Preview

Sources of Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sources of Law
3/25/2010



Every lawyer needs to know where to find the Law, in relation to a particular issue, when he needs it. Hence, it is vital for the lawyer operating in a specific legal system to know what the sources of law are in that system.



1

3/25/2010

Material Sources of Law Formal

Historical Legislation Case-Law Custom

Legislation

A body of binding rules of Law

Constitution

Primary Legislation

Subsidiary Legislation

2

3/25/2010

THE CONSTITUTION

3

3/25/2010



Supreme Law of the Land Section 2 of the Constitution:
“This Constitution is the supreme law of Mauritius, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution, that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.”





The Supreme Court is the guardian of the Constitution It is empowered to strike down any enactment that is unconstitutional e.g. Mahboob v Govt of Mauritius (1982) MR 135





The Constitution organises the institutional life of the state by creating the most important institutions of the State, together with the framework for their effective co-existence. It embodies the concept of “Separation of Powers” by setting out the functions of the 3 organs of the State. It enshrines a Bill of Rights to safeguard basic human rights of the individual in its Chapter II





4

3/25/2010



The supremacy of the Constitution however is not absolute. It may be amended with the support of a “qualified majority”. Section 47 of the Constitution permits the National Assembly to alter the Constitution.



(1) Subject to this section, Parliament may alter this Constitution. (2) A Bill for an Act of Parliament to alter any of the following provisions of this Constitution (a) this section; (b) sections 28 to 31, 37 to 46, 56 to 58 other than 57(2), 64, 65, 71, 72 and 108; (c) Chapters II, VII, VIII and IX; (d) the First Schedule, and (e) Chapter XI, to the extent that it relates to any of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution of the United Kingdom is the sum of laws and principles that make up the body politic of the United Kingdom. It concerns both the relationship between the individual and the state, and the functioning of the legislature, the executive and judiciary.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way in which the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose is that it lacks restraint…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison, the majority said that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which gives the Supreme Court judicial review over writs of mandamus, attempted to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Article III of the Constitution does not give the Supreme Court authority to review writs. Therefore, the two laws were in conflict. The Supreme Court’s duty is to decide cases according to the Constitution rather than the law when the two conflict. So if a law is found to be in conflict with the Constitution, then the law is void.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the entrenchment of the Charter impacted the judiciary to become more powerful, but also through the concept of judicial supremacy as opposed to parliamentary supremacy. First of all, “ the concept of judicial supremacy does not focus on the specific act of review itself. Judicial supremacy refers to the “obligation of coordinate officials not only to obey that [judicial] ruling but to follow its reasoning in future deliberations” (qtd. Whittington. par: 12). Essentially, judicial supremacy allows judges to make any “ constitutional authority and stems directly from the 1982 Constitution Act”(Clio’s Current, par: 1). Whereas parliamentary supremacy refers to the legislative body being the supreme leaders, and law-makers in relationship…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus to state that no parliament may bind its sucessors is to assume that all future parliament same attribute of sovereignty as the present parliament .but why must this be? The problem is less intractable than the comparable conundrum of whether an can bind its itself, for even sovereign parliament are human institution and there is nothing inherently impossible in the idea of a supreme parliament make fresh constitution arrangement for the future.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth of the seven articles of Constitution gives us the opportunity to “change”, amend or add to the Constitution according to the growth and changes within the nations. Because we have this ability does not mean we can amend everything or anything we do not agree with, the amendments or additions must reflect on meeting the needs of the people, basically it must be necessary.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Still Works

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When changing the Constitution Act Is not it makes people think that if you can change laws in the Constitution, then the Constitution is no longer the supreme value. I think you can work worn only when we'll announce it as a supreme value, something above the law, something important. Constitution can work only if written carefully and ancient thought that when we write something that is above the law, we must take…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution should be allowed to be changed but only on a vote; the President or the senate would not be allowed to make changes without the peoples vote. Along with that, it must only be changed to the needs of the country not its…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laws in Today's Society

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The three branches of the government are put into play by a system of checks and balances in order to keep each other and the laws that they uphold in check. Even though each law is not fool proof, it is better to have them set into place so that the citizens of the country are still in charge of their government; not the other way around.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Constitutions have two primary functions one to prescribe the basic structure and powers of a particular government body and to protect certain rights of individuals and businesses from government encroachment (Melvin, 2011).” It is also an overriding law because its foundations are built on the principles of a government—federal or state.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The day after you got married, the doctors realize you have a terminal illness. Your hair starts to fall out, followed with unbearable pain almost everyday, and you’re looking weaker and weaker by the minute. You think, It would be much easier to just let go than go through this pain everyday. Well, a solution would be asking your local doctor/s about assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is the suicide of a patient suffering from an incurable disease, affected by the taking of lethal drugs provided by a doctor for this purpose. In some states, like California, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington. Although a patient has to have six or less months to live to be qualified for assisted suicide, it would be better to end the suffering…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act. (Bean, 2009). Having had only a few amendments in 1978, 1982, and 1988, the…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law and legal system of Mauritius are an unusual hybrid and a remarkable instance of comparative law in action. As a consequence of its history, as an overseas possession of France from 1715 to 1810 and as a British colony from 1814 until it achieved independence within the Commonwealth in 1968, its law and legal system reflect the legal traditions of both its former colonial rulers. In general terms, Mauritian private law is based on the French Code Civil while public law and commercial law are based on English law: an example of what has recently been labelled a “bi-systemic legal system”. The Constitution, a version of the Westminster export model, was originally monarchical. It was amended in 1991 and Mauritius became a republic within the Commonwealth in 1992.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays