Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Social Darwinism--from Website

Good Essays
1221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Darwinism--from Website
Social Darwinism

Introduction
Social Darwinism is a quasi-philosophical, quasi-religious, quasi-sociological view that came from the mind of Herbert Spencer, an English philosopher in the 19th century. It did not achieve wide acceptance in England or Europe, but flourished in this country, as is true of many ideologies, religions, and philosophies. A good summary of Social Darwinism is by Johnson:

In these years, when Darwin's Origin of Species, popularized by Herbert Spencer as "the survival of the fittest, " and applied to races as well as species in a vulgarized form, Social Darwinism, the coming Christian triumph was presented as an Anglo-Saxon Protestant one.

Social Darwinism is by no means dead, for vestiges of it can be found in the present.
What Is "Darwinism?"

Charles Darwin was an English biologist who, along with a few others, developed a biological concept that has been vulgarized and attacked from the moment his major work, The Origin of Species, was published in 1859. An accurate and brief picture of his contribution to biology is probably his own: Evolution is transmission with adaptation. Darwin saw in his epochal trip aboard the ship The Beagle in the 1830s what many others had seen but did not draw the proper conclusions. In the Galapagos Islands, off South America, Darwin noted that very large tortoises differed slightly from one island to the next. He noted also that finches also differed from one geographical location to the next. Some had shorter beaks, useful for cracking seeds. Some had long, sharp beaks, useful for prying insects out of their hiding places. Some had long tail feathers, others short ones.

Darwin took copious notes, captured insects and animals and selected plants. These he preserved in jars and took them back to England where he thought about the implications of what he had seen. for almost three decades. What occurred to him was a simple notion: animals, plants, insects, fishes, etc., which were obviously related differed slightly and these differences seemed to be tied in with their ability to survive. Differences, which he called "adaptations," were often related to geographical factors. He also saw something similar in fossils: certainly some fish, sea shells, etc., that died and were covered up by sand, gradually turned to stone, and were caught forever in fossil form. There seemed to be an interesting, complex relationship: extinct animals, fish, insects, plants, etc., looked somewhat like contemporary ones but were not in the same phyla. (That is, they were not of the same kind, type or variety.)

What this seemed to mean to Darwin was biological evolution. Organisms better suited to their environment gained some survival advantage and passed their genetically transmitted advantages to their offsprings. Darwin thought that this process was extremely slow and even. In fact, we became aware that it is neither slow nor even: there are examples of a good deal of change in a short period of time; and there are examples of very little change over a long period of time. Nor did Darwin understand the mechanism by which the transmission took place. This was to be figured out by Gregor Mendel, Thomas Hunt Morgan, DeVries and in our own time, Watson and Crick who deduced the spiral shape of the DNA molecule.

Darwin's discoveries struck his native England, as well as Europe, and this country with an enormous impact. They ran into total conflict with the idea of special creation, which one can find in the Book of Genesis, especially Chapter I and II. The emotional impact of Darwin's discoveries have not abated.

The Misapplication of a Biological Theory

But, for our purposes, it is the use to which some people made of biological evolution which concerns us. Some simplified the idea to "survival of the fittest." Others believed that an identical process took place among human beings. They believed that white Protestant Europeans had evolved much further and faster than other "races." And some, especially the followers of Herbert Spencer, took it one step further. Human society is always in a kind of evolutionary process in which the fittest- which happened to be those who can make lots of money--were chosen to dominate. There were armies of unfit, the poor, who simply could not compete. And just as nature weeds out the unfit, an enlightened society ought to weed out its unfit and permit them to die off so as not to weaken the racial stock.

This idea eventually led to a variety of practices and beliefs, e.g., Nordic Racism, used by German anthropologists and later Nazi theoreticians. It also led to eugenics in which, it was believed, the unfit transmit their undesirable characteristics. A breeding program for human beings would see to it that the unfit did not transmit their undesirable characteristics.

Another application of a biological concept to human behavior was the notion that any attempt to provide welfare for the poor was a tragically misguided mistake. Feeding or housing the poor simply permitted them to survive and to transmit their unfitness to their children, who in turn would pass it on to their children. A spurious piece of sociology about two families known as the Jukes and the Kallikaks purported to trace a race of criminals and prostitutes to two persons in the Revolutionary War. This study was used for many years to demonstrate that "inferiority" was inherited.

Many in our culture did not bother to read Spencer, Darwin nor did they realize the oversimplification of eugenics. But that is not the point. The point is that a piece of ideology got into American life and assumed considerable importance. What is also significant is that some, e.g., wealthy industrialists, believed that what they were doing was supported by science. Yes, they said, the caucasian, European-derived male industrialist was at the apex of evolution. And yes, they said, it is undesirable to provide, as public policy, governmental support for any plan that would perpetuate racial weakness.

Other social theories competed with Social Darwinism. By the 1930s, the New Deal created a climate in which the government was responsible for a "net" that would not allow any individual to lapse into abject poverty, homelessness on a wide scale, hunger or destitution. However, in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan was elected on a platform which declared that New Deal policies were responsible for poverty, crime, and all other social problems. Government, Reagan kept on repeating, was not any part of a solution to the problem. Government was the problem. Therefore, a good many policies based upon the "net" concept were weakened or simply eliminated.

As we approach the millennium, it is not accurate to say that 19th century Social Darwinism, "Reaganomics," New Deal philosophy or its manifestation in the economic policies of President Clinton is now dominant. A fair assessment is that all of these ideologies can be found within our society--as public policy and as belief structure. The ability of conflicting, incompatible social philosophies to live side by side, even within the same person, (cite) explains why there is so much unresolved conflict, why it is difficult for a given bit of social policy to achieve permanence. why, as many have pointed out, there is considerable poverty in the wealthiest society in the world.

Back to Introduction to Social Justice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 1 KEY QUESTIONS

    • 2259 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While on the beagle, Darwin discovered this first hand with different species he collected that their were different adaptations of species from different coasts and ecosystems. He also began to believe the earth was…

    • 2259 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Social Darwinism- The application of Darwin’s concept of “the survival of the fittest” to explain evolution in nature to human social relationships.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Darwinism- a 19th-century doctrine that the social order is a product of natural selection of those persons best suited to existing living conditions.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.05 Jack London

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social Darwinism is a theory by Charles Darwin that came from Spencer’s idea of the “Survival of the Fittest.” London interpreted this philosophy by writing about superiority of white men in his novels.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 14 Section 3

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Social Darwinism- an economic and social philosophy—supposedly based on the biologist Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection—holding that a system of unrestrained competition will ensure the survival of the fittest.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 19th century and early 20th century the Social Gospel and Social Darwinism Movements had similar but opposite beliefs; Social Darwinist believed every man is for himself and that big businesses were good for the economy, however followers of The Social Gospel believed in Christianity, favored the poor, and believed that everyone should help one another. Social Darwinism was named after the Naturalist, Charles Darwin, and the belief of evolution in society. One of the founders of Social Darwinism is the philosopher Herbert Spencer, who influenced many Social Darwinist leaders, such as William Graham Sumner; Spencer often used the phrase “Survival of the fittest” in his Social Darwinist lectures. Social Darwinists’ believed in…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Darwin started by studying with proclaimed geologists learning how to map lands and animals and develop theories. Darwin’s observations in the lands of wales and throughout various places in South America lead to his theories of coral reefs and formation of volcanic islands securing his position in the scientific community. After securing his position in the scientific community Darwin began to spread his theories of evolution.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darwinism was a concept created by Charles Darwin, who found how plant, animal, and human species developed. This concept then developed another idea, Social Darwinism, “The false application of Darwin’s theory of biological evolution to the political, social, and economic realms, often used to justify the superior dominant countries, groups, or races.” Herbert Spencer, an English professor, thought this idea to be very influential and grew on him. Although Darwin had come up with the theory, Spencer phrased social Darwinism as “survival of the fittest,” where only those who were the strongest and most fit and efficient would survive. Darwin even impacted Marx’s Marxist Theory with his book The Origin of Species. Darwin’s idea of natural selection and survival of the fittest has shown in being one of the most effective strategies of evolution based on previous finding. Individuals all over the world are continuing to positively adapt to their environment and is continuing to influence the…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is Darwinism? According to Scott, Eugenie C. Branch, Glenn (16 January 2009), “the body of theory dealing with evolution, and in particular, with evolution by natural selection.” An English naturalist Charles Darwin (1809-1882), is identified as being the person that developed the theory. Social Darwinism is where we find the emergent of the theory of Natural selection. It is a key process of evolution, the change…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism was the use of Charles Darwin’s scientific theory of evolution and natural selection to a society’s development. The theory stated that in nature, only those who were the fittest survived. This explanation was adopted by many American businessmen who believed the theory to be scientific proof of their power. There were two men who stood out from the group of businessmen; Herbert Spencer and William Graham. Both of these men were extremely influential.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Progressive Era, reform Darwinism directly challenged the previous theory of social Darwinism and the inevitability of natural selection; progressives instead ushered in a period of efficiency and rationale. One method used to achieve this efficiency…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism is the theory that only those who are relatively strong can survive and achieve wealth and the weak will remain poor. It credited the gap in fortune between the rich and the poor to the fitness and strength of the wealthy. One of social Darwinism’s principal slogans was “survival of the fittest”, which was invented by Hebert Spencer not Charles Darwin. The belief was that society was comparable to the animal kingdom and that individuals who weren’t fit enough to survive in the conditions of the world created the underprivileged population. Those who believed in this theory thought that poverty and other society troubles were the result of bad genetics.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles Darwin in 1859 published On the Origin of Species, he explained his theory of evolution. He presented evidence that would further explained his reasoning. The first Darwin looked at the fossils and looked at the geological layers. Next compared the structural of the human hand, bird wing, and a cat paw and hinted that we come from common ancestors. His finally observation was the dramatic change in domestic plants and animals by selective breeding. Darwin believed that species started to change their structure, psychology, and behavior that would help with…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darwin believed that a natural process of animals and species occurred through evolution, which in turn started a natural selection of people who were more superior to others. Following Charles Darwin’s philosophies, Herbert Spencer’s theories and interest in natural and social sciences led him to believe that the natural process of developing a superior race started through evolution. Herbert Spencer believed that in order for society to become developed, it would require a superior race of human intelligence to do it. His ideals and scientific works showed Americans that free competition was the most beneficial path to economic progress and survival. Through superior economic progress, he made popular the phrase, “survival of the fittest.” Only the superior race will succeed and survive.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Darwin provided a mechanism for the theory of Biological Evolution, which is what separates him from previous researchers. Before Darwin’s theory of biological evolution by natural selection, the ancient Greeks were the first to attempt to understand our place in the natural world. Following the Greeks, was Aristotle, he believed that each living form had attributes that could not be altered, therefore, fitting in an ordered rank ladder, and that human beings were at the top of the ladder. Before the 19th century most naturalist believed that there was a single creation event—influenced by the church’s beliefs (Stanford 17). Even then, naturalists continued to develop classifications for animals and plants. John Ray was the first to…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays