Preview

Spark

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Spark
On 1 July 2008 Cortina Ltd acquired all the issued shares of Turin Ltd for $200 000. At acquisition date the recorded equity of Turin Ltd was: $ Share capital 150 000 Plant Maintenance Reserve 30 000 Retained earnings 87 500

At this date all identifiable net assets of Turin Ltd were recorded at fair value except for:

Carrying Amount Fair Value $ $ Inventory 39 000 51 000 Machinery (cost $250 000) 195 000 210 000

On 12 March 2008, a lawsuit claiming damages of $50 000 was lodged against Turin Ltd by one of its customers. A court hearing is scheduled for January 2009. Turin Ltd has not recognised any liability for damages arising from the lawsuit. On 1 July 2008, Cortina Ltd assessed potential damages at a fair value of $35 000

Events occurring subsequent to acquisition date.

Year ended 30 June 2009
Inventory on hand at 1 July 2008 was all sold prior to 30 June 2009.
The manufacturing plant’s useful life was re-assessed on acquisition date to six years.
A bonus dividend of $50 000 was issued by the directors of Turin Ltd on 6 June 2009. The dividend was funded from retained earnings on hand at 1 July 2009.
On 15 January 2009, the court found Turin Ltd guilty of negligence and awarded damages of $35 000 payable in two installments - $15 000 on 31 March 2009 and $20 000 on 31 March 2010. The first installment was duly made.

Year ended 30 June 2010
The manufacturing plant owned at 1 July 2008 was sold by Turin Ltd on 31 December 2010 for $80 000.
The second installment of damages was paid.
On 17 June 2011, the directors of Turin decided to transfer $15 000 from the plant and maintenance reserve back to retained earnings.

Required

1. Prepare the acquisition analysis at 1 July 2008.
2. Prepare the consolidation worksheet journal entries as at 1 July 2008.
3. Prepare the consolidation worksheet journal entries for the year ended 30 June 2009.
4. Prepare the consolidation worksheet journal entries for the year

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ameripride Case Summary

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court entered an order finding: The amount subject to equitable allocation totaling at $15,508,912.36. The court calculated the amount by combining AmeriPride's investigation, remediation costs, then adding the $10.25 milllion in AmeriPride settlement to Huhtamaki and Cal-Am. the court then deducted $3.25 million AmeriPride received in settling its claims against Chromalloy and Petrolane. Applying the Uniform Cotribution Among Tortfeasor's Act's ("UCATA") pro tanto approach to equitably account for these settlements. Next, the Court apportioned the liability fifty-fifty between TEO and AmeriPride and holding TEO responsible for paying one half of all future cleanup costs. The Court also ordered TEO to pay prejudgement interest to AmeriPride "in amounts calculated in accordance with 42 U.S.C. §9607."…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages

    If a company has ending inventory of $25,000, purchases during the year of $95,000, and beginning…

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    comm 450 assignment 1

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b) Kleinberg Corporation was sued by a customer for product liability. The customer sought damages of $1,500,000. At the its December 31, 2012, year-end, the company obtained an opinion from their lawyers that the customer had a 75% likelihood of winning the suit with the damages likely to be assessed in the range of $800,000 to $1,200,000. Legal costs were estimated to amount to a further $150,000. In late January, before the company’s financial statements had been finalized, the company settled the claim with the customer for $800,000. The lawyers estimated their fees to be reduced to $80,000 because the matter was settled without going to court.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Berrys Bug Blaster

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Retained Earnings | $1,062,095.71 | | Net Income | $493,139.75 | | Total…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written Assignment 2

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rossi Inc. is a diversified manufacturer of industrial products. In 2008, Rossi updated its asbestos litigation liability, including the costs of settlement payments and defense costs relating to currently pending claims and future claims projected to be filed against the Company through 2017 for losses incurred to date. Before 2008, the Company’s previous estimate was for claims projected to be filed through 2011. As part of the 2008 update to the asbestos litigation liability, Rossi engaged Thompson and Associates, a consulting firm, to serve as an external specialist to estimate the claims liability for December 31, 2008. As a result of the 2008 update and the external specialist claims estimate, the Company significantly increased its recorded asbestos litigation liability by $586 million, arriving at a total liability estimate of $1,055 million as of December 31, 2008. During 2009, additional payments against the reserve reduced the recorded liability to $962 million. As of December 31, 2009, the Company performed an analysis of the asbestos litigation reserve and determined that the asbestos litigation liability should remain at $962 million. In 2009, Rossi Inc.’s average cost per claim litigation increased from $29,000 in 2008, to $34,000 due to management’s aggressive approach. This resulted in Thompson concluding that the litigation liability account should have a carrying value of $1,124 Million instead of $962 Million. Management of Rossi Inc. thinks that there aggressive approach to litigation claims in 2009 and revised defense strategy will decrease litigation cost and defense cost in the future.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ACCTG 300 HW

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages

    W Inc, “W”, is a competitor of M International, “M”. In 2007, W filed a claim against M for patent infringement. By the end of that year, M estimated a $15-20 million loss, with $17 million being the most likely. On September 2009, a jury determined M has to pay $18.5 million in damages. Two months later, M filed an appeal to overturn the jury’s verdict. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of M and overturned the $18.5 million judgment. W filed a petition for a re-hearing in January 2011, but the matter was closed in February, after the appellate judges declined the petition.…

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - They bought 600 shares of the stock CCC on January 15, 2008 for $13,000 and sold those same shares on March 15, 2008 for $12,100.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    X

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game; and in failing to find that Bourque was guilty of contributory negligence. Defendant Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in finding him negligent and in finding that the injury to plaintiff Bourque occurred four to five feet away from the second base position in the general direction of the pitcher's mound. Allstate further contends that the trial court erred in finding coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hocker. He has suffered a total disability which altered his life and affected each member of his family, his beloved wife and loving daughter. It’s just simple negligence, but it had been a calculated scheme of deceit, defraud and oppression where CIC aimed only to protects its financial interests and forfeited Mr. Hocker’s legal rights and interests. Either the jury or the judge in this case, after hearing testimonies, reviewing and the material facts would certainly render a judgment against defendant CIC without…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Macys vs Nordstroms

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages

    e. The largest source of cash from financing activities was through the issuance of common stock providing $43 million. F-7, 10-K…

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hurst Company Case Study

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On December 31, 2008, the total fair value of the securities was equal to its cost. In 2009, the following transactions occurred.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial court rendered judgement in favor of plaintiff against both defendants(Duplechin and Duplechin's liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company). Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game and was guilty of contributory negligence. Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in negligent. Allstate further contends that the coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carbolic Smoke Ball

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issue was between Louisa Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. Back at 1892 , There was a big influenza in United Kingdom caused over 1 million people get killed . Carbolic Smoke Ball Company made a cure which was a steam ball that u inhale 3 times in a day after two weeks time you can not get any influenza . Company made an advertisenment via newspaper named Pall Mall Gazette which was including all those details and claiming that it would pay £100 to anyone who got sick with influenza after using its product according to the instructions provided with it. Any disease caused by taking cold after using carbolic smoke balls three times daily for to weeks £100 will be rewarded by Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to any person who contracts the increasing epidemic influenza colds. £1000 is deposited with the Alliance Bank, showing our sincerity in the matter. During this tragic influenza many smoke ball has been sold any many families were already tried it but Mrs Louisa Elizabeth Carlill Saw the advertisenment bought one of the balls and used it for three times daily for 2 months after she catched the flu on January 1892. She proceed £100 from Smoke Ball Company. They ignored two letters sended by a solicitor but on a third request anonymous letter received by Mrs Carlill asked if she used smoke balls properly. Company had a complete comfidence on their product untill Mrs. Carlill brought a claim to the court.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spark

    • 4993 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Narayanhiti Durbar is originally Narayanhiti Royal Palace which used to be the primary residence of the royal family of Nepal during the monarchical system. On June 1, 2001, the royal family massacre took place where King Birendra and Queen Aishwarya were allegedly shot to death by Crown Prince Dipendra. Other six family members were shot too. In the end, the prince shot himself too.…

    • 4993 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics