. Frank accepted the lesser amount but sued Millie for breach of contract. Can Millie defend successfully on the basis of outcome impossibility of performance? Explain. Discuss the elements of impossibility of performance and the three situations where this defense can be used.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anywhere from 25% to 66% of households in the U.S. today belong to the middle class, but what exactly determines if a worker or family is considered middle class? How was the middle class created, and which events have had an effect on the middle class over the decades? This paper aims to answer those questions, as well as taking a look at the impact of specific collective bargaining gains and attacks on public sector bargaining.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no doubt; the mayor is an unethical person. It’s not a bad thing to exchange gifts unless there is some unethical string attach to it and as the scenario clearly mentioned that the mayor received those gifts to provide certain unethical favors back to the gift senders. A person may have a counter argument that those contractors were not doing something illegal but rather providing services to the city and creating more jobs. It is may be true that those contractors will contribute to city development but it eliminates the process of merit. What if there are better people with great ideas for city development, would they get chance to contribute to city’s development, the answer is no thus the city’s future growth and construction will be limited to certain hands. Therefore for mayor to accept gifts is completely unethical and it reduces or completely eliminates the chances for well skilled contractor to get merit based contracts.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan, considering stakeholder needs.…

    • 401 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Week3

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Mayor’s decision to accept these gifts was ethical because anyone who is receiving gifts would automatically accept and wouldn’t even think twice about accepting them. But I believe it is wrong for the Mayor to accept gifts from organizations that have not business with them because it might cause controversial between them if they don’t pursue on working with them. The actions represented a greater good because the Mayor accepted their gifts out of courtesy to build relationships with the organizations. The Mayor would benefit from the good because he is also receiving gifts for himself. The consequences did not ethically justify his decision of accepting the gifts. I believe Locke would have addressed the problem the same way the Mayor and accepting the gifts out of respect and appreciation.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contract Law

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Australia’s legal system is based on the English legal system.” To what extent is this statement correct? Discuss.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our Fuzzy Social Contract

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A social contract is an agreement between citizens and their ruler. It defines the rights and duties of both the ruler and their citizens. Social contract theory is a notion that denotes an implicit agreement within a state regarding the rights and responsibilities of the state and its citizens. All members within a society are assumed to agree to the terms of the social contract by their choice to stay within the society without violating the contract. A violation would mean an attempt to return to the state of nature. Of many social contract theorists, the United States closely follows John Locke, which affects the United States citizens. The U.S. Constitution is a social contract and the founders used John Locke's social contract theory to base their Constitution on. Most people support the U.S. Constitution and social contract theorist, John Locke; they feel there are positive effects of borrowing John Locke's ideas in the U.S. Constitution. Robert Alexander discusses the negative effects of the U.S. Constitution on the United States citizens. Robert Alexander's article " fuzzy social contract," is featured in Bart Kosko's book Fuzzy Thinking. By following Locke's theories and ideas, there has been an overall negative effect on the United States citizens.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mills's Social Contract

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mills believes the social contracts goes beyond a “blindness” society. He criticizes Rawl’s concept of a social contract, as he believes race is an important part of how the members of such contract is established. Mills believes our society only sees white male individuals as “full human beings” and anything other than that are “less” humans and therefore nor worthy of the benefits of the social contract. He believes we are sold in the idea our founding fathers established on the constitution, where “every man is treated equal.” However, non-white people, along with women are treated less than their counterpart white male and does not enjoy the benefits of equal treatment. While we think race is something fairly new, and people have beginning…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Social Contract Theory

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Todays media and entertainment have recently been flooded with movies and TV shows based on a post apocalyptic world where the world has fallen into disarray and it has become every man for themselves. While there have been many terrible crimes against humanity our world hasn’t submitted to dissolution and in large part we have remained united. The reason the world hasn’t fallen back into such a primitive state is because of the social contract theory; the social contract theory is a theory about creating rules for humanity. Due to the social contract theory people had to change the way they thought and made decisions and these personal decisions eventually had a ripple effect on the larger community. Unlike theories in physical science, social…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Contracts

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contracts are a written promise to do something, or not to do something. The purpose of the contract is to ensure that both parties will perform the duties that they have promised to do, or to prevent something that was promised to prevent. Contracts are here to ensure that people follow through with their word when they promise to do something. With a contract, you can make a promise a legal obligation.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ursury Laws

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shafer-Landau, R. (2012). The fundamentals of ethics. (2nd ed., p. G-6). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Expansive Social Contract

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ‘So, I ask you, which of these systems epitomize life’s natural order? Which of these systems will produce individuals who possess the skills and habits of mind necessary to confront the realities of this nasty, short, and brutish life? Will the greatness of this nation be maintained by individuals who believe that life owes them a living, or by those who believe that anything they are due will be reaped by talent, ability, and, at times, ruthless cunning?’…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contract Law

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not, were they were obliged to re-tender the contract for failure to inform Smart as such and equally liable for break of contract. Mr. Justice Kelly ruled against Smart Telecom, upholding the judgment made in The Harvela Case (1986) – one with very similar facts. Both Kelly J. and Lord Templeman shared the view that where there is an expressed contractual promise to accept the highest bid – that excludes referential bidding. And that RTE had no obligation to reiterate terms of contract to Smart - as there were no alterations to those existing terms. I expressly agree with these judgments.…

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays