Social Facilitation of Complex Tasks: A Comparison of Zajonc's Drive Theory and Cottrell's Evaluation-Apprehension Theory
Running head: SOCIAL FACILTATION OF COMPLEX TASKS
Social Facilitation of Complex Tasks: A Comparison of Zajonc 's Drive Theory and Cottrell 's Evaluation-Apprehension Theory
Abstract
Zajonc (1965) describes Drive Theory as the increase in levels of arousal in the presence of others which enhances the frequency of dominant behaviours. The aim of this experiment was to challenge Zajonc 's theory. This study encompassed ten University students and ten teachers and examined the effect of an Attentive Audience condition compared to Mere Presence condition on the performance of a complex word task. No significant difference was found between both conditions in the mean number of words obtained. This study supports Zajonc 's (1965) Drive Theory as the most reliable indicator in determining individual 's behaviour in the presence of others.
A major area of social psychology is the study of an individual 's behaviour in the presence of others. This is defined as Allport 's Theory of Social Facilitation (Vaughan, 2002). The effect of others on an individual 's behaviour is addressed by the opposing theories of Zajonc 's (1965) Drive Theory that defines Mere Presence and Cottrell 's (1972) Evaluation Apprehension Model that characterizes Attentive Audience.
Allport 's theory was further delineated by the theorist Zajonc in his Drive Theory. Plantania and Morgan (2001, p.190) explain Drive Theory as "the presence of others that produces increments in levels of arousal which in turn enhances the frequency of dominant responses (i.e., responses with the greatest habit strength)." Zajonc places emphasis on an innate stimulation effect in the presence of a non-specific, non-directional other (Markus, 1978). Mere Presence is the presence of a person in the same area as another person performing a task. The Mere Presence individual is either performing the same task but not interacting, or coexists with the other person without interest or interaction (Vaughan, 2002).
A number
Social Facilitation of Complex Tasks: A Comparison of Zajonc 's Drive Theory and Cottrell 's Evaluation-Apprehension Theory
Abstract
Zajonc (1965) describes Drive Theory as the increase in levels of arousal in the presence of others which enhances the frequency of dominant behaviours. The aim of this experiment was to challenge Zajonc 's theory. This study encompassed ten University students and ten teachers and examined the effect of an Attentive Audience condition compared to Mere Presence condition on the performance of a complex word task. No significant difference was found between both conditions in the mean number of words obtained. This study supports Zajonc 's (1965) Drive Theory as the most reliable indicator in determining individual 's behaviour in the presence of others.
A major area of social psychology is the study of an individual 's behaviour in the presence of others. This is defined as Allport 's Theory of Social Facilitation (Vaughan, 2002). The effect of others on an individual 's behaviour is addressed by the opposing theories of Zajonc 's (1965) Drive Theory that defines Mere Presence and Cottrell 's (1972) Evaluation Apprehension Model that characterizes Attentive Audience.
Allport 's theory was further delineated by the theorist Zajonc in his Drive Theory. Plantania and Morgan (2001, p.190) explain Drive Theory as "the presence of others that produces increments in levels of arousal which in turn enhances the frequency of dominant responses (i.e., responses with the greatest habit strength)." Zajonc places emphasis on an innate stimulation effect in the presence of a non-specific, non-directional other (Markus, 1978). Mere Presence is the presence of a person in the same area as another person performing a task. The Mere Presence individual is either performing the same task but not interacting, or coexists with the other person without interest or interaction (Vaughan, 2002).
A number
References: Buckingham, J.T. and Alicke, M. D. (2002). The Influence of Individual Versus Aggregate Social Comparison and the Presence of Others on Self-Evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, (5), 1117-1130. Cottrell, Nickolas B., et al. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (3), 245-250. Geen, R.G., and Gange, J.J. (1977). Drive theory of social facilitation: twelve years of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 1267-1288. Guerin, B. (1983). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A test of three models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 203-214. Guerin, B. (2001). The effects of mere presence on a motor task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126(3), 399-401. Guerin, B., and Innes, J.M. (1982). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A new look at Zajonc 's mere presence hypothesis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1), 7-18. Markus, Hazel. (1978). The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: an unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 (-), 389-397. Plantania, J. and Morgan, G.P. (2001). Social facilitation as a function of the mere presence of others. Journal of Social Psychology, 14(3), 190-197. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-Efficacy Theory: Implications for Social Facilitation and Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 774-786. Schmitt, Bernd H. et, al. (1986). Mere presence and social facilitation: one more time Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22 (-), 242-248. Seidel, S.D.and Stasser, G.L. and Collier 's, S.A. (1998). Action Identification Theory as an Explanation of Social Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, (3), 147-154. Vaughn, G.M., and Hogg, M.A. (2002). Introduction to Social Psychology 3rd Edition. French Forest, NSW: Prentice Hall. Zajonc, Robert B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.