Preview

Something You Wish You Could Change

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Something You Wish You Could Change
English III- 7th
9/21/12
Everyone Deserves to be Punished for their Actions My family recently went through a situation that has really opened my eyes to how unfair our law system is. I never realized the District Attorney had screeners that get to pick and choose what cases will get tried, and if they don’t take the case that person gets off easy. I believe if you break the law you should get tried and get the punishment you deserve, no matter what. The reason I believe everyone deserves to be punished for their action is because my sister recently was a victim of what the cops said was a class three sexual assault. He was eighteen and my sister is only thirteen, and it was non-consensual. The guy has slight mental issues, and even dropped out of school because of them. The cops warned us that this might hurt our chances of getting charges filled on him. I do not agree that a person’s mental status can give them a free pass for breaking the law. Now from the case not being taken my sister feels not only violated by him, but by the law also. She feels like the law doesn’t believe her. He has been caught on exposing himself to others before, and he seems to now be escalating. It seems like it’s going to take him to do way worse before maybe the District Attorney will do something with him. Until this action is ever possibly taken on him, he’s getting to walk free for what he did to my sister; while my sister is left confused, angry, and violated. I don’t see why just because someone might have a little mental problem that they don’t get punished for what they do. Everyone that breaks the law deserves to get punished for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Brock Turner and his execrable decision to rape an unconscious woman outside a fraternity house at Stanford University is most appalling and like any crime committed the consequence should be given in order that, that particular offender might have time to reflect on what they have done. In this particular case Turner has proven that the term rape is deemed so little in the eyes of the law. Instead of receiving a six year sentence he was simply given six months in an institution. Six years or six months no matter the sentence that young lady will be forever be scarred by what he has done to her physically, and emotionally. In her recent statement she said “My independence”, natural joy,gentleness,and steady lifestyle I had…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Naismith does the name mean anything? Well it should, because of Naismith we have the game basketball. Naismith was born in Almont, Ontario, and was educated at McGill University and Presbyterian College in Montreal. Naismith was the physical education teacher at McGill University from 1887 to 1890 and at Springfield College in Springfield, Massachusetts 1890 to 1895 (Bellis). It wasn’t until 1890 that Naismith was given the job to create a new game by Dr. Luther Halsey Gulick, the director of the physical education department (McCuaig).…

    • 694 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, people like Frank shouldn’t be punished the same way as a pedophile and rapist, people like that who do unspeakable things to children and people should be on a registry. The people within a block of a person like that should be aware of the dangers that are around the corner from their home, to be careful with how far they let their children wander. With people like Frank they did not cause any danger to children that parents’ may have to wonder about, they just had consensual sex with their underage girlfriend or boyfriend at the time. Another example Frank was labeled a sex offender and according to Pesta he had to [avoid] restaurants, public swimming pools, football games - any places where there might be kids.” That would be a great punishment if he had harmed children but he hadn’t so why does he have to be punished in a way that we punish pedophiles and…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many defendants who have cases that are correspondingly situated are tried unequally. In my opinion, there are many outside factors that are discussed far too excessively when trying an individual. Unjust resolutions of cases are produced because crime, prior history and race of the defendant are sometimes taken into more consideration rather than the exact context of each specific case being tried. For example, there was a case where four teenage boys committed the same crime but received drastically different punishments. Four boys all around the same age ransacked a home in Tampa Florida. After a few weeks, all boys were arrested. The boys faced the exact same charges: burglary and theft. Two out of the four boys were able to escape from harsh punishment. They were charged as juveniles and put on probation. Out of the four boys, two were Hispanic; the Hispanic boys are serving four-year sentences. All the boys in the cases were minors. This ruling of this case is unjust. This case proves that outside factors that are not involved in a case are playing roles in the sentencing. I believe that sentencing laws need to be more strict in order to maintain…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Answer for the topic: I think that no matter what we do there is always going to be unlawful convictions in this world. Sometimes it tends to affect certain populations more than others.…

    • 3537 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The correctional system has a way of punishing offenders in this country unlike in different countries where you might get a harsher punishment for a crime that might seem more, petty and a lesser punishment for a crime that one would consider more of a harsher crime. In our system however not only are you innocent until proven guilty but you are also allowed to have a trial that can prove otherwise. The system might not always work out how we want it to, or expect it to but it is definitely a fair way of going about it. Offenders in this country get punished on the basis of how horrible the…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broken Windows Theory

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Criminal Justice System is a necessary aspect of American life. America is known for being the land of the free. If you are living in America you have something called “rights”. Rights as a U.S. citizen are based off “The Bill of Rights” in the United States Constitution. The Constitution clearly states the rights that each and every American citizen are entitled to. Most of the population don’t quite understand how many rights they actually do have as an American. With freedom and rights in our citizens’ defense, it’s only natural that more crimes occur and the criminals become incarcerated. But, did you ever think maybe the innocent get put behind bars all because they did not understand their rights? I have the perfect example which forever changed American history and those wrongfully accused; it’s the case of Gideon v. Wainwright.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also setting in jail for months waiting on your trial is a clear violation of due process. To me, going to jail before you have been tried and convicted, innocent or guilty, is absurd. To be put in prison you need to have a trial by jury and to be found guilty without a reasonable…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American judicial system is one of the most fair and unbiased to this day. Innocent until proven guilty is one of our country’s well known statutes. This is because our judicial system is unlike many European countries. Those countries, like Italy or the United Kingdom, presume that the accused are guilty, and give them the task of proving innocence, rather than maintaining innocence. This idea of presumed innocence in America began while the structure of American government was being built. Our founding fathers saw this idea as very important to our legal system, which it is. They wanted to diverge from the tyrannical form of government that was England at the time; our founders did not want any innocent men in prison for something they did not do. However, this…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our legal system grants important rights to all of us. The reason criminal defendants have these protections is because every citizen deserves to be innocent until proven guilty. I believe that basic rights would be protected for individuals facing criminal charges; however, those who violate laws should face proper punishment for their…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law isn't always a fair game. The law is a long process that the government and Supreme Court and president are apart of. They are the ones that decide if the law benefits the majority of people. 9 out of 10 times the law is in the best interest of the people.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is too precious to be thrown away and sometimes people make wrong choices at an early age, but that does not mean that it should affect the rest of their life. Sometimes people make wrong choices at a young age that if an adult were to commit, would affect them to several years in prison or even life. When a youth commits a crime, they are considered juveniles and are dealt with the Juvenile Justice Department. The Juvenile Justice Department decides what kind of punishment the Juvenile gets and in some cases, they are waivered into adult court and punished the same way an adult would be punished. It is right to punish a juvenile with sufficient amount of punishment, but to punish them the same way as an adult is wrong after teaching them…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prosecutors are the people who go against the defense, so they are the ones that put people in jail. The prosecutors are really hard on the people that commit a crime. In the article “How We Misunderstand And Mass Incarceration,” district attorneys have seen their political options expand, and this has encouraged them to remain tough on crime even as crime has fallen”(Gopnik). This illustrates how the system is politically influenced because if the district attorneys did not have a political agenda then they wouldn't be so hard on the punishment. The attorneys just want to make their big break and put people in jail, they do not think about the person they think about their career. This ties back to the Central Park Five case which was a very big case, where the prosecutor put harsh punishments on the five boys who didn't even commit the crime because he wanted to close this big case that would help his career. If prosecutors would just think about the person who committed a crime then there would be a lot of people without long jail. If the prosecutor in the Central Park Five case thought about those boys he would've realized he had the wrong boys. Thus, prosecutors should be so hard on the punishment of a…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    mandatory minimum sentence

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A mandatory minimum sentence occurs when judicial discretions are limited by law (Famm). Those who are convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least the minimum number of years depending on the offense. Amanda Dollak who received her criminal justice degree at CTU, states “Mandatory sentences require every individual to receive the same punishment for similar offenses, regardless of how much a judge may object to the sentence”. These mandatory sentencing laws however vary from state to state, and in other countries. In 1994 California introduced a policy called “3 strikes you’re out”, which meant after a third criminal conviction the arrested person would be sentenced to life in prison (Friedman 109). Soon after California enacted its policy, other states and countries also adopted similar policies. Since then other forms of mandatory sentencing have been established for example, in Britain the mandatory minimum sentence after a third conviction for burglary, is three years in prison (Carrillo). Today there are now mandatory minimum sentences for all types of crimes including possession of a weapon, drugs, and rape.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays