Preview

Socrates Knowledge Vs True Opinion Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Knowledge Vs True Opinion Analysis
Socrates was a Greek philosopher who challenged the thinking of many and taught away the ignorance of others. However, Socrates was too smart for his own good and eventually found himself imprisoned in Athens and on death row due to what he claims were false charges. Prior to his exile, Socrates partook in a particularly interesting situation where he taught an individual, his friend Meno, about the mysteries of life. Together the two talked about many things such as what is virtue, what is just, and how to come to know if something is true. Furthermore, in this conversation Socrates does a very good job in explaining to Meno that knowledge holds more value than true opinion. I agree with and believe that Socrates was correct in his assessment of knowledge vs. true opinion. …show more content…
true opinion, one might say that knowledge is best for some situations and true opinion is best for others. However, Socrates states that knowledge is always better. Imagine that someone told you a car needed an engine to work and then you asked him or her, “why?” But the only response that person was able to give to you was “I don’t know, it just does.” Then someone else told you the same idea of a car requiring an engine except when this person was questioned as to why the engine was required, they responded, “An engine is needed to give the car the rotary force needed to drive the transmission which turns the wheels thus allowing one to drive the car”. This is the difference between a true opinion and knowledge

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start off, Socrates states that one must not care for all opinions; but care for those opinions of a wise man. That is because those opinions of a wise man represent the truth and disobeying them will only bring you harm. And those Rana Hassan 900151184 Philosophical Thinking Dr. Robert McIntyre opinions of a wise man must be those of experts in a certain manner; thus, if an athlete is to be trained he would go to a trainer and listen to his words rather than listen to those whom are not experts.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Socrates did not always think that he was wise, many people labeled him as a teacher. Socrates did not really care for this label. He did not really think that he knew much. Socrates had a friend named Chaerephon who went to the oracle the God of Delphi. Cheaerephon asked the oracle is there any one wiser then Socrates, the oracle answered no (21a). Socrates did not understand this and set out to prove the oracle wrong. While out to prove the oracle wrong Socrates realized he is wise but not because he knew everything, but because he realized he knew nothing and didn’t act as if he did.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After observing the unchangeable nature of Meno, Socrates uses his last attempt to differentiate between true knowledge and right opinion, which can lead to similar action and outcomes. His vital note is that right opinion is easy to lose, but true knowledge can be recollected at any time. A person can listen to another's teaching without pondering and assume that he knows the knowledge behind it, while he only possesses transient right opinion, like Meno's receipt of Gorgias's ideas. However, he will never grasp the real knowledge, which will encompass all specific situations and stay within an industrious, pensive, and open…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Meno, Plato explores the relationship between knowledge and true opinion. For instance, Plato states, “As long as he has the right opinion about that of which the other has knowledge, he will not be a worse guide than the one who knows, as he has a…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates' step in accepting the fact that one is ignorant is very important. It is much like realizing that one has a problem and how that is the first step to correction and improvement. I agree that in many ways today, we are witnessing the same conditions that lead to Socrates' death that existed in Ancient Greece. It is a very interesting comparison and I can see the relations. As for what can be done, I am quite unsure at this time. As Socrates would suggest, I am wise enough to admit of my ignorance on the matter. What was something that you read regarding Socrates that has stood out to you and is perhaps influential? Good job this…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truth and Socrates

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    you able to show that your father was guilty of murder, or that all the…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Republic

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato's Republic, Socrates goes to great lengths to explain and differentiate between the ideas of opinion and knowledge. Throughout society, most common men are lovers of sights and sounds. "Lovers of sights and sounds like beautiful sounds, colors, shapes, and everything fashioned out of them, but their thought is unable to see and embrace the nature of the beautiful itself (Republic 476b)." The few who do recognize the beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Beliefs

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates is a man who deeply believes in his teachings. To search for truth in your beliefs leads to virtuous beliefs. It would not have been virtuous to flee the trial. IF you read his speech you see that he wanted them to learn from this trail. He wanted them to know that these charges were brought by vengeful people and that they were a lie. He believed that the jurors would see the truth in his statement. He did not take money for his time, he did not incite the young men (they did that for themselves). He talks about his wisdom and that the only wisdom he has is knowing he has no wisdom.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His knowledge is always in question, but if learning develops knowledge then technically both are in comparison and shape one another. In The Meno the learning that Socrates faces comes through memory and how the soul rediscovers the truth. This learning that Socrates overcomes can be taught and is put in a specific conclusion with factual evidence. This information in learning is the most confident Socrates gets, therefore this is the next step to discover knowledge. But Socrates does not confirm this or give a solid reason as to why the meaning of knowledge is important.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Glaucon conclude that knowledge and true belief are different powers so their natures cannot be the same (Republic 477c-478a). Knowledge is the most effective power, while true belief is only what enables you to believe. I think the most important part of the Meno in regards to knowledge and true belief is the passage of the Daedalus statue (Meno 98a). With this analogy Socrates is also able to show in book five of the Republic how true belief is worth less than knowledge. By having the statue tied down, it will not go anywhere and you may always rely on it being there for you to admire (i.e. knowledge). By not having the statue tied down, you will not have the security that it will always remain for you to enjoy (i.e. true belief). This shows that possessing knowledge will never leave you, raising its value over true belief.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Daedalus Statues Meno

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page

    At this point of the dialogue, Socrates and Meno have concluded that virtue is at least partly a kind of wisdom. Yet, even though virtue is a kind of wisdom, most virtuous men are not capable of teaching it. Socrates talks about virtuous men whose sons did not turn out as virtuous as their father’s were. Socrates argues, that the fathers taught their sons to the utmost of their abilities (since they were virtuous men), and certainly "would have found the man who could make [their sons] good men." If virtue could be taught at all, it would have been in these cases. Yet this apparently did not happen. Socrates believes that is why Meno and he have failed to find virtue itself in considering such virtuous men. This puzzles Meno, and Socrates explains that, while they had been looking for virtue as a kind of teachable knowledge, virtuous men's good deeds could equally well be the result not of knowledge but of "true opinion." While conversing, Socrates gives the example of a guide on the road to Larissa: whether the guide has knowledge of the way or a true opinion about the way, the result is the same, a successful trip. But if this is the case, Meno asks, "why is knowledge prized far more highly than true opinion, and why are they different?"…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays