Preview

Socrates The Apology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates The Apology
Plato thinking was highly influenced by Socrates as evidenced in his book, “The Apology”. It depicts Socrates as one who was extremely interested in morality, living a good life and mostly caring for the soul. To him, there are no better blessings than those of God. Therefore, he was an ambassador of ethics (Plato & In Richards, 1966). In his writings, Plato brings out the aspect of general knowledge as being what people believe without need for foundational proof. Any act of believing otherwise from the criterion is termed as ignorance and is even punishable in courts of law. A good example used by Plato while writing about Socrates, is that he once found himself in a court of law for believing in other gods and making the youth deviate from …show more content…
The Physiological, Metaphysical and Epistemological
Notably, in distinguishing general knowledge and right opinion, Plato uses the three approaches; psychological otherwise known as the virtue of happiness and ethics, metaphysical based on what is there and finally epistemology which involves logic or perception. Plato brings out Socrates in a dialogue setting where he applies the physiological approach through an inquiry in a court of law. He talks of his belief on a superior god who has called him to serve the city through philosophy. He asks them whether on a balance of probability they would choose to do good over evil. Since he is on trial, putting his defense would normally be expected to accord him a platform to beg for pardon even when what he is accused of is not true. He puts it across that general knowledge dictates he pleads with the jury to show mercy to him as a father with children and responsibilities at home. This is normally what happens during a trial, as people use the good of their family to escape their evils. On the contrary, right opinion was that his values and
…show more content…
In understanding these relations, it was important for me first to understand the contextual meaning of the words. Psychology simply has to do with the mind. What as a human being you know, therefore, end up thinking or acting on it depending on the surrounding or information that is at your exposure. Additionally, I understand psychology to be a branch of science that relates to knowledge of choices, good or bad in equal measure and how we chose to act on it while fully aware that consequences exist.
On the term epistemology, it simply means process involved in understanding or knowing more about knowledge, how it comes to existent in addition to best ways of acquiring knowledge. It therefore involves perception or logic, the language used and beliefs among those who seek to understand knowledge (Plato & Jowett, 1990).
Metaphysical is a branch of philosophy that is mainly concerned with the property of the subject matter. It is used to answer the question of what exist. If something is in existence, there is a force or reason behind it or how human being act. For example good moral are attributed to religion, gods. The three approaches are interdependent as approaches in the branch of philosophy as they seek to give answers to what is knowledge, whether it exists and on how to acquire knowledge and classify it to enable people understand if what they have is the right knowledge or what they claim

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are numerous charges against Socrates in the reading of The Apology. The basic charges against him include impiety, corrupting the youth, and theorizing about unknown topics. He does not believe in the gods that the state does, and therefore seeks for natural explanations to processes that occur in the world around him. He did not recognize the gods and introduced other new divinities. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth. Due to the constant asking of questions and inquiry, it lead him to try to discover new things about life. Since he looked for natural reason, he began to teach others about his understandings. His followers soon began to imitate his methods and expose other people as unwise which was a threat to the order…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. After hearing the oracle, Socrates plans to find a wiser man than himself to…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The claim Meletus made was that Socrates corrupted the young to believe in other spiritual things,…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology is Plato’s accurate depiction of the Socrates’ own defense at the trial provoked by Meletus. However, besides current accusers, Socrates has to speak out to defense against former accusers who have created prejudices of him for long time. Former accusers prosecute Socrates for “studying things in the sky and below the earth” and “[making] the worse into the stronger argument” (Plato 18b-c). Moreover, Meletus, who is one of recent accusers, charges Socrates of “[corrupting] the young and not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in new spiritual things” (Plato 24c). The dialogue between Socrates and the jury as well…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Platonist ethics is all about is the Form of the Good. For him, virtue is knowledge. The soul, being divided in three parts, which are…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates' speech, however, is by no means an "apology" in our modern understanding of the word. The name of the dialogue derives from the Greek "apologia," which translates as a defense, or a speech made in defense. Thus, in The Apology, Socrates attempts to defend himself and his conduct--certainly not to apologize for it.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People are accused all over the world for crimes they are not guilty of. In the text “Platos Apology” Socrates is accused of a crime which is slander. Socrates believes that teaching is not crime and he shouldn't be prosecuted for such an act.Teaching is not a crime. How can he be accused of something that isn't wrong in society?…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Apology

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, I found that it is only named “Apology” but there is nothing about apology there. It is mainly the defense of Socrates for his accusations. He was a very decent intelligent man. Socrates said – “I am not a clever speaker in any way at all-unless, indeed, by a clever speaker they mean someone who speaks the truth.” By this statement he was able to make people think that he is only telling the truth, not making false things with his intelligence. I am amazed by the wisdom of Socrates. He was 70 years old when the prosecution happened. In that age he defended himself well and gave so practical logic in his speech that the accusers were just being dumb.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Apology is an account by Plato of Socrates’ speech given at his trial in 399 BC. Socrates was an Athenian philosopher accused of two crimes: corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. In Socrates’ speech, he explains to a jury of 501 Athenians why he is not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He uses a variety of logical arguments to refute his charges yet in the end he is still found guilty and sentenced to death (Grube 21). Socrates’ use of logos and his absence of the use of pathos makes for an extremely logical speech, however his guilty verdict raises questions about the legal systems and society of Athens at the time, the importance of ethos when defending yourself in the court of law, and even the society of modern day.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world becomes more immersed in advanced technology and more discoveries are made, we assume we know everything. If Socrates were here today he would repeat what he said to Athenians 2,400 years ago, that we know nothing. After Socrates encountered the Oracle of Delphi, which told him he was the wisest man in Athens, he went on a journey to try to disprove the oracle. He did this by asking politicians, poets and craftsmen questions. He knew that he didn’t know everything and along the way, he realized that the public didn’t know more than he did, just that they thought they did. He concluded that he knew nothing and because he acknowledged this, he was the wisest man in Athens. (The Apology of Socrates, 32-35).…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology

    • 4230 Words
    • 17 Pages

    5 under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he…

    • 4230 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apology from Socrates

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Apology From Socrates' The Apology is Socrates' defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates'eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth. Socrates distinguished two groups of accusers: the earlier and the later accusers. The earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court. He is all so accused of being a Sophist: that he is a teacher and takes money for his teaching. He attempts to explain why he has attracted such a reputation. The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. Socrates cannot believe this oracle, so he sets out to disprove it by finding someone who is wiser. He goes to a politician, who is thought wise by him self and others. Socrates does not think this man to be wise and tells him so. As a consequence, t...…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' Apology

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Apology shows the importance of truth and justice throughout the historical development of ancient Greece and of the world in general. The Trojan War plays an important role in Socrates’ apology, showing how our historical development seems predetermined by a higher force or God. Aquilles, similar to Socrates followed the Oracle of Delphi prophecies, which not only determined his fames but his death too. Thus, Plato use of Palamedes in the Apology clarifies, then, Plato’s desire to seek for knowledge and immortality after his death and being closer to others such as Palamedes and Ajax rather that with others who lack knowledge. So Socrates doesn’t’ fear death since is a term unknown to him but rather by sentencing him to death he will win the knowledge of what death is too. Furthermore, Meletus’s contradictory and vengeful plot against Socrates correlates to when Odysseus seek for revenge against Parmedes.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Apologizes

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    An Apology From Socrates' The Apology is Socrates' defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates'eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth. Socrates distinguished two groups of accusers: the earlier and the later accusers. The earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court. He is all so accused of being a Sophist: that he is a teacher and takes money for his teaching. He attempts to explain why he has attracted such a reputation. The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. Socrates cannot believe this oracle, so he sets out to disprove it by finding someone who is wiser. He goes to a politician, who is thought wise by him self and others. Socrates does not think this man to be wise and tells him so. As a consequence, the politician hated Socrates, as did others who heard the questioning. "I am better off, because while he knows nothing but thinks that he knows, I neither know nor think that I know" (Socrates). He questioned politicians, poets, and artisans. He finds that the poets do not write from wisdom, but by genius and inspiration. Meletus charges Socrates with being "a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the State, and has other new divinities of his own." In his examination of Meletus, Socrates makes three main points: 1) Meletus has accused Socrates of being the only corrupter, while everyone else improves the youth. Socrates then uses an analogy: a horse trainer is to horses as an improver is to the youth. The point is that there is only one improver, not many. 2) If Socrates corrupts the youth, either it is intentional or unintentional. No one would corrupt his neighbor intentionally, because he would harm himself in the process. If the corruption was unintentional, then the…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays