Preview

Social Threat of Juvenile Delinquency

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Threat of Juvenile Delinquency
SOCIAL THREAT OF JUVENILE DELIQUENCY armando c. ceralde april 11, 2012 pangasinan state university

This position paper discusses the increasing number of minor offenders in our society. Juvenile delinquency has been the topic of several discussions and debates among lawmakers and social groups who express their concerns and views citing that it is a serious issue in the society. Historically, the first law that concerns the issue is the P.D. 603 (Child and Youth Welfare Code) signed in December 10, 1974. Under this law, youth offenders were viewed as victims not aggressors. They were oriented to rehabilitation for reformation with the purpose of integrating them into the mainstream society managed by the Juvenile Domestic Relations Court. By virtue of the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 (B.P. 129), the authority over the adjudication of the juvenile (and domestic) cases was then designated to Regional and Municipal Courts which cannot act exclusively on proceedings for youth offenders because functions also as courts of general jurisdiction. This means that rehabilitation for reformation cannot be implemented according to purpose. Children under the age of nine are exempt from criminal responsibility and those between nine and fifteen are liable only if they are able to demonstrate discernment, which is a level of intellectual maturity including the ability to distinguish right from wrong. P.D. 1179 qualifies a youthful offender over nine (9) but not under eighteen years of age at the time of his commission of a crime. Children under the age of nine are exempt from criminal responsibility and those between nine and fifteen are liable only if they are able to demonstrate discernment, which is a level of intellectual maturity including the ability to distinguish right from wrong. P.D. 1179 qualifies a youthful offender over nine (9) but not under eighteen years of age at the time of his commission of a crime. This is followed by R.A. 9344



References: Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (R.A. 9344) Natalie Blanco, Krusada: Juvenile Delinquency, November 32, 2011. Kimberly Jane Tan, GMA News, October 14, 2012 & September 12, 2011 Davinci S. Maru & Rizel S. Adlawan, Sun.Star Cebu, September 17, 2011. Amita O. Legaspi, GMA News, September 13, 2011 Jhunnex Napallacan, Cebu Daily News, August 8, 2007. Statement of the Phillipine Hierarchy on Juvenile Delinquency, Juan C. Sison, 1957 Feast of St. Anne, CBCP News Marianne Murdoch , Juvenile Justice in the Philippines – A Personal Experience UNICEF, Manila

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 1: At what age are individuals truly capable of understanding the seriousness and consequences of their actions? At what age should juveniles be tried as adults?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Juvenile Justice System is part of the criminal law system that focuses on those individuals who are between the ages of 9 and 18. This system was set up for those persons who did criminal acts, but who are not yet considered adults. In most states the age for criminal culpability is 18. While the age of being treated as a juvenile in the court system is up to the age of 18, this can depend on the crime. Juveniles can be transferred to the adult court system if the juvenile court waves or relinquishes its jurisdiction. Juvenile law is mainly governed by state laws…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile justice is the section of law that applies to persons under the age of 18 not capable of receiving sentencing in the adult court system or old enough to be responsible for criminal acts committed in society. In most states the age of criminal culpability is 18 however, the age requirement can be set lower in accordance to certain crimes and statutes set by the state the juvenile lives in. Juvenile law is primarily run by state law and most states enforce a specific juvenile code the system follows. The juvenile justice system primarily focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment for youthful offenders. Society appears to concentrate that children are more capable of change than adult offenders more capable of knowing right from wrong ("Cornell University Law School," n.d.).…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One hundred years ago, the Illinois legislature enacted the Illinois Juvenile Court Act (1899 Ill. Laws 132 et seq.), creating the first separate juvenile court. The policy debates raging around the country in this centennial year(1899), however, make it uncertain whether the traditional juvenile court will prevail. Early in the 19th century, juveniles were tried along with adults in criminal courts. In common law, children under age 7 were conclusively presumed immune from prosecution because they lacked moral responsibility (the infancy defense). Children between ages 7 and 14 were presumed not to be criminally responsible, and prosecutors had to prove that an individual juvenile was culpable. Youth age 14 and older were deemed as responsible for their criminal acts as adults.…

    • 2453 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ten year old boy murders his family. Does he get out when he turns eighteen, because he knows not what he did? Or does he spend the rest of his life in prison? Sometimes teenagers are tried for crimes as adults and face equal penalties that are subject to adults. This is a controversial issue among americans. There are two groups of people. Those who believe that teenagers under the age of eighteen who commit serious crimes should be held responsible as adults for their actions. Courts are said to be too lenient and the young juveniles are evolving into violent youth criminals; And there are those who suggest that teenagers are less likely to understand the consequences of their actions and more likely to become productive citizens if the criminal justice system continues to treat eighteen year olds as juveniles. Juvenile death penalties and life sentences without parole have increased at an estimated rate of three times higher today than fifteen years ago. The youth are still growing to become fully developed, like an adult. There are many cases where tough decisions have to be made and choices must be made by officials. In my opinion all youths at the age of eighteen or younger should be tried as juveniles and all our juvenile courts need to focus more on rehabilitation for the lost of youth to criminal acts. Age should be a factor, not a determinant on how these youths should be tried.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G. A. (2008). Criminal Courts: Structures, Process, and Issues (2nd ed.).…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kentucky, and in many other states as well, after the age of 18 you are considered an adult. This is the level of majority. If someone were to commit a crime at this age or older they would be tried as an adult. Children under the age of 18 cannot be sentenced to death or to life without possibility of parole. This is because children are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well processed decisions. Opinions from one person to the next differ as there are several reasons concerning juveniles how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases (Southerland). The issue may be more of a debate as some people would say that kids do not have enough reasoning and lack common sense. Others, on the other hand, would say that juveniles have plenty of brains and common sense. There are strong reasons as to why juveniles should not be tried as adults and should not be eligible for life without parole.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Infancy is one of the ten general legal defenses used when a child, an individual of seven years of age or younger, is found to be an offender of the law. Our text defines infancy as, “she or he is too young (typically younger than seven years of age) to be able to form the mens rea necessary to commit a criminal act.” (Meyer and Grant 2003) Children who are under the age of seven do not understand the difference from right and wrong, therefore he or she may break the law and may not even be aware of doing so. Those who are eight years of age or older, are expected to understand what right and wrong is, therefore they are then able to be sentenced and punished as an adult if seen fit. Cases of individuals of seventeen or younger are handled on case-by-case basis. Because of the increasing amount of crimes committed involving those under the age of eighteen, laws are constantly being changed to rehabilitate children and teenagers.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is argued that one of the main issues as to why the needs are not being met is because of the tensions in the juvenile justice system itself. Delinquent behavior must be responded to only when competing mandates and priorities. The main focus of the juvenile justice system is rehabilitation for the youth, in performing this it must be taken in account that while holding juveniles for their behavior the community must also be protected.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime - young offenders

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Although it is recognised that young people do commit crimes, they are not often serious crimes. Legal issues faced by young people are often summary crimes such as drug offenses and petty theft, and these are dealt with in the Children’s Court. These types of crimes are considered less serious and often have alternatives to court such as warnings and cautions, especially for first time offenders, which is often the case for young people. Conversely, very serious offences such as homicide and sexual offences are very rarely perpetrated by juveniles. The Young Offenders Act 1997 recognises the potential lack of experience and maturity that young people have in relation to the law.…

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice Act

    • 6506 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Punishment was the central criminal law philosophy in English common law. A conclusive presumption that children under seven could not form criminal intent eliminated the youngest from the criminal justice system. Children between the ages of seven and fourteen were presumed incompetent to form the requisite criminal intent; the prosecutor, however, could rebut that presumption by demonstrating that the child knew the difference between right and wrong. Children over age fourteen were presumed to have the capacity to form criminal intent. There were no special courts for children, and they were treated as adult criminals. Minors were arrested, held in custody, and tried and sentenced by a court that had discretion to order the child imprisoned in the same jail as adult criminals. Although children received the same punishment as adults, they were not provided with many of the due process protections accorded adult criminals. For instance, minors did not have a right to "bail, indictment by grand jury, [and] right to a public trial."…

    • 6506 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The age of the offender will always be looked at upon a court justice system. Well-being of that individual is proven to be over-looked based on the severity of the crime that was committed. As much of a shame as that is, it cannot be helped as that is simply the way of the human heart. This also brings up the inevitable question “what age should an individual stop being considered a juvenile?” Young people who commit…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays