Preview

X

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
X
BOURQUE v DUPLECHIN

1. facts

(1) Bourque was playing second base on soft ball (2) After Bourque had thrown the ball to first base, Duplechin ran at full speed into Bourque (3) As Duplechin ran into Bourque, he brought his left arm up under Bourque's chin

2. procedural history

Plaintiff, Jerome Bourque, Jr., filed this suit to recover damages for personal injuries received in a softball game. Made defendants were Adrien Duplechin, a member of the opposing team who inflicted the injuries, and Duplechin's liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company.

3. issue

Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game; and in failing to find that Bourque was guilty of contributory negligence. Defendant Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in finding him negligent and in finding that the injury to plaintiff Bourque occurred four to five feet away from the second base position in the general direction of the pitcher's mound. Allstate further contends that the trial court erred in finding coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured. 4. holding

supports the trial court's conclusion that Bourque did not assume the risk of Duplechin's negligent act.

5. rationale

There is no question that defendant Duplechin's conduct was the cause in fact of the harm to plaintiff Bourque. Duplechin was under a duty to play softball in the ordinary fashion without unsportsmanlike conduct or wanton injury to his fellow players. This duty was breached by Duplechin, whose behavior was, according to the evidence, substandard and negligent. Bourque may also have assumed the risk of an injury resulting from standing in the base path and being spiked by someone sliding into second base, a common

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contributory Negligence Summary in Culpepper v. Weihrauch KG, ETC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, M.D. ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike, which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court had granted that request. This request was granted due to a liability contract that cleared the defendant of negligence and gross negligence.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jane Chambers, filed a personal injury action alleging negligence by the defendant, Giorgio's Grill. She alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet napkin, breaking her leg. The defendant denied any negligence.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    14. As a further result of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, there is a reasonable probability that Plaintiff will require further medical care and attention and will incur future reasonable and necessary expenses for medical care and attention. Plaintiff’s doctors estimated over $100,000 in future medical bills, plastic surgery, and counseling to be incurred by Plaintiff.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scarlet Rose Case Summary

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Scarlet Rose her claim for damages done to her and bills brought up for damages that occur to her because of her slip and fall accident at the Nickel & Dime store on January 31, 2001. Ms. Rose wants compensation for the accident at Nickel & Dime and her medical bills paid. Ms. Rose entered Nickel & Dime and as she was walking and she slipped over a box in the middle of the isle that an employee had placed there. Ms. Rose says that she did not see the box as a rack was blocking her view. She was in a little hurry, but not distracted.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The appeal concerns a collision between the appellant, who played for the Tiger-Cats and the complainant, who played for the Pirates. In the final 47 seconds of the game the collision occurred resulting in the complainant suffering several injuries including debilitating headaches.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis: Samantha is not able to prove that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous substance on the floor; therefore, the grocery store was not negligent in its duty to the customer and cannot be held liable for Samantha’s injuries.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lowe Case Study

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plaintiff John Lowe attended a Quakes’ home game in California and his seat was along the left field foul line. During the game, the team mascot was playing his antics behind plaintiff and had been touching plaintiff with his tail. Plaintiff was therefore distracted and turned around toward the mascot. After that, plaintiff returned his focus on the game but got hit by a foul ball. Plaintiff heavily injured because of the foul ball and then brought a suit against the defendant California baseball league. The trail court granted the defendant summary judgement. Plaintiff then appealed the decision.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shenendehowa Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this case, the plaintiff, McGrath, states that the defendant, Shenendehowa Central School District, did not maintain a safe playing field and showed negligence when it came to field maintenance. The plaintiff also claimed that before the injury occurred she observed the spots on the field that were repaired and she couldn’t tell them different from regular rough patches of dirt on the field that were covered by grass. So basically she is claiming that she was unaware of the hazardous spots filled with soft, sand-like material and was unaware of the actual risk she was taking because she was only able to observe the surface of the field. She states that when she planted her foot, it “sunk” into the ground and as she continued to perform the move her foot remained stuck in the so-called sinkhole and that is why…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She arrived to her verdict illegally, no evidence was presented about whether players in the league play the same positions throughout the whole game. Furthermore, the judge disregarded the fact that the appellant’s team was losing by two goals, and the game was almost over Additionally Mr. Shorey, testified that the team was planning on pulling the goalie to add another skater, which proposes that the team was attempting to win the game, and score…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Due to this collision, Bradshaw suffered serious injuries including a cervical fracture which caused quadriplegic paralysis. The plaintiffs alleged that Rawlings was negligent in operating his vehicle and that Delaware Valley College was guilty of negligence as it failed to supervise students at the class picnic.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen assignment draft

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages

    rectify substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another”, Ill. Sup. Ct. R.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight by a preponderance of evidence, not that the defendant was solely responsible for the unfortunate and untimely death of Jordan Simon, but that those representing Roughed Grouse High School were more negligent above all others involved.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    X

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1. Evidence of evolution suggests that the mechanisms of inheritance, accompanied by selection, allow change over many generations…

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, Bao's turn again, he gained another point by taking advantage of his height and smashing successfully 3-5.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics