Human cloning involves many social, moral, and ethical controversies. I would like to state my position: no to human cloning, we have made enough mistakes, and I am personally not ready for such trials of my humanity. Human cloning is perverse, abnormal, unhealthy and unnecessary. It is an unjustifiable waste of human and material resources. I’m glad that the scientists have failed because the less attractive the idea may be to those who want to keep attempting such a thing. Human cloning is a controversial issue that is becoming one of the debatable subjects. I have studied websites to find out what people think of a designer human being. The opinions are divided. Some people are for human cloning as an emotional compensation for our lives' naturally ending in deaths; others are horrified with this unhealthy idea. Why would you want a replicate of someone that might possibly hate you? For example if you mother or father passes away, would you want to replace them with a copy that won’t have the exact feelings he or she felt towards you? Why would you want to replace a loved one in the first place? The idea of death shouldn’t be negative, it’s a way to put the mind and body to rest and at one point we all have to do it. I believe the cloning humans is morally incorrect and in the eyes of religious zealots they’ll will argue that God created man in his own image, and that he is the creator of it all. So why would man challenge God in creating something when he shouldn’t have the ability to do so>
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Kass mentions his four different objections of why cloning should not be performed and the reason they should completely stop researching and experimenting. On the first premises he mentions that it’s an unethical experimentation on the unborn. His reason behind this statement is that it is unethical and too risky to perform such experiment on the unborn child. Mr. Kass mentions that less than 2-3% of cloning attempts succeeded. Moreover, many of the cloned animals that did survive were born with deformities like cows with heart and lung problems and animals not reaching their normal developmental milestone. It is without much doubt that cloning humans would begin on a trial in error. A scientist discovered that a nucleus of an unaltered egg is formed and arranged through months or years as in an altered egg it must reprogram within minutes or hours. Thus, this is why there is a high chance of developmental defects. Mr. Leon E. Kass doesn’t believe in this type of research and believes strictly that cloning should not be permitted because of its unethical experimentation to the unborn child. His second premises, he makes it clear that it threatens identity and Individuality. The reasons behind this statement are that clones, as he mentions, would experience concerns about their own self and appearance; being identical to another person whose genotype is the same. Moreover, He mentions about issues with mixing parents with twin relation and the issues of having too…
- 1985 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…
- 1194 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The general consensus of human cloning is generally faced with disgust. The public opinion of cloning is generally unpopular and is not faced favorably. Because of the unpopular opinion of cloning, there is not much pressure from opposition to allow cloning. It is believed that once science evolved to the point where scientists could successfully engineer an offspring that was perfect and designed by a “parent”, the public opinion of cloning might change. With the public opinion of cloning changed, it may spell certain disaster for the human race. Kass believes this is a possibility because of the mindset of society today. With the instant gratification attitude of society, people are more apt to custom design a child rather that conceiving a child “the old fashioned way”. Kass sees that this…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
"Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The style Lewis Thomas uses is very unique. He writes in a very conversational tone, making it easier for readers to read and relate. He also adds in rhetorical questions as well as short simple sentences in his writing structure, and the entire passage seems to flow eloquently. Lewis Thomas has a distinct voice that is unique only to himself.…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I think cloning is bad because if we genetically alter clones and develop people to be perfect beings then there will not be diversity and there will be problems because people will be choosing selected genes to make the perfect child. Everyone will have the same bodies and diseases will kill a lot of humans because they are all the same. Cloning is also a big moral issue because the concept of making people could interfere or disrupt people’s beliefs and religions.…
- 432 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
"Human Cloning & Bioethics - Reason Why People Object?." HubPages. HubPages, 16 06 2011. Web. 2 Feb 2013. .…
- 1833 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The concept of reproductive cloning has many opponents. Opposition comes from governments, religious organizations, citizen advocacy groups and many private individuals. Almost everyone has an opinion regarding cloning. Entire nations have banned reproductive cloning because of the potential for widespread abuse by unscrupulous parties. Many people feel that cloned individuals could be at risk for abuse even through forced servitude. Conceivably, this could even take the form of cloned individuals being trained as ruthless killing machines. Another aspect of reproductive cloning that is equally frightening to some may be the genetic alteration of babies that could cause an imbalance in the natural process. Cloning and all of its research are widely controversial. Many, if not all, social systems are affected. Controversy even surrounds determining what is and what is not…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
With so many enhancements in medical science, cloning is slowly but surely looking like it could be in the near future. However, is it really an option that should be considered as a way to extend human life? There are a number of negatives involved with reproductive cloning. According to udemy.com, “95% of animal cloning has ended in failure due to genetic defects, and cloning is considered unsafe because of it” (Quinonez). Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus written by Mary Shelley goes along very well with the statement that science can go too far. In the book Victor Frankenstein created a monster that he later regretted creating him. Many believe that cloning is against God’s wishes because the clones would be created by man. Man would be playing God and create people that are unable to feel and empathize. There is also the belief that these clones would be created without a soul. Whatever peoples view on cloning…
- 936 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The negative points of cloning greatly outweigh the positive. This is proved by the fact that cloning is currently illegal in Australia, so other people must feel the same way.…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of "Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?" John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.…
- 1857 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Also, critics of cloning state that scientifically "manufacturing" a child will be like playing the role of god and that cloning undermines the basic elements of a loving and nurturing family and also as accepting each child as an unique individual. In addition, another proposed problem with cloning is that it could be manipulated and used to create an army of people for causing destruction or for slavery. E.V. Kontorovich, a professor of molecular biology from New York, writes, "Cloning would take the humanity out of human reproduction, and in doing so rob our spirits of something that cannot be replaced artificially" (99). He contends cloning is inhumane and there are no good reasons why it should be performed on humans. The proposed medical cloning uses for cloning are in fact unethical as they include the harvesting of organs from clones human fetuses. Although he believes cloning as a means of overcoming infertility is little better, he writes, "The relationship between the parent and his or her cloned child would be very ambiguous, and the clone might be viewed as a commodity that was made rather than a person who was born"…
- 416 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of cloning can have both a positive and negative way of appealing ideas to people. To understand the purpose of cloning one must know the exact meaning. Merriam-Webster defines cloning as "making a copy of", as in making a copy of a human being. The negative aspect of human cloning consists of universal fear, repulsion, and ethical rejection by a variety of religious, political, and philosophical perspectives that would not normally find themselves in agreement. Hatred toward anything associated with replicating human's branches off from the belief that by intervening in traditional reproductive processes, science is entering into the inappropriate territory of creating life. David Rorvik states, "This might be bad. Mankind, in my view, was already and increasingly beset by a sense of rootlessness and unreality To some weary time-travelers, cloning might be a heavy blow, heralding the irreversible approach- if not the actual realization-of the synthesized, plasticized, carbon-copied Man"(Rorvik 26-27). Ian Wilmut, a genetic scientologist who cloned the first mammal in 1996 which was a sheep feels that human cloning is inhumane by saying, "As I will discuss, there are no proposed reasons for copying a person that I find ethically acceptable"(Wilmut 33). The positive outlook on human…
- 1208 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays