Preview

Southern Manifesto Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Southern Manifesto Research Paper
After World War 2 the United States was changing in many ways. The US changed socially, economically, technological, etc . A huge part that changed in US history was the social problems. Segregation was a huge problem, women’s rights, and equality amongst different types of people.One huge conflict that occurred was the Southern Manifesto. The Southern Manifesto was the disagreement between the southern states wanting segregated schools and the Congress writing the Brown Ruling which said that there shall not be anymore segregated schools anymore in the South. In an act to change the ruling, Strom Thurmond and Richard Russell wrote the final version of the Southern Manifesto stating many points that what the Congress was doing was unlawful. …show more content…
What the southern states want also goes against the ideas that our founding fathers built this great country. Although i can see where their point view is coming from about the rights of the states, but this problem of social segregation needs to be fixed nation wide not just in certain states, therefore the federal government should intervene with the states. The federal government solving an issue through the Supreme Court for the whole nation is the best way to solve problems. The United States was built off liberty, freedom, rights, and equality, and what the southern states want is going against the idea of equality. Although segregation wasn’t just present in schools but also in other public places, this small step to unifying races in schools was beginning of the end of segregation and beginning of equality amongst everyone. This conflict really was the beginning of desegregation and equality. After this conflict many riots broke out, protests, the Rosa Parks incident, civil right movements,etc. Another reason why this segregation thing in the US was wrong, was because World War 2 had just ended and one main thing the US was fighting against Germany was RACISM! The US was fighting racism in Germany, for the Jews. Racism wasn’t the only thing the US was fighting against in Europe, but it did play an important role. The US fought against racism and equality, but in our own country at the time was full of racism and equality, which showed that the US was just being a hypocrite. Also many african americans fought in the wara and all of them realized what was going on back home, and it wasn’t right and something needed to change. Although the southern states did make some great points, but everything they believed in was wrong, therefore i believe what the Congress was doing at the time was the right thing to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina’s argument was that it shouldn’t have to follow the Constitution if other states weren’t following it themselves. The Constitution was created as a whole to govern every individual states under one Declaration. In the Constitution it stated that if a slave were to runaway to another state it was that state duty to return the slave to its rightful owner. However in “ Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union,” its states “In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed”. Since several northern states such as Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island have failed to obey the Constitution South Carolina felt justified in their…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation a moral or a political decision? Provide a thorough explanation that shows you understand what was going on both politically and socially during this time. This must be a minimum of 75 words.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln did not believe that the south could legally secede from union because the states could not get rid of a government they made without collapsing anarchy. Lincoln called the Union a “contract” (Lincoln 2) between the states and the contract could not be dissolved without the consent of all the states. Since the North did not believe the southern slave states had ample reason to secede, all the states were not in accord, so the “contract” (Lincoln 2) was still valid. If the legal matter was not reason enough against secession, the resulting anarchy from a new government should have been a deterrent. The federal government was not able to please everyone, but no government would be able to please everyone. If the new southern government could form on basis of pleasing everyone, it would dissolve into chaos. The new government would be mob rule and it would encourage other factions to break off from the union if they became dissatisfied. It would plunge both countries into a mad power scramble and it could not be allowed even if it was legal, which it was…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like I said before the South broke compromises to keep slavery going (Doc 1). The South felt like they had rights and powers the government could not deny (Doc 5). The South felt overpowered by the government and that is why they overridden compromises and led to states seceding from the Union. Southern states did not want follow the rules of the government so it could start a war and make them want to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nation's stance on Human rights was also changed forever as the war forced the nation to address the issue of slavery leading to its abolition and soon after laws allowing anyone regardless of race to vote.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basis of the opposition to the Brown decision as expressed in The Southern Manifesto is the abuse of the judicial power towards race. The Supreme Court “[exercised] their naked judicial power and substituted their personal political and social ideas for the established law of the land.” The Supreme Court basically overruled the authority and took away state rights about the segregation of schools; furthermore, this means the Supreme Court was in theory not following the laws of the Constitution. If the federal government implemented Brown, then the power of the states would be usurp, or taken. The states would not be allowed to decide the kind of education system they want to use because the federal government would be the overall decision…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Old South had had troubles with the United States since the beginning of the 19th century. Unfortunately everything culminated in the elections of 1860, where president Lincoln was elected, representing the Republican Party, and South Carolina started something that would lead to a disastrous finale, secession. Since the Republican Party was sectional (from the North), the South was confident that Lincoln would never have their best interests at heart. Following South Carolina’s footsteps, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas seceded as well. Which eventually lead the United States to fight for their Union. As a proof that they could, and wanted to be independent, the Confederacy adopted a Constitution in 1861, which was very similar to the one of the United States, except that it had many problems with taxation and states versus federal rights. The South being able to create their own government, with president Jefferson Davis in command, demonstrated the fact that the South not only yearned for their freedom, but also that they were prepared to defend their new acquired sense of independence at all costs. The Confederacy displayed their determination and high sense of morale in Fort Sumter,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes when a ruling authority decide what they think is the “best” for their country, sectionalism evolves. Sectionalismisloyalty to the interests of one's own region or section of the country, rather than the nation as a whole. In simple words,it means one would only strive toimprove their town or area, rather than improving the country. An example of sectionalism would be during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The decisions made during Jackson’s president caused sectionalism itself to manifest. Signs of sectionalism showed after Congress released the Tariff of 1828, the vetoing of the re-chartering of the Bank of the United States, and Jackson refusing to admit Texas as a state.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the lower South should be able to secede peacefully. As a Southern Democrat, I believe that it is not only the right of the lower South states to secede, but secession is needed now. This secession is very important to the development of the lower South. The Constitution gives states’ rights, and just because the lower South is not in 100% agreement with the Northern states, that does not mean that our rights can be taken away (page 336 in our book). Now, let’s fast forward to President Taylor’s plan to allow California and New Mexico to choose if they want to be a slave state or a free state (page 635 of our assigned readings).…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern state legislatures had passed and maintained a series of discriminatory requirements and practices that had disenfranchised most of the millions of African Americans across…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Dbq Essay

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There is certainly no shortage of opinion on whether the southern states had the right to secede from the union in 1860-61. After all, northern state governments as well as the election of Lincoln placed the south into a defensive posture to protect their particular institution. Secession has a long history in world governmental intercourse and the founding of American independence did not inoculate them from the threats of secession. States began to discuss secession even before the ink had dried on the new constitution. Justification, regardless as to the state threatening secession, was founded on the belief that the states had the right to govern themselves and the right of the people to abolish a government when it becomes destructive…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The culture of the Southern United States, or Southern culture, is a subculture of the United States. The combination of its unique history and the fact that many Southerners maintain—and even nurture—an identity separate from the rest of the country has led to its being the most studied and written-about region of the U.S.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II many African-Americans moved North to take advantage of the many jobs. This migration continued throughout the 50s and 60s. In the North African-Americans increased their voting strength. When African-American soldiers returned home they also wanted to end racial discrimination. Their fight would have a small victory because in 1948 Harry S. Truman ordered the desegregation of the armed forces and called for federal laws to advance civil rights. Even though Congress rejected his appeals for legislation, this was the first time since Reconstruction that a president had made a move towards desegregation. In the 1940s many were ready for an end to school segregation. These people had their homes and churches burned and many…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea of Southernization came from the observation that "Southern" values and beliefs were becoming more important to the success of the government, reaching a climax in the 1990s, with a Democratic president and vice-president from the South, and Congressional leaders in both parties originating in the South. Some would agree that Southern values started to become more and more important in national elections through the early 21st century. American journalists started to use the term "Southernization" in the late 2000s to describe the political and cultural effects. Credit is given to the American South for different values and beliefs, including religious fundamentalism, and patriotism or nationalism. Other than the cultural influence, many would comply that the South had permeated the national political stage.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays