It is, first and foremost, important to address how subversive Sor Juana is, not only in her gratefulness to “Sor Filotea” for her entirely “unwarranted” and “unexpected” favor of reviewing Sor Juana’s opinion piece on old sermons, but also in her now allegedly trite but at the time very new and solid belief and argument that women, though believed to be feeble-minded and too simple for higher education, were equally as thirsty and yearning for knowledge as their male …show more content…
Sor Juana pushes on, stating that she could not possibly begin to express her thanks for this oh-so thoughtful response from her fellow sister and mentions that while women have never been afforded greater schooling or considered worthy of reading texts like Genesis or the Song of Solomon seeing as it would be in direct conflict with every aspect of her sex and opposed to her ability to read or write. After all, she has only ever written “reluctantly” as she states in her response. She says all of this, agreeing that she is without credit for any knowledge that she possesses because, like all women at the time, she has never been afforded the right to learn all that she pleases through legislation, yet she possesses all of this knowledge anyways, but why? Why does Sor Juana know anything about science or philosophy or God for that matter? Why do you have any women? Why do you need to be a member? She tells us that she is. She says that “this natural impulse” was placed in her by