´
Ana Marıa Peredo a,*, Murdith McLean b,1 a Faculty of Business, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Drive,
Victoria, BC, Canada V8P 5C2 b Centre for Studies in Religion and Society, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Drive,
Victoria, BC, Canada V8P 5C2
Abstract
This paper undertakes an analytical, critical and synthetic examination of ‘‘social entrepreneurship’’ in its common use, considering both the ‘‘social’’ and the ‘‘entrepreneurship’’ elements in the concept. On both points, there is a range of use with significant differences marked by such things as the prominence of social goals and what are thought of as the salient features of entrepreneurship. The paper concludes with the proposal of a suitably flexible explication of the concept: social entrepreneurship is exercised where some person or persons (1) aim either exclusively or in some prominent way to create social value of some kind, and pursue that goal through some combination of (2) recognizing and exploiting opportunities to create this value, (3) employing innovation, (4) tolerating risk and (5) declining to accept limitations in available resources.
# 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The concept of social entrepreneurship has become well established in business. Popular as well as scholarly books and articles are written about the characteristics of organizations thought to engage in social entrepreneurship. It holds a place in the curriculum of leading business schools, and it is the subject of numerous professional and academic meetings. There are associations devoted to studying and implementing social entrepreneurship, and there are numerous web sites on which one may become acquainted with the concept and receive information and/or advice on putting into it practice. There are even special editions of
References: Anderson, B. B., & Dees, J. G. (2002). Developing viable earned income strategies Barber, K. (Ed.). (1998). The Canadian Oxford dictionary. Toronto, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Ben & Jerry’s Homemade Holdings Inc. (2005). Ben and Jerry’s. Boschee, J. (1995). Social entrepreneurship. Across the Board, 32(3): 20–23. Cone, C. L., Feldman, M. A., & DaSilva, A. T. (2003a, July 14). Align your brand with a social cause Cone, C. L., Feldman, M. A., & DaSilva, A. T. (2003b). Causes and effects Davis, T. (1997). The NGO business hybrid: Is the private sector the answer? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of ‘‘social entrepreneurship’’. Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (Eds.). (2002). Strategic tools for social entrepreneurs: Enhancing the performance of your Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Fowler, A. (2000). NGDOs as a moment in history: Beyond aid to social entrepreneurship or civic innovation? Third World Quarterly, 21(4): 637–654. Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question. Grameen Communications. (2004). Grameen: Banking for the poor. Retrieved 19 January, 2004, from http://www.grameen-info.org/. Hibbert, S. A., Hogg, G., & Quinn, T. (2002). Consumer response to social entrepreneurship: The case of the big issue in Scotland. Johnson, S. (2000). Literature review on social entrepreneurship. Leadbetter, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos. Mintzberg, H. (1991). The effective organisation: Forces and forms. Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1): 76–89. Peredo, A. M. (2003). Emerging strategies against poverty: The road less traveled Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): in press. Peterson, R. (1988). Understanding and encouraging entrepreneurship enternationally Pomerantz, M. (2003). The business of social entrepreneurship in a ‘‘down economy’’ Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Review Panel on the Law of Negligence. (2002). Review of the Law of Negligence report Salmon, M. H. (1995). Introduction to logic and critical thinking. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Singh, R. P. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation Stephens, A. (2003). Ice cream with a mission. New Statesman, 132: 17–18. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, C. J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Summer Issue): 17–28. Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M. J., & Grousbeck, H. I. (1989). New business ventures and the entrepreneur Stewart, A. (1989). Team entrepreneurship. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; Students for Informed Career Decisions. (2000). Ben and Jerry’s. Retrieved 3 February, 2004, from http://www.stanford.edu/group/ SICD/BenJerry/benjerry.html. Tan, W.-L., Williams, J., & Tan, T.-M. (2003). What is the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’? In Proceedings of the 48th World Taylor, N., Hobbs, R., Nilsson, F., et al. (2000). The rise of the term social entrepreneurship in print publications The Big Issue Foundation. (2004). About us. Retrieved 19 January 2004 from http://www.bigissue.com/selling.html. The Northland Institute. (2001). What is ‘‘social enterprise’’. The Schwab Foundation. (2002). Outstanding social entrepreneurs 2002 The Social Enterprise Program News. (2003). Mission branding: Hirshberg on using business to change the world Thompson, J. L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective