Preview

'Sorry Speech And No More Boomerang'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
'Sorry Speech And No More Boomerang'
During the National week of Reconciliation [May 27-June 3], Australians reflect on the past issues to do with the Aboriginals and European settlement. I believe that these three texts should be included in your exhibition for Reconciliation Week. These texts are “The Rabbits” [2000] written by Shaun Tan and John Marsden, Kevin Rudd’s “Sorry Speech” [2008] and “No More Boomerang” [2002], written by Kath Walker. These three text have a significant meaning and recognize the significance of the British Invasion and the damage the invasion caused to the aboriginals and the aboriginal community.

“The Rabbits” by Shaun Tan and John Marsden, shows how the Aboriginals slowly, overtime lost their land to the British. In this story it shows the dispossession
…show more content…
He was trying to heal the relationship between the Aboriginals and the European and Australians (white people). Kevin Rudd used many different techniques throughout the speech to show how he wanted to reconcile the relationship throughout the speech. He used words such and ‘we’ to show how he was addressing the nation as a whole. During the speech his voice would change his voice between various tones such as respect, disappointment and sad, and a reflective tone of voice. He did this to make sure everyone knew that he was truly sorry for the way that the aboriginals were treated. In one particular section of the speech Rudd references the past of a woman called, Nanna Nungala Fejo. Kevin Rudd had gone to visit her to learn about her experiences growing up during the time of the “Stolen Generation”. In the visit to Rudd she tells him how she forgave the British for what they had done and how what they had done was a very big mistake and that separation from her family and friends was very traumatic. But she was able to overcome all the hardship and forgive the British. This speech is the perfect example on how the relationship between the Aboriginals and the Europeans can be healed through one person's actions (in this example, a speech). It shows how we should forgive everyone for what they have done and how everyone in …show more content…
Kath walker was apart of the stolen generation, she would write poems about her experiences during this time. The poem depicts how the aboriginals were not allowed to hunt, use boomerangs or spears, they were forced to become civilised like the Europeans were.Her poem ‘No more Boomerang’ showed her perspective of what life was like during that time. She would repetitively use the words “no more” to show how the Aboriginals had to become civilised and leave their old life behind and become like the Europeans. She would also use the words “now we” over and over. These words show how they were getting forced to become something that they did not want to be. They had to live a fake life pretending to be something that they were forced to be. Kath Walker compares the difference between the European settlers and the Aboriginals, she compares the technology and utilities that the europeans bring to what the aboriginals use. For example, Walker uses the the words “no more firesticks” which references how the aboriginals would use fire to produce their light and heat. She also says “now all electric”, this shows how the europeans brought new technology that was life changing for the people who lived in australia. The only downside to this new technology is that all the Aboriginals had to conform to what the europeans wanted them to use. This poem showed us how the Europeans changed australia for the aboriginals. that all the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Faith Bandler's Speech

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This speech is important and crucial to highlight the persisting flaw that still prevents the Aboriginal people and white Australian nation from reconciling and ultimately focuses on advancing towards this reconciliation. Bandler’s speech is important to society because the Aboriginal people were the original founding fathers of this nation, who had their society torn up by the “terra nullius” theory and white man dominance. So it is only fair that the Aboriginal society be offered a voice and support throughout their hardship,…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bulgandry In Australia

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a national reconciliation week that helps us build stronger and better relationships between indigenous people and the wider Australian community. The Aboriginals go back 50,000 years. The British were unable to recognise the rights of the aboriginals and the connection they had with their land. They declared the land they were living on, was terra nullius which means the land belonged to nobody. When the colonisation happened by 1920 there was only 60,00 abogrinal and Torres strait islanders. When the British settlement happened, between 1910-1970 the abogrinal children were taken away from their families. The colonisation had a devasting impact on the indigenous people. Between 1788-1900 the indigenous population had dropped by 90%. Around 3 out of 4 indigenous people didn’t make it through the colonisation. The colonisation had introduced new diseases such as; small pox, measles and influenza. It was estimated that around 20,000 aboriginals where killed as a result of the violence. In 1835, john batman who was a pastoralist and explorer tried to make a treaty with the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War of 1812 was one of the worst-fought wars in United States history because – of widespread disunity…

    • 4727 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the initial announcement of the apology caused a split in the Liberal party, as some believed that it would create a guilty culture in Australia. Yet, Judi Moylan, who was the former Liberal Minister, said “I think as a nation we owe an apology. We shouldn't be thinking about it as an individual apology — it's an apology that is coming from the nation state because it was governments that did these things.” The apology was then considered necessary. At 9:30 on the day of the speech, Kevin Rudd began the apology. “...The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians. We apologise especially for the removal of ATSI children from their families, their communities and their country...We the parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation….” The speech was a significant moment in ATSI peoples lives, as, according the to The Bringing Them Home Report, this was the first step to healing and was largely symbolic and important in ATSI…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Noel Pearson

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson’s speech, ‘An Australian History for us All,’ explores the divides between our community and the issues that prevent us as a nation from achieving reconciliation. Ultimately, throughout his exordium Pearson is excessively humble, ‘it is my honour to have been invited… Alas, I cannot promise my teacher’s rigour ,’ this diminution of his prominent political position equalises Pearson with his audience. He successfully characterises himself as being selflessly modest, a successful tool in capturing our attention, his choice to do this in the exordium is also an example of kairos, his appealing attitude is naturally attractive, guaranteeing our fixated attention throughout the duration of his speech. Pearson additionally employs a variety of quotes to both enforce his credibility and portray society’s ignorant attitude towards reconciliation. We see this when he quotes Professor Bill Stanner, the ‘Great Australian Silence,’ becomes a metaphor of our refusal to address the Aboriginal struggle on a national level, objectifying the Australian nation as absent minded. Furthermore, Pearson makes noticeable appeals to pathos and logos, encouraging an emotional and logical response identifiable by all of us. Pearson in his battle for reconciliation, provides syllogistic reasoning and structure on solving the inherent ‘guilt’ issue, ‘it is not about guilt. It is about opening our hearts a little bit… and to have an open and generous heart…means that when you acknowledge the wrongs of the past, you might try to do so ungrudgingly… there must be some respect for that.’ Additionally, the inclusive pronouns that Pearson employs in this statement make his proposed solution exclusive, applying to both indigenous and non indigenous peoples as such he unites his audience, generating logos through the universal nature and structural flow of his statement. Additionally, Pearson goes on to compare the reasoning he provides to the internationally notorious issue of Jewish…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia’s attitude towards the rights and freedoms of Aboriginals has changed drastically from 1920 to the present. It is evident that Australia has made a greater effort throughout the years, to bridge the gap between the rights and of Aboriginals and the rest of Australia. This has been improved by the implementation of different policies such as the Protection policy, Assimilation, Integration, Self Determination and Reconciliation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Carmel Bird organised the report in a simplified non-fiction text form for regular Australians to be able to discover how the past government’s policy deeply affected the culture, identity and lives of Indigenous people. The composer used persuasive text to convey different emotional stories and perspectives to convince the readers of her subjective point of view. One of the textual features is the order of the texts. The texts start from the perspectives of the Aboriginals who were affected, positioning responders to feel sympathy for them. And by putting the speech of John Howard about avoiding apologising to these people at the end makes him look unsympathetic. This further reinforces Bird’s attempt to convince Australians to share her perception of accepting Indigenous people as equals and work towards reconciliation.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIPAA Compliance Analysis

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The healthcare industry has wide range stakeholders like hospitals, labs and insurers, each having their own distinct operating landscape. Being healthcare providers, all of them are required to comply with HIPAA policies and standards. Following a hybrid approach for implementing HIPAA would help these different healthcare entities manage their compliance related activities better. The risk based model which is easily scalable would enable entities to perform risk assessment based on their operating landscape, while the checklist would allow all these entities to easily evaluate their compliance with HIPAA. For example, hospitals have to perform far more robust risk assessment when compared to that of health insurers or labs as they operate…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A key achievement in Paul Keating’s leadership was the recognition of Indigenous Australian’s rights and acknowledging their position in society. Keating established a Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, working alongside Aboriginal Australians, which sought to implement different strategies to ameliorate the injustices. In June 1992 the High Court recognised Aboriginal land rights by making a decision that native title existed in the Mabo case. Keating supported this notion and delivered the Redfern Speech in December 1992, apologising for the wrongdoings of white society and recognising Aboriginal rights. This was a significant moment and is still recognised today because it was the first time in Australian history that the government attempted to reconcile the relationship with Indigenous Australians. Today, people reflect on this speech and can still find areas that need to be improved upon to ensure an equal society.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his speech, Noel Pearson addresses the need to acknowledge the past mistreatment of Australian Aboriginals. As an Indigenous Australian politician, Pearson gave his speech at the Chancellor’s Club Dinner in the University of Western Sydney to advance equality of Aborigines. Pearson quickly introduces his purpose, “our popular understanding of the colonial past is central to the moral and political turbulence we are still grappling with as Australians”. The illustrative use of turbulence is used to highlight the prevalence of past disharmonies and he uses the inclusive pronoun “we” as a synecdoche for all Australians to unify the audience. By directly quoting authorities such as John Howard and Bill Stanner, Pearson supplements his ethos and strengthens his case by evaluating both sides of the situation. The metaphor, “cult of forgetfulness” has negative connotations in order to challenge the common social mindset regarding the recognition of the past and induce a desire for change. Pearson effectively uses a cumulative list, “You have taken from us not just our land and not just all of the icons of Indigenous Australia…” to illustrate past injustices. The diction is divisive between Indigenous and European Australians, but deliberate emphasis is placed on the past tense to suggest hope for the future. Thus Pearson…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module a Speeches Essay

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Speakers who encourage us to consider significant Australian issues deliver key themes and ever-lasting notions through rhetoric techniques which persuade their audience. Noel Pearson’s 1996 speech, ‘An Australian History for us All,’ challenges the treatment of Indigenous Australians in the past, present and future with the proposal for an intellectual approach to acknowledge previous injustices. He argues that the principles of racial equality, justice and morality should matter to Australians, and therefore the lack of recognition for Indigenous mistreatment hinders our ability to ‘move on.’ Although for alternate reasons, Paul Keating’s, ‘A Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier’(1993) also encourages us to consider what should matter as he honours the Australian war-dead by reaffirming the Australian ideals of mateship, courage and resilience in the simultaneous bid to unite a population who were at the ‘crossroads’ and in search for our national identity. Both these speakers encourage us to consider major Australian issues and reveal their importance in the past, present and future.…

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Australians associate and put emphasis on the idea of reconciliation between indigenous Australians and non indigenous Australians with the federal governments formal reconciliation policy in 1991. However the events of symbolic reconciliation play an equal part if not more significant part of this reconciliation process by bridging the 'gap' between indigenous people and non indigenous people of Australia both in past and present times. Without these fundamental symbolic events of reconciliation it can be argued that the federal governments formal reconciliation policy and other practical reconciliation efforts may have never eventuated. This concept is elucidated in the text which not only highlights the value of these symbolic reconciliation…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry, T. (2009, April 29). Characteristics of sex-related homicides in Alaska. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6(2), 57-65. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01069.x…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the time that Europeans landed in Australia ‘Pastoralists were pushing into Indigenous territory, robbing Aboriginal people of the land they had lived on and nurtured for thousands of years. ‘But Aboriginal communities did not just stand by as the land which they had formed rich bonds with, both spiritually and physically, was taken from their hands. Through a mixture of fear and hatred of the Aboriginals, European settlers engaged in many brutal clashes with them to attempt to seize their land. The Myall Creek massacre and the genocide that occurred in Van Diemens land are two prominent examples of the vicious and inhumane treatment of Aboriginals and the story of Pemulwuy is a reminder of the courage shown that was shown in adversity by many Aboriginal people.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays