Preview

Southeastern Land Fund, Inc. V. Real Estate World, Inc. 237 Ga. 227, 227 S.E.2d 340 (Ga, 1976).

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Southeastern Land Fund, Inc. V. Real Estate World, Inc. 237 Ga. 227, 227 S.E.2d 340 (Ga, 1976).
Case name: Southeastern Land Fund, Inc. V. Real Estate World, Inc. 237 Ga. 227, 227 S.E.2d 340 (Ga, 1976).
Facts:
The Seller brought an action against the Buyer. The allegations were about a contract of sale of a real estate. The seller’s action sought to recover the price of $45,000 plus the interests; as well as to recover their lawyer’s fees upon a promissory note referred in the contract. The buyer’s appeal was founded on the basis that the trial judged erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the seller and denying a summary judgment and a counterclaim from the buyer.
Issue Statement:
Whether seller defaulted on their obligation to supply the marketable title and thus was in breach of the contract? And whether the contract provisions that the seller and the court relied on to grant the motion for summary judgment was to be regarded as a penalty provision and therefore void under Georgia law? Whether the trial judge erred in his judgment?
Rule of Law or Legal Principle Applied:
Code Ann: § 20-1402 & §§ 20-1403 provides: “Damages are given as compensation for the injury sustained. If the parties agree in their contract what the damages for a breach shall be, they are said to be liquidated, and unless the agreement violates some principle of law, the parties are bound thereby”. In addition to the above factors is that both parties are bound by their agreement. Code Ann: §§ 378: To bar specific performance there should be explicit language in the liquidated damages provision that it is to be the sole remedy.
Application:
While a right of recovery was still pending, the judge erred in granting summary of judgment. The order of Certiorari was granted as the court considered a real estate sales contract as one that allows payment of earnest money. The court held that this was a provision of liquidated damages. The Court of Appeals held that such a provision in a contract of sale was a penalty and could not be enforced under Georgia laws. The court

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This appeal is based on a previous trial for the stop of payments due to in an abrupt change in rent prices, and was brought to the Florida district court of appeals by Alan and Nancy Garrett, the new owners of a mobile home park. They appeal a final judgment in favor of forty-six tenants from the mobile home park who refused to perform payment. The couple asked for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages coming from the agreements for the mobile home lots.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ISSUES: Whether or not the Trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Brown Realty Company will proceed for the reason that Donnie McGraw argues that the trail court erred when they granted Brown motion for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 9 Paper

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Theresa Metzger appeals from an order entered by the Superior Court of Clayton County granting partial summary judgment to Americredit Financial Services, Inc. on her claim for conversion based on the alleged wrongful repossession of her vehicle. Metzger contends that the superior court erred by failing to conclude that she took her vehicle free of Americredit's security interest under the special good faith purchaser rule for goods covered by a certificate of title set forth in OCGA § 11-9-337(1). We agree and reverse.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case involves a consideration which is the inducement to make a contract enforceable. Pearsall and Alexander had an agreement to share to proceeds. But when Alexander had a $20,000 winning ticket, he refused to give Pearsall anything, which led Pearsall to sue Alexander for a breach of an agreement. Court ruled in favor of Pearsall, and Alexander must share the winnings enforced by valid agreement. I think Court was right on the decision based on a fact that they always had mutual agreement that they would share the winnings. Although since none of the agreements are written, anyone could have denied about having any kind of agreement at all. It would have dragged this case lot longer.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What objective evidence was there to support the defendants’ contention that they were just kidding when they agreed to sell the farm?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motion for Summary

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on the courtroom observations there appeared to be insuff evience to grant the defendant a summary judgment. The facts of the case are that Edward Hart displayed visual signs of…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of appellee subcontractor, finding that promissory estoppel was a viable cause of action in a bid construction case. The court found that the award of damages based on this theory was factually supported by the evidence, and that there was statutory authority for the award of attorneys' fees. The determination of the rate of prejudgment interest also was proper.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 416

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Held: there was a breach of condition as the goods did not correspond with the description.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After due hearing, the trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and ordered defendants spouses, jointly and severally, to pay to the former the sum of P4,500.00, with legal interest thereon, plus the amount of P450.00 as reasonable attorneys' fees, and…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes. the defendant was acting merely as the agent for the plaintiffs throughout the entire transaction; that the purchase of the land was made not only with their full knowledge and consent, but at their suggestion; and that after the purchase had been effected, the plaintiffs, with full knowledge of the facts, approved and ratified the actions of their agent in the premises. There is nothing in the record which would indicate that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care and diligence in the performance of his duty as such agent, or that he undertook to guarantee the vendors title to the land purchased by direction of the…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Petition Sample

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Notwithstanding repeated demands, mortgagor failed and/or refused to pay her mortgage obligations and all interests and penalty due thereon up to the present time. Photocopy of the last Demand Letter is hereto attached and made as an integral part hereof as Annex “__”;…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, neither Section 74 of the Act nor any of the above authorities cited at the Bar dispenses with the pre-condition of actual damage or loss being suffered for awarding compensation. Only proof of amount of actual loss and damage has been dispensed with where the contract itself specifics the amount or provide for a penalty or forfeiture of the sum…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays