Preview

Social Darwinism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Darwinism
Social Darwinism is the theory developed in England and the United States that includes the ideas of Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest. It generally states that the strong will survive, gain power, be wealthy and prosper in society while the weak will die off, lose power, be poor and not prosper in society. The stronger you are the generally better your life will be in society. It is not something that you choose, but something that fate has chosen for you. You can be the hardest working person in the world and only achieve half of what someone else has, when it was just handed directly to them. That is how the world works, it is not a pretty place where everyone is happy and taken care of. The world is a battleground where you have to fight for what you want and what you want to achieve. The idea of everything being "fair" in society is a long lost dream. There is no way around it, people will be starving on the streets of Detroit while a movie producer in Los Angeles eats a three course meal and throws half of it in the garbage. There are a couple different views on Social Darwinism and in the paragraphs that follow I will try to help you understand them and then give you my own personal opinion on this idea that has so many people thinking deeply today. One of the obvious views is pro-Social Darwinism. These are the people who do fully believe in this idea and think it should be spread everywhere. Most of these people who believe that are not necessarily at the bottom of the food chain. Why would someone want to be put in a lower category and written off as weak and not given an opportunity to survive? The main supporters of this group would be the stronger, wealthier and more accomplished people in the world. It just wouldn't make sense for a bottom feeder to feel this way about Social Darwinism. One of the main arguments that this group gives is that they made their way to the top and even thought they were helped by "fate" or "luck" it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    apush studyguide

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Social Darwinism-philosophy that used Darwin’s survival of the fittest to justify war and conquering of stronger nations against weaker nations…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the last third of the nineteenth century, steel became a more widely used material after…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Social Darwinism- The application of Darwin’s concept of “the survival of the fittest” to explain evolution in nature to human social relationships.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    H.G. Wells wrote directly of Darwinism in the book The Time Traveler. A great exploration of separation of social classes and the prime example of " the strongest will prosper." The Time Traveler has realized that social standings in the future, 802,701, is different from the past in only of an intellectual standing. " So in the end, you would have above ground the Havers;pursuing health, comfort and beauty, and below ground the Have nots; the workers, getting continually adapted to their labor." ( Line 1) The Time Traveler realizes this because of his own social standing in his society. The Time Traveler does not cringe about his observation, but accepts these finding with a subtle acknowledgement. "In the end, if the balance was held permanent,…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall Sahlins wrote this short book in 1976 in response to E O Wilson's 'Sociobiology'. Sahlins gives a brief critique of what he called 'vulgar sociobiology' which is a critique of simplistic notions of genes and evolutionary biology. The majority of the book is a critique of what he called 'scientific sociobiology' and which he basically reduced to 'kin selection' and what he sees as its failings. He says human kinship is culturally created and about shared interests, and is not literal blood dependent. Sahlins believes that human groups make up some close blood kin, but also people who are non-relatives while there are normally people of closer blood kin than these in others groups. This is also the case for all other social mammals. The origins of this goes back before humans to the first social animals, when sexually maturing offspring of one sex or both sexes dispersed to find mates in other groups. Groups do not inbreed. It is this flow of individuals between groups that spreads genes throughout the species - and if this does not happen there is speciation. A group that simply inbred would either degenerate or become a new species. Sahlins does not mention how other social animals also live in 'mixed' groups so it is not clear if he thinks it is a unique feature of humans or not.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agenda

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    • Explain the concept of "Social Darwinism" and how did this affect views on governmental policy.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the world came about by natural selection, then natural selection should continue to rule. If the world is survival of the fittest, one’s whole life should be devoted to building up their own castle, not their neighbor’s. Also to an evolutionist, moral obligations are useless and can be completely ignored, perhaps they don’t even exist. If everything is material, then why would anyone listen to a feeling that tells them to give up their belongings? It does not make any sense to donate to charities. Many Neo-Darwinists also do not believe in right versus wrong. This means that one should keep all of their earnings because it is not any better for them to give them up.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel McTeague written by Frank Norris is considered a parallel to the concept of social darwinism. Social darwinism is “the social concept based on Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection which suggested that human social organization was based on the survival of the fittest and the idea that certain classes and races dominated because they are biologically superior.” The novel Mcteague has numerous characters that parallel the concept of social darwinism. In the novel Mcteague, Norris portrays social darwinism through the characters maria and zerkow by the way they steadily remain in their class respectfully throughout the novel and the characters Mcteague and Trina who attempt to act as though they were in another class and made rapid attempts to move up in the social classes.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. One way evolutionary psychology can answer Dylan’s promiscuity is that it has become a learned behavior that he has never had to correct/change. The study states that he has been promiscuous since high school and he sees no reason to change his ways.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems to me that we are all on the same page when it comes to the idea of pacifism and it’s importance. Even though my theories are based on how organisms fight for survival, seeing present-day problems it’s clear to me that pacifism is the key for solving those issues. One thing I did say in the past seems to have become true though, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world.” (In text citation). This is not Social Darwinism nor was I a supporter of it, where human superiority over others is justified by race or class, but merely natural selection of civilized and barbaric people. This is relevant because…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to Social Darwinism, there are a lot of pros and cons. First, we must understand that this idea was Herbert Spencer, but the person who was most recognized for this concept was, Charles Darwin. When it comes to, “survival of the fittest,” it was mainly talking about, you had to get in where you fit in. A lot of people did not agree with this theory, so this is where the cons comes in. Darwinism can be subjective.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Origin of the Species," Charles Darwin argued that different environments encouraged the reproduction of those species whose varying traits best suited them to survive; their offspring, in turn, would be better adapted for the new environment, as would their offspring, and so on. Social Darwinism, developed by British philosopher Herbert Spencer, frequently misapplied this concept of "natural selection" to justify 19th-century social stratification between the rich and poor. The catch-phrase "survival of the fittest" (actually coined by Spencer, not Darwin; Spencer also popularized the term "evolution") does not mean the surviving members of an environment are the "best," but merely the best fit for their specific environment (for instance, Spencer's pale British skin would not survive long in sun-baked Africa). Therefore, evolution does not lead to the "perfectibility" of any species, as is generally perceived, but to the increasing adaptability and complexity of a species. Social Darwinism ignored this idea and contended that the social environment was much like the cutthroat natural environment, and that those who succeeded were biologically destined to do so and to continue in their march to human perfection. Conversely, those who failed were naturally inferior specimens of…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Call of the Wild

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jack London writing technique influence his readers to consider Social Darwinist has an outlook on life. Merriam Webster's explain Social Darwinist "to study of the human society, specifically a theory I human sociology that individuals or groups achieve advantages over others as the result of genetic or biological superiority. In class my classmates interpret it as "the survival of the fittest." I agree with them, but I feel that you have to learn and gain from…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism

    • 813 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1864, the theory of evolution became very well-known when Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species. Here he explained about his belief in what he called natural selection. Years later, after reading all about natural selection and becoming quite intrigued by it, a man by the name of Herbert Spencer, a polymath philosopher, came up with a synonym phrase for natural selection: “survival of the fittest.” This term, although referring to the capabilities of species to adapt to their environments, soon became a term used to describe real life. This became known as Social Darwinism.…

    • 813 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Darwinism relates that human being respond instinctively to urges and drives in his domain his primary motive been one of survival. His view of the world in a natural sense is that only the fittest will survive.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays