Anderson also shared his views of Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book The Broken Spears. According to Arthur J.O. Anderson even though Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book is mostly of the defeat, the chaos, and grief the Aztecs endured, it is also a story that wanted to remind Spain of their debt they owe to the Aztecs . In my opinion, I also felt that this story was written to make the Spanish aware of their dark history and chaos they brought to ancient Mesoamerica. The book is written in the Aztec perspective and it depicts the Spanish as greedy, careless men who tried to annihilate any trace of Mesoamerican culture and tried to enforce their own way of life. So I do agree with Anderson and feel that the Spanish do owe a huge debt to the natives of Mesoamerican. Anderson also discussed how many natives after the conquest of Mexico were taught by Spanish Francian friars to read and write Spanish and Latin as well as to put their native language into Latin. Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana written in 1528 put native accounts written in Nahuatl with Spanish translation from the Franciscan fathers into one source. The Broken Spears included writings which traced back to the first transliterations such as Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana or The Codex Florentino and many other accounts. Anderson deeply appreciated the energy, artistry and poetry that went in Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book. He felt that Leon-Portilla selected a decent background of the Aztec culture and used effective sources that told the descriptions of the natives very well. He felt that the reader would find Leon-Portilla’s work to be interesting, accurate, and useful to…
With every attack on Yucatán, the severe clash between the Spaniards and Mayans are indicative of the difference in cultures. Jessica Flere: "......." quote this portion that is…
What is a Banned book? Is a question you may ask? A banned book is a book deemed unfit for a particular audience. Maya Angelou has written so many banned books she is the most banned author in the United States. “I Know Why The Caged Bird Sing” is one of her many books, that is banned. “I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings” is banned for many reasons, I’ll let you decide if you think it should.…
Montezuma, who was the ruler of the Aztecs, had a funny feeling about them. Not too long after they arrived, the Aztecs realized that the Spanish could be killed just like their other enemies, so they went to war. They caught some of the Spanish, killed some of them, even ate some. The Spanish won out because of their preparation, and because they brought so many diseases with them, it killed some of the Aztecs as well. The Spanish came to the Aztecs land, and the Aztecs thought that this was the 'God' that they had been waiting for. They treated the Spanish with riches and lavish food, as they would a God. They only treated them to the finest of treasures because they were sure this was what they were looking for. The Spanish reported that they 'were sickened by the people's shocking routines', which was mentioning toward the sacrifice they saw. Then, when the Spanish tried to take advantage of what the Aztecs had given them, they realized they weren’t the Gods they thought they were looking for. So they cut them off. Conversely, the Spaniards had the horses, firearms, and they had most of the people of the Aztec society on their side. With that being said, the Spaniards didn’t like how the Aztec land was being run. With these people and the Spanish's knowledge expansions, they overthrew the Aztec Empire. After the Aztecs were conquered by the Spaniards, they were turned into…
Although Las Casas’s book was short, it was an incredibly painful read that became tiresome. His style of writing was repetitive and dull. The whole book could literally be summed up in one sentence, “The Spanish were cruel bastards that went to the New World demanding gold then killed, enslaved, and exploited the Indians because they thought them inferior.”…
A. This document describes how although all narratives about the people and cultures begin with the arrival of Europeans too much credit is being given to their “discoveries” because before the Europeans the Native Americans (Aztecs) were doing the things the Europeans claimed to be doing first. The Aztecs came up with a way of living and a way of doing things before the Europeans did. Before the Europeans arrival the Aztecs had already created a powerful Empire.…
In this chapter I found a lot of it to be very interesting. The Aztecs have always grabbed my attention in the history of knowing who they were and reasons behind their human sacrifices and social classes. What fascinated me about the cosmic mission theory, also known as the human sacrifice, was how these once humans thought that killing another human would benefit them in a spiritual way. This theory was basically feed humans to the sun to maintain its heat, light and life. The sun, according to the Aztecs, was the life in the heavens and when it went “dim,” and grew dreary, the hearts from humans was the only life that would brighten the sun and energize it with life. It was on a daily routine…
One difference between the Aztec and Spanish was that the Aztec sacrificed people to nourish their gods.…
Their religious views of warfare inhibited their actions in certain ways. Preoccupations with human sacrifice caused them to seek captives rather than corpses. Also their liturgical traditions, which insisted that operations be prefaced by elaborate ceremonies only served to alert the Spaniards of attack. The Aztecs were perhaps weakened psychologically through their traditions, such as their fear of cavalry and gunfire.…
1. Three arguments’ that Juan Gines de Sepulveda used to justify enslaving the Native Americans were for gold, ore deposits, and for God’s sake and man’s faith in him. 2. Three arguments that Bartolome de las Casas gave in attacking Spanish clonial policies in the New World were the Indians eating human flesh, worshiping false gods, and also, he believed that the Indians were cowardly and timid. 3. For comparisons that Sepulveda used, in lines 1-7, to express the inferiority of the Indians was their prudence, skill virtues, and humanity were inferior to the Spanish as children to adults, or even apes to men. Comparisons he used to dismiss the significance of the Indians “Ingenuity for various works of artisanship” were the animals, birds, and spiders that could make things humans could not replicate. In either situation, there was no appropriateness. 4. Las Casas may have weekened his case by requiring that the Spanish must restore what had been taken unjustly from the Indians because the Spanish ultimately modernized them and if they were given back what had been taken, they would again become ‘retro’. If the Indians had been given back their bow and arrows, then they would have no use for them because they have guns. 5. The bias that Las Casas expressed in the last paragraph in his book was that Muslims are savages.…
“The Birds and the Bees”, If you haven’t given “The talk” you’ve probably received it. I remember my mom bought me The Birds and the Bees book from a yard sale and I was mortified that I was supposed to be reading it. Naturally, I pretended to read the book for a week and then tried to hide it away in my attic. At age 11, I wasn’t exactly and expert at hiding things so it was just thrown onto an open shelf in my attic. Little did I except my 8 year old sister to be going into the attic for any reason; getting up there requires being able to reach the pull hook on the ceiling then climbing up the 45 degree angled ladder. I heard a screech from the attic, I ran up and to find my sister sitting there with a horrified look on her face as if she just witnessed a murder. I have a look of shock on my face while I’m bombarded with questions, “What the heck is this? Why do we have this book? Why is this so graphic? I think I might have gone blind! What is this?”. She never let’s me forget about how much I traumatized her. Talking to kids about the taboo topics of sex, racism, and…
The history of slavery between the Spanish and the Aztec was well known. Each nation thought of the enslavement differently. The Aztec society was focused on producing good citizens who would contribute to the community. Each citizen had to live by the written laws that have been made by the Aztecs. In Tenochtitlan you could become a slave if you violate the law. Unlike slaves in Europe, the Aztec’s perspective of being a slave was not shameful, but simply viewed as bad luck. Despite their position in the society, the Aztecs established laws to protect the rights of the slaves, because of imperative work that they had performed. Slaves had the right to keep their property and even their own slaves. Nobles could be executed for beating a slave to death. The Aztec philosophy of slavery consisted of improving your mindset and developing your freedom which meant that slavery was not considered permanent. An Aztec slave could buy back their liberty by showing that they have been abused, run to the emperor’s palace, have children which were born free or get married to their commander in the higher level. After the discovery of the New World, Christian colonists decided to use slaves for labor and improvement of Spain. During their exploration, the Spanish converted many Indigenous people to Christianity and abolished their culture. A big population of the Indigenous people were used as slaves. More than 90 million of the Indigenous people died from diseases and the harsh work brought by the Spanish. To increase their income, Christian Spain also traded slaves with other nations. Zero respect was given from the Spanish to their slaves who could not earn back their freedom and faced death as the only choice of survival. By looking at how each of these nations managed the enslavement in their societies, it is hard to believe that the Spanish and the Aztec shared any similarities about it.…
“The dismal drum of Huichilobos sounded again, accompanied by conches, horns, and trumpet-like instruments. It was a terrifying sound, and when we looked at the tall cue (temple-pyramid) from which it came we saw our comrades who had been captured in Cortes’ defeat being dragged up the steps to be sacrificed. When they had haled them up to a small platform in front of the shrine where they kept their accursed idols we saw them put plums on the heads of many of them; and then they made them dance with a sort of fan in front of Huichilobos. Then after they had danced the papas (Aztec priests) laid them down on their backs on some narrow stones of sacrifice and, cutting open their chests, drew out their palpitating hearts which they offered to the idols before them. Then they kicked the bodies down the steps, and the Indian butchers who were waiting below cut off…
Don't Matter: Akon - The society didn't want to see the African Americans and White folks living together. However, some wanted to be equal. Talk about the prejudice and how separated they two were and how some tried to stay equal. (Atticus and Calpurnia, and Scout and Jem sitting with the African Americans during the trial are two examples.)…
The emphatic, stirring conclusion to The Firebird leaves the listener with the sense that a favorable event of great significance has occurred, or that a long-sought-for goal has been achieved. This effect is achieved mainly through Stravinsky’s peculiar choices of instrumentation and dynamic markings.…