Spr 316 Final Report

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES STRENGTHENED WITH FRP LAMINATES
Final Report SPR 316

Oregon Department of Transportation

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES STRENGTHENED WITH FRP LAMINATES Final Report SPR 316

by Damian Kachlakev, PhD Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 and Thomas Miller, PhD, PE; Solomon Yim, PhD, PE; Kasidit Chansawat; Tanarat Potisuk Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 for Oregon Department of Transportation Research Group 200 Hawthorne SE, Suite B-240 Salem, OR 97301-5192 and Federal Highway
58 Figure 3.29: Crack patterns at failure: (a) Control Beam; (b) Flexure Beam.............................................................. 60 Figure 3.30: Crack patterns at failure: (a) Shear Beam; (b) Flexure/Shear Beam....................................................... 61 Figure 3.31: Locations of maximum stresses in FRP composites: (a) Flexure Beam; (b) Shear Beam ...................... 62 Figure 3.31 (continued): Locations of maximum stresses in FRP composites: (c) Flexure/Shear Beam.................... 63 Figure 4.1: Locations of truck on the Horsetail Creek Bridge .................................................................................... 66 Figure 4.1 (continued): Locations of truck on the Horsetail Creek Bridge ................................................................. 67 Figure 4.2: Locations of the monitored beams on the Horsetail Creek Bridge ........................................................... 68 Figure 4.3: Truck load simplification: (a) and (b) show configurations of the dump truck and the