It is nothing but human to want more. This essential quality is what makes people human. By striving to be better, this species has done countless extraordinary things by wanting to elevate ourselves higher than others. However, Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” shows the story of young, beautiful, 19th century housewife Mathilde Loisel aspiring to be a luxurious white collar. Even though it is human nature to want more, Mathilde ravening desire to appear as higher class blinds her of what she has and becomes her own downfall.…
On the other hand there is Madame Loisel, which is a character that just feels that it is her duty to be what the society expects of all women. She feels that she has to be in the high class, that she is worth a lot and that all because of her beauty should adore her. She also had an opinion that if she wants something she has to get it or it is the end of the world. In addition, her believe is that her just deserve, also for whom she is, expensive cloths, and expensive necklace.…
Both Mathilde and Mrs. Mallard have fantasies and thoughts which may appear selfish and self-involved. However, while Mathilde Loisel is a discontent woman who fantasizes about being a rich classy woman, Mrs. Mallard's envisions in her thoughts how happy her life would become as a result of not belonging to a marriage anymore. As such, on one hand, there is Mathilde, who dreams of "large silent anterooms, expensive silks and of achievement and fame that would make her the envy of all other women". And, then, there is Mrs. Mallard, whose dreams were full of pictures of the coming spring and summer days that would "be her own". While Mathilde fails to realize is that her daydreams only make her more…
Moss, Joyce and George Wilson. “Overview: ‘The Necklace’.” Literature and Its Times: Profiles of 300 Notable Literary Works and the Historical Events that Influenced Them. Vol. 2: Civil Wars to Frontier Societies (1800-1880s). Joyce Moss’ “Overview: ‘The Necklace’” is a brief article and it tells the story of the Parisian life in the 1800s. The article describes the life of the society and the limitation on women’s lives during the time “The Necklace” by de Maupassant was written. Moss’ article analyzes de Maupassant’s views of women and their place in society at that time. Most importantly, Moss emphasized on how Parisian society treated and bordered women from men - not giving women rights nor acknowledging them. According to Moss, in the 1800s “men recognize only one right in women: the right to please.” This statement shows Moss’s views on how men viewed women as property, lower-situated than themselves and unequal members of the Parisian society at that time. The key concept of the article is the connection between women and their social status; this is being accomplished by bringing the importance of jewelry in women’s life; jewelry as a symbol and sign of social and financial status. Women in that era sought jewelry as a way to classify their status to the public. The reader is told that women followed a certain trend, which in other terms meant finding a husband who was wealthy. Moss writes: “jewels were a widespread symbol...by a diamond necklace.” By this, Moss explains that bourgeois status was upheld if a woman owned a diamond necklace. Even though women were devalued in this era, a social status amongst society and other families of wealth could be reached once the woman found a man to provide for her and buy her expensive clothing and jewelry which could be afforded only by the wealthy; thus – securing a certain social status for…
Maupassant conveys the importance of marriage during this time frame when he includes in “The Jewelry” that Mrs. Lantin’s mother visited bourgeois families in hopes of marrying her daughter off (Booth69). The public’s view on matrimony took a toll on the independent lives and decisions of women. A woman’s image at this time was important; it reflected who they were, as well as where they came from. Expectations for women to fulfill their duties as a homemaker left little room to deviate from the social normality.…
In Guy de Maupassant's, "The Necklace", Madame Loisel's ungrateful, materialistic, and jealous behavior completely shapes her entire life. Her admiration of the glitz and glam of the rich led to her greatest downfall. Because of her desires she is unable to appreciate the life she had and unable to live the full life of a woman which she had always desired…
Maupassant shows greediness in a variety of ways. Mathilde thinks very highly of herself and has a vain complex. She thinks so much of herself that she feels almost every dime they have should be spent on her for just one evening. Shortly after…
Guy de Maupassant in the short story, “The Necklace”, demonstrates that if one is unsatisfied with their life, they will ask for more and make sure they are not unsatisfied with what they have. Maupassant supports his message by using characterization of Monsieur Loisel when she was grieving for more in her middle-class life. An example of Monsieur Loisel characterization is “She grieved incessantly, feeling that she had been born for all the little niceties and luxuries of living” (28). This story had taken place in Paris during the 19th century. In this example, the author uses characterization to show how Monsieur Loisel is comparing her dull life to a bright high class life which she wants. The main character, Monsieur Loisel, is wanting…
Mathilde Loisel is middle class woman and has a kind husband. However, she is cooped up in the house all day with nothing to do, and her days are marked with boredom beyond belief. Her only way out of dealing with it is to live in a fantasy world of glamour, wealth, and beautiful people.…
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…
Ms. Loisel is very selfish throughout the story. She shows her selfishness when she wants to be rich and to live in a nice house. She also shows her selfishness when she wants to wear expensive clothing and jewelry to the party. Ms. Loisel is very selfish because she wants these things only for herself. Ms. Loisel is not a poor woman, she is a middle class, she has the basic necessities for her to live a good life, but she wants more than just that. Everything she wants is the wealth and good social status that she does not and cannot have. She feels depressed every time she thinks about wealth or visits Ms. Forrestier, her “rich friend, a comrade from convent days, whom she did not want to see anymore because she suffered so much when she returned home.”…
Born a commoner, Mathilde Loisel had always dreamt of a life in the high society. As it was, she never seemed to be able to reach that plateau. Money has always had the power to separate every day people into classes. A person will be considered higher in class if he has more money than someone else, even if the other person had worked hard for what little he did have and the upper class man had inherited it; it makes no difference. In Mme. Loisel's case, she was born poor and lived poor, but she always had a mindset of being something more. She was not ambitious but rather wishful. As many in society today, she thought she was owed more than what she was handed in life but was not quite willing to put effort into it, and the best things in life are the things that take effort and sacrifice. Mme. Loisel was not willing to strive for the superior life she dreamed of.…
Mathilde Loisel is the main character. She is beautiful and in her early twenties. She has a stable life with a roof over her head, food, and a loving husband. However, she yearns for much more. Mathilde states, “I’m utterly miserable because I have no jewels to wear, not a single stone.” After her husband had already given her all of his savings, she still complained because she did not have everything she wanted. She was oblivious to the sacrifice he was making. The passage states, “She suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury.” The statement emphasizes that she thinks that she deserves to have everything her heart desires. Mathilde can be called a material girl because she values fancy material things more than anything else. She wants to feel glamorous and beautiful, unlike her shabby life. She treats her husband like a butler, and expects him to provide her with things that he simply cannot afford. She thinks that anyone below her should supply her every whim. The story states, “He was heart broken.” Her husband had tried so hard to receive an invitation to the party for her, but when he did, all she did was complain. He…
At first, Moupassant has Mme. Loisel always feeling bad for herself for not being married into a better, more highly regarded family. The husband is shown to be a good man, always trying to please his wife, but to no avail. This becomes clear when the husband comes home one evening with an invitation to a very select event that he thinks will make her happy. Instead, Mme. Loisel is unappreciative and frets about how she has nothing proper to wear to such a thing. Again and again the author shows us the husband’s love and sacrifice for his wife, who is never fully satisfied.…
The decision of a man, in the 19th century, to maintain a woman of the correct attire was to signify his wealth, class, and sexual power, showing his ability to attain not just the care of himself but also the care of a helpless woman. The women who visualised and obtained the least practical use being the most desirable, this revealed a society that determined the female identity’s only use to be a visual object of desire, for male satisfaction to then be a visual representation of their social status. For women to gain moral respect in society they had to compete in the admiration of men by being perceived as not just beautiful but well disciplined in dress. “Tight lacing was associated in the popular mind of virtue” (ibid) This reiterating the strong influence fashion had for women to uphold their position in society, the male opinion on their appearance and dress determining their position. 145…