The issue that is particularly interesting to me is the “sweetened beverage tax.” This proposal was made to help the children’s health and wellbeing. The proposed course of action and policy agenda Imposes a tax on every distributor for the privilege of distributing in this state bottled sweetened beverages, at a specified rate, and for the privilege of distributing concentrate in the state, either as concentrate or as sweetened beverages derived from that concentrate, at a specified rate of sweetened beverage to be produced from concentrate. Provides exemptions. Requires tax moneys to be deposited in the Children 's Health Promotion Fund for childhood obesity prevention activities and programs. Use of funds includes: improving access to and consumption of healthy, safe, and affordable foods and beverages, encouraging physical activity, regulating weight management intervention activities in the medical setting, improving or building school recreational facilities used for recess and physical education, implementing Safe Routes to Schools programs, improving the quality and nutrition of school breakfasts, lunches, and snacks, and ensuring free, clean drinking water access throughout the school day.…
Alcopop refers to alcoholic beverages that are popular with young people. It is widely taken among underage drinkers. In order to cut potential danger caused by alcopop and to raise revenue, recently Australian government has promoted alcopop tax.…
The NY Soda Ban can be viewed in many different ways with many different understandings. Some people view the Soda Ban as a good thing, while others see it as just another restriction.…
In “Soda’s a Problem but…” Karin Klein distinguishes the government’s issue, “But the mayor’s initiative goes further than something like a soda tax... Bloomberg is playing nanny in the worst sort of way…”(Karin Klein, 289). Simply put, the author explains how the government is overseeing people’s lives and the choices they can make. The government is making decisions by themselves, without the people’s consent! Basically, the limitations on sugary drinks is unacceptable and should be…
In my opinion I think there should be tax for soda, and sweet drinks. First, it states in paragraph three that they are trying to encourage you to exercise more. Secondly, it also stated in paragraph three that they try to reduce suffering and save lives. Lastly, it stated in paragraph two that they try help stop obesity. This is my opinion what's your…
To start off, the text states that soda contains enormous amounts of sugar that can be dangerous. Some people wonder why sugar is so bad and honestly we need sugar in our bodies, but it can rot your teeth and turn your liver into a blob of tissue. Plus, eating excessive amounts can lead to…
In addition, the act would be ineffective because large quantities of soda could still be purchased ("Public Health Concerns: Sugary Drinks). Also, those who do not see eye to eye with the ban, believe that taking away this right may actually backfire by drawing more attention to unhealthy items like large sodas. People are making a mountain out of a molehill; people should be allowed to make their own choices. Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to limit serving sizes of sugary beverages aims to reduce sugar intake and fight against obesity ("The New York Soda Ban."). In addition, research shows that sugary drinks are one of the major causes of obesity and diabetes, and evidence indicates that high consumption of sugary drinks increases the risk for heart disease. Although sugary drinks are not completely healthy, genetics can also contribute to obesity ("The New York Soda Ban."). For example, "Obesity is a serious and complex public health issue facing our nation and the rest of the…
On March 12, 2013, New York government adopted the Sugary Drinks Portion Cap Rule, a limit that prohibited New York regulated restaurants from selling sugary drinks in cups larger than 16 ounces. The intention of this limit is to ameliorate the severe obesity problems of New York city. However, it was not welcomed by neither citizen nor the New York highest court. According to a nationwide poll by Rasmussen Reports, only 19 percent of adults support the soda ban, and the highest court rejected the Sugary Drinks Portion Cap rule in 2014, saying it was “exceeded the scope of its regulatory authority” (Eugene). In my opinion, the soda ban is an effective…
The government regulation of people's dieting is wrong, they are collectivism. This is not right, everyone is not the same. It absurd to make people stop drinking what they want and what they want to eat. They are trying to become a dystopia state, the government is trying to control everything that a person is doing. Is not their chose to tell people to lose weight. I'm guessing they know what they are doing. Banning sodas and putting how many calories the food has is not really going to change their option. The government is making it seem like everyone need to lose weight. Who do they think they are, by telling and banning candy machines and soda from people. Plus, if you break that rule, they will have to pay $200. They are exaggerating with the power they have.…
In the United States, drinking soda is no longer a fad: it is an addiction. Despite the rising medical problems in our country, Americans refuse to reduce their consumption of soda. Whether soda consumers choose to deny links between soda and health risks or ignore them, it is unfortunate that these consumers are oblivious to how serious of a problem drinking soda truly is. Regardless of what companies who produce the drink claim, soda is a dangerous liquid and is harmful to the human body. It is linked to greater weight gain, higher amounts of body fat, and an increased risk of heart disease and Type II diabetes. Health problems in the United States will continue to grow if Americans do not decrease their soda consumption.…
More and more young people are experiencing hypertension and childhood obesity, and because of which are seemingly becoming more prone to various diseases (Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?). Many take a stand on the issue, as New York for example no longer allows the use of trans fats in their restaurants. Still the cost of unhealthy food has remained nearly the same, while the cost of a high yield diet has soared beyond that of the rate of inflation (Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?). The idea has been presented that the government place a tax on unhealthy food, such as America’s favorite – soda pop! Various valid points have been made in relation to how this “sin” tax could help to benefit our financial deficit and better influence the people (A Tax That Invests in Our Health). Others object, saying that the tax is a form of discrimination, separating us about our assumed character and wellbeing (Does This Tax Make Me Look Fat?). Though the answer seems so clear to some at first how to go about imposing such taxes, it is important that the complexity of the situation is recognized to see if the tax would be effective enough to be worthwhile.…
Obesity is a major issue in the United States of America. What defines a person obese is the minimum of thirty percent over their average body weight. It is also the leading causes of poor medical conditions such as, Type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and heart disease. Poor food choices (high in sugar, saturated and trans fats), lack of exercise (sedentary lifestyles), and lack of sleep are several factors that lead to weight gain. There was an article in the New York Post three weeks ago that relates to one of the factors of weight gain. This article was Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s proposal to ban the sale of sugary sodas above sixteen ounces. This proposal would only affect restaurants, theaters, and sports venues. Grocery stores or vending machines will not be affected with the soda ban in any way. Yet, in my opinion, sodas are not the only problem that increases obesity. As an example of a similar proposal, studies have shown that the ban of sodas in schools did not decrease weight gain. Sometimes we have to look deeper into the source of where the problem began such as childhood diets. A solution is to add more healthy nutritional courses available to colleges and universities, since students are introduced into a work related environment, and can manage the skills of time related issues when dieting. In a busy city like New York, this skill can come in handy, and not become vulnerable to the independent high in saturated fat restaurants. Mayor Bloomberg stated, “It is the single biggest step any government has taken to attack obesity.”(Goldenberg). Obviously the school already conducted such a proposal and Bloomberg did not do any research on the issue. In recent articles, the proposal did pass with a eight to zero vote, with one abstention. (Goldenberg). The single abstention did mention, “This is not comprehensive…It is not enough…It’s only one…
Karlee Leach “One 12-ounce soda a day can increase your risk of heart attack by 30%” (Sugary Drinks Can Wreck Your Body! By Evan Cook). Is this really what people want? People dying from heart attacks is a real concern in the U.S., and one way to have a heart attack, is having too much sugar. One cause of consuming a lot of sugar is by drinking it, whether it be Gatorade, Rockstar, or even a vitamin water.…
To begin with, an abundance of soda consumption can cause numerous health problems such as diabetes, weight gain, poor dental hygiene, and even cardiovascular disease. A study done by Yale University has shown that 45 gallons of sugary beverages are consumed per year by Americans. Obesity is a rising health issue among Americans, and soda may be a contribution to this problem. According to Dr. Christopher Ochner, “If everything else in their diet is equal, a person who has a can of Coke a day adds an extra 14.5 pounds per year, just from the calories…
The average American citizen doesn't know of these statistics, which is why we shouldn't be quick to deny the government's restriction of our sugar. Sugar is also said to have long term damages to the liver. Diabetes can be directly linked to the consumption in sugar from HFCS or “High Fructose Corn Syrup” coming from sugary drinks like soda. In and article called the “5 reason HFCS will kill you” the author Dr. Mark Hyman states that “HFCS contrary to what big name companies are telling us, are not a natural sugars. Since HFCS are so cheap and sweet it is the reason that businesses allow their average soda size to go from 8 ounces to 20 ounces.”…