Preview

Speech of Archidamus (1.80-1.85)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Speech of Archidamus (1.80-1.85)
Teacher: Eleni Panagiotarakou
Wednesday, July 16th, 2014

Speech of Archidamus (1.80-1.85)

The book “On justice, power and human nature” by the athenian general, philosopher and general known as Thucydides, examines the history of the Peloponnesian war as well as exploring the actions of the political government. His analysis carries various speeches from important figures that were present during the war. In the speech of Archidamus, Thucydides expresses what the king conveyed to the attendees in the congress of Sparta. This essay will argue how the speech of Archidamus expresses that being unprepared and to charge against the high resourceful Athenian population would be unwise, harmful and dangerous. His decision for expressing these words is mainly based on historical facts. King Archidamus claims that if their unprepared population decides to ignore these facts, it will bring a greater harm to their population. In contrast, their foe, the Athenians have access to a variety of essential resources such as, “a strong navy and their numerous tax-paying allies allows them to achieve a higher chance of victory at war.” (1.80). Therefrom, due to these important facts, the wise king Archidamus strongly encourages their population to postpone their attack and to prepare their army instead. In preparation for their postponed war, the Spartans must gather new allies and new resources. By doing so, they will establish a “better position in countering their Athenians foes.”(1.82). Moreover, King Archidamus argues that to abstain their attack and act cautious is not an act of cowardice, but an act of bravery. He agrees that they’re indeed slow, but their action is nothing but self control. He says “This slowness of ours is really nothing but a clear headed self control.” (1.84). This expressive statement from the wise king means that by taking their time is not because they’re cowards, rather they’re controlling themselves from making an irrational action due



Bibliography: Thucydides, On Justice, Power & Human Nature. Translated by Paul Woodruff (Hackett Publishing Company, 1993). ISBN 0-87220-168-6, paperback.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there was one thing Sparta wanted out of the Peloponnesian War, it was to bring down Athens. Given Athens' rising strength and its ability to acquire an ever-larger navy of vessels from contributions paid by its dependents and allies, Sparta appeared to be concerned (Cartwright, 2018). As a matter of fact, Athens was becoming stronger and winning more and more wars thanks to its allies. Furthermore, Sparta believed that if nothing was done, Corinth, another major Greek state, was going to be forced to go along with Athens (Cartwright, 2018). When discussing ancient Greece, we frequently concentrate on Athens and Sparta, two of the principal towns.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you imagine four-thousand spartans charging down a hill while three-thousand Athenians ready their bows and release them all simultaneously while the string whips in the hard rain? The Peloponnesian War was one of the most fierce wars in Greece because many people fell in battle. From the South were the Spartans. Their forces had never been stronger with a reformed, military-based government. From the North was the Athenians who had just been through a war that had been won, and were still armed and battle ready, holding fortresses across Greece. The interactions that these two city states made against, with, and without them were so intense that even the fierce kings, Leonidas of Sparta and King Pericles Cleon Nicias of Athens, fell to each other's armies.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Stoic is a person who is seemingly indifferent to or unaffected by joy, grief, pleasure, or pain. One who is not touched by the outside world seem to live inside themselves always thinking that today might be the last. Stoics detach themselves from things of this worlds including objects, people, and to a certain extent their own lives. In Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations and Epictetus’ Discourses they both explain how to properly be a stoic, learning to deny their feelings, respect themselves and nature, and detach themselves from the useless things of this world.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    They also fell noticeably short of their own military ambitions and perceptions. They boasted that they were more than strong enough to hold their own and that their “diplomacy” of promising freedom for those who submitted to their rule could win over any hostile outsiders. Yet, in their attempted “negotiations” with the Melians, the Athenians essentially admitted they could not accept neutrality because they were afraid of looking weak in the eyes of their subjects. In a sense, the Athenians admitted their shortcomings right to their enemies’ faces. A stable empire with a truly strong military would not possess such a fear, at least not to the extent that its policies would revolve around that fear. Furthermore, the Melians pointed out that the Athenians’ rationale and strategy were fairly absurd: they should instead allow the Melians and others to remain neutral. By being aggressive conquerors, the Athenians will only create more bitterness, anger, and resentment among their subjects, and thus invite more hostility from their subjects and outsiders. The Athenians, letting their pride come first, rejected this argument and refused to consider the possibility of a friendly yet neutral…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Peloponnesian War was the turning point in Athenian hegemony in Ancient Greece. It was fought in 431 B.C. between the Delian League, led by Athens, and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. According to Thucydides, Athens’ imposing hegemonic status and its overwhelming quest for more power made the Peloponnesian War and Athens’s eventual fall from power inevitable. Despite the Athenians having a far more superior navy and being considerably wealthier, they were defeated and made subjects of Sparta. In this paper, I will discuss Thucydides’ and Socrates’ reasons for why Athens lost the war and then I will present my own theory.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Men who are capable of real action first make their plans and then go forward without hesitation while their enemies have still not made up their minds.” ― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War. If there was ever a more accurate quote to describe Alcibiades, this out shone it. Through his manipulation, impressive persuasion, and eagerness to be on the winning side, Alcibiades, son of Cleinias, was able to become a prominent figure in the Peloponnesian war.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our first speaker praised our wondrous military. I will be continuing my team's argument that Athens is far superior to Sparta by examining the mindset of the Athenian government. To prove/support my belief that the Athenian government was superior to that of Sparta, I will be arguing 2 major points. Firstly, that the government in Athens was fairer than theirs and secondly, that the system of governing was stronger than theirs.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Athens’ quest for a great empire, they planned to dominate their lesser foes, add to their empire, and show their strength; these pursuits brought them to the city of Melos. Melos was a small island in the Aegean Sea and a colony of Sparta, but they where a neutral state; they were not allied with either side. They had not been involved in the Peloponnesian war as of yet, and did not plan on getting involved. Then, Athens came, demanding surrender and tribute, but Melos chose to resist, rather than submit. Athens believed that because they had might on their side, that they also had the right to conquer weaker city-states (“The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”).…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides, a known historian during the time, described and analyzed the motives of the infamous Peloponnesian War. The war was between two powerful city-states: Athens and Sparta. The conflict arose due to excessive power. The Athenians were optimistic that they were the driving force that led Greece and all of its city-states. Specifically, the historian focuses on the funeral oration presented by Pericles. Pericles, ironically, doesn’t display sorrow but displays comfort and proud of what each individual has contributed to Athens. For Pericles, it wasn’t about the tragic fatalities but about courage and patriotism. Pericles believes in Athens and knows that this city-state possesses many freedoms and opportunities for success and peace.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcibiades's Downfall

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Nine Greek Lives: The Rise and Fall of Athens, Plutarch presents the life of Alcibiades as a contrast between inspired military excellence and disappointing moral failure. Although he was a brilliant and accomplished military strategist, Alcibiades’ lack of moral fortitude, and his provocation of the Athenians into reckless action led to his downfall, and that of Athens. Although Alcibiades was a man of prodigious gifts who could have led Athens to military dominance, he gave in to base self-interest and lack of self-control that caused him to alienate his friends, waste his military genius, and die alone in exile.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens War Research Paper

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Athens had certain compulsions and priorities that affected them. Athens placed great value on fear, honor, and profit. Emotions can be used as an offensive or defensive weapon. These emotions can be used to heighten the importance of your priorities and can affect the way they go about collecting information. The information then gathered will directly impact the way we form our beliefs and the need to act. Thucydides believes that fear by the Spartans played an important part in causing the war. Sparta felt threaten by the change in the power balance from Athens due to their imperialistic expansion. Fear can change over to terror, which is a more personal form and can change the way people and states think. Effective leaders can combat the fear and terror found in war and conflict. There are five major ways they can do this. (Petersen 321) The leader can use rational discourse. They will focus on the threat but are not influenced by the emotions and to focus on concrete actions. The leader can use hope as a way to help combat the fear and terror. This is the opposite and is based on a positive future and outcomes. Hope and fear cannot exist, but hope is a distortion in a positive manner. The leader can use the threat of shame by taking a single action attached to the person’s identity. This is different from guilting the person due to it being more personal and guilt can be forgiven. The use of anger can also be used. They would need to believe that a bad action has been committed against them and the focusing on the need for punishment. A final way to counter the use of fear and terror is by the use of spite. This is different than anger because of the belief that the enemy is going to receive some good that they do not deserve. They will then fight to prevent and to stop the enemy from their undeserved good. In ancient Greece and seen in Thucydides writing fear…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An account of the Athenian Mitylenian Debate from Thuycidides’s History of the Peloponessian War illustrates how the democratic process impedes decision-making in…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics