Preview

Speeches

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Speeches
CONSTITUTION & BY-LAWS AMENDMENT RESOLUTION

SUBJECT OF RESOLUTION: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROHIBITION OF NON-CHRISTIAN WITH ISLAMIC IDENTITY TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE NOR LIVE IN ANY OF THE RESIDENCES WITHIN FLORAVILLE 4 SUBDIVISION, BRGY LUINAB, ILIGAN CITY

SUBMITTED TO: GRIEVANCE AND ADJUDICATION COMMITTEE

SUBMITTED BY: DANILO R. CHAVES

INTENT OF RESOLUTION: DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT TO PROHIBIT ANY NON-CHRISTIAN WITH ISLAMIC IDENTITY TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE NOR LIVE IN ANY OF THE RESIDENCES WITHIN FLORAVILLE 4 SUBDIVISION, BRGY LUINAB, ILIGAN CITY

WHEREAS, the difference in religion between Christians and Muslims can bring a rise of different conflicts which results to chaos and disorder within the community. Moreover, Muslims and Christians have different understandings of worship making some Muslim religious customs a nuisance to some Christians or vice versa. Take for example the following situations:
a) if we wanted to have a Christmas party where we can enjoy, if there are Muslim residents we tend to be more careful not to disturb them since they don’t celebrate Christmas at all.
b) if we wanted to eat or even grill pork, we tend to be more tedious making sure that they will not be offended by it.
WHEREAS, Muslim residents with disagreement with other Muslim clans tend to have rido which is characterized by sporadic outbursts of retaliatory violence between families and kinship groups, as well as between communities. It is considered one of the major problems in Mindanao because apart from numerous casualties, rido has caused destruction of property, crippled the local economy, and displaced families.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution and By-Laws be amended by re-numbering the current wording Section 1.2 to “1.2 (a)” and by adding a new paragraph (b) Section 1.2 to read as follows:
(b) Furthermore, the Constitution and By Laws already bar Non-Christian with Islamic identity to be able to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The issue at hand in this case is whether or not the town ordinance is constitutional. To determine this, there are a number of questions that must be asked and laws that must be examined.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appellants argued the decision to approve the resort construction violated their freedom of religion right protected by s. 2(a). Building the resort would drive out the Grizzly Bear Spirit, a spirit central to their beliefs and practices. They argued the Big M Drug Mart definition of the 2(a) right included the belief that freedom of religion had a communal aspect that the state could not…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. City of Boerne v. Flores: dispute arose when Catholic Archbishop of San Antonio, Patrick Flores, applied for a building permit to enlarge his 1923 mission-style St. Peter’s Church in Boerne, Texas. The building was located in a historic district and considered a contributing property (). Local zoning authorizes denied the permit, citing an ordinance governing additions and new construction in a historic district. The Archbishop brought suit, challenging the ruling under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). Flores argued that his congregation had outgrown the existing structure, rendering the ruling a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion without a compelling state interest.…

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 116 provides four guarantees in relation to religion – three of which are influenced by the First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution. However, only two of the four guarantees have been subjected to interpretation by the High Court , they being: (a) The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion; and (b) The Commonwealth shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion. KEY HCA CASES SINCE…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People from other religions fighting eachother for that they don’t share the same point of view. For example, the crusades. Crusades were a series of religious expeditionary wars blessed by the pope. The catholic church wanted to restore access to Jerusalem for the Christian. Thousands of Christians, Muslims and Jews died in these wars just because they had not got the same religion.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Denial of the permit to expand the church resulted from the need to conserve the historic district. However, Flores saw this as violation of the religious freedom restoration act thus filling a suit. Filling a suit entailed that the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quebec Charter of Values

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The topic of this essay concerns the current proposed law in Quebec regarding the ban on people wearing and displaying religious symbols in government, publicly funded institutions and places of work by the people employed at said places. The Provence of Quebec, governed at this time by the Parti Quebecois, has put forth Bill 60, named the Quebec Charter of Values. Essentially Bill 60 will restrict the wearing or displaying of all religious symbols by people who are attending school or working in the public sector. For example, if a Muslim nurse wearing a hijab was employed at a hospital in the province, she would be required to take off her hijab and any other visible religious symbols before she entered the hospital to start her shift. The bill would apply to judges, police, prosecutors, public daycare workers, teachers, school employees, hospital workers and municipal personnel. The government of Quebec states that; “The purpose of this bill is to establish a Charter affirming the values of State secularism and religious neutrality and of equality between women and men, and providing a framework for…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Van Orden v. Perry

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case raised issue on whether placing a religious monument on state property violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Lemon Test, established in precedent Lemon V. Kurtzman, concluded that to survive an Establishment Clause challenge a policy 1) must have a secular purpose; 2) must have a principal or primary effect that doesn’t advance or inhibit religion; and 3) must not foster excessive government entanglement with religion” (Blazing).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The clergymen’s letter suggests that the racial problem in Birmingham, Alabama, needs to be resolved in court peacefully. The exigency of his argument is to try to solve the racial issue with an innovative and constructive approach. The letter was written to the editor of a Birmingham’s newspaper. Based on that, the audience of this letter was the newspaper’s readers, all the city’s citizens. The fact that the writer of this letter is a religious person, and he also represents a group of religious, the constraints are the following: based on his religious beliefs and background, he is opposed to the usage of violence in order to resolve the community’s…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum/130 Appendix B

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I know some people that are Muslim and they do not eat pork because of their religion.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the legal issues involved here? Which of the measures proposed by Abigail are legal, and which are not? Explain the legal issues involved and reference specific pages from your readings to support your conclusions.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    M-103 is a significant attempt at addressing Islamophobia and decreasing the crime and abuse caused by it. “While the Muslim population grows, acceptance has wavered. A 2013 poll found that more than half (54 per cent) of Canadians viewed Islam ‘unfavourably.’ A 2016 poll also found that 54 per cent of Canadians held an unfavourable opinion of Muslims. Hate crimes against Muslim-Canadians more than doubled over a three-year span, statistics revealed last year.” (Kohut, 2017) Surprisingly, the total number of hate crimes are decreasing but the number of hate crimes against Muslims appears to be increasing continuously. The biggest misconception that leads to hate is that Islam promotes terrorism. The media plays a big role in projecting Muslims as a promoter of terrorism, which leads to intimidation of the whole group. Shortly after the passing of M-103, a Facebook group containing over fourty thousand members known as La Meute planned to protest the motion because they do not support Islam and believe that M-103 is an unacceptable favour for Muslims. However, M-103 will not affect them in any way as it is not a law. Conducting a study on rising Islamophobia may help solve misconceptions about Muslims and m-103 and will indicate that discrimination is intolerable and not welcome in Canada. M-103 states that “The latter would require the heritage committee to collect data on hate crime…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Canadian Charter Freedoms

    • 2125 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Without intention or realization these policies sometimes infringe ones’ right to practice freedom of religion and can be brought in front of a court to be challenged. In the case of Amselem v. Syndicat Northerest there was an between the Jewish residents being allowed to put Succahs on their balconies of a jointly owned apartment building and the other partial owners of the building. The Orthodox Jews said that this was breaching their right to freely practice their religion because each person needed an individual Succot to live in for 9 days during a specific Jewish holiday and the Northcrest crew would not allow them on their balconies. Northcrest argued that it went against the by-laws, that structures were not permitted to be built on the balconies and they stated that it downgraded the building value and the attractiveness of the property. In their case the Supreme Court of Canada looked at the perspective of both Syndicat Northcrest and the Jewish residents to determine whether the case made of violating the right to freedom was actually violated. The courts did determine that the rights of the Jewish residents had been broken and that the freedom of religion would prevail because even though it was policy signed in the contract of the building it did not have a significant impact on the Northcrest people (CanLII, 2002). This shows that even in private…

    • 2125 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    and Answers, Map of the RFRA). Employment Division v. Smith was a court case in…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Anonymous. (2007). Education and enlightenment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 97(3), 3-26,288-290. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/‌pqdweb?did=1468247921&Fmt=3&clientId=74379&RQT=309&VName=PQD…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays