ACERA Project
2006 Round 1, Project 09
Title
Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication
Author(s) / Address (es)
Jane Gilmour and Ruth Beilin, University of Melbourne
Material Type and Status (Internal draft, Final Technical or Project report, Manuscript, Manual,
Software)
Project final report
Summary
The aim of the report was to review and evaluate methods for stakeholder mapping. The report intended to explore applications in biosecurity risk management, and to recommend potentially fruitful direction for testing methods that might improve the efficiency of stakeholder interactions.
The report reviews a range of options and outlines in detail the definition and identification of stakeholders, and procedures for mapping influence and interest. It uses a workshop run by ACERA on volume of trade to illustrate the basic features of these methods. The report concludes by discussing the merits and weaknesses of the mapping approaches. It recommends their use to improve the efficiency of interactions and to improve transparency of process.
ACERA Use only
ACERA Use only
ACERA Use only
Received By:
ACERA / AMSI SAC Approval:
ACERA / AMSI SAC Approval:
Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis
Date:
Date:
Date:
Page 1 of 55
Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication; ACERA Project 06/09
Dr Jane Gilmour; ACERA
Associate Professor Ruth Beilin, University of Melbourne
Review; April 2007
Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis
Page 2 of 55
Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication
Acknowledgements
This report is a product of the Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis (ACERA). In preparing this report, the authors acknowledge the financial and other support provided by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), the University of Melbourne,
Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute (AMSI) and Australian Research Centre
References: Adam, B., Beck, U. and Van Loon, J. (2000). The risk society and beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, London, Sage Aligica, P. D. (2005). “Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change.” Global Prosperity Initiative, Working Paper # 58, Mercatus Center, George Mason University. www.mercatus.org/publications Allen, G., Suggett, D & Goodsir, B (1999) Althaus, C. E. (2003). "A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk." Risk Analysis 25(3): 567-588. Arnstein, S. (1969). “A ladder of citizen participation.” Journal of American Institute of Planners 35: 216-224 Beck, U., Bonss, Wolfgang and Lau, Christoph (2003). "The theory of reflexive modernization." Theory, Culture and Society Vol 20(2): 1-33. Beierle, T. C. (2002). "The Quality of Stakeholder-based Decision." Risk Analysis 22(4): 739-749. Beierle, T. C. & Cayford, J (2002). Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions Beilin, R., Paine, M., Njoba, J., Pryor, R. (2006). “Reconceptualising extension: a framework for managing complex social, economic and environmental issues in practice.” (unpublished) Biosecurity Australia (2003) Import Risk Analysis Handbook, Commonwealth of Australia www.daffa.gov.au/ba/ira/process-handbook Bocking, Stephen (2004) Nature’s Experts: Science, Politics and the Environment, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Rutgers University Press Brody, S. D. (2003). "Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management." Journal of Planning Education and Brugha, R. & Varvasovsky, Z. (2000) “Stakeholder analysis: A Review.” Health Policy and Planning 15(3):239-246 Bryson, J. M. (2004) “What to do when stakeholders matter: A Guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques.” Public Management Review 6(1): 21-53 Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, John Wiley & Sons. Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Finn, C. B. (2004). Visible Thinking: Unlocking causal mapping for practical business results Burgman, M. (2005). Review of the Western Rock lobster Ecological Risk Assessment, 2005. Report to the Western Australian Fishing Industry Council. Carolan, Michael S. (2006). “Science, Expertise and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process.” Society and Natural Resources 19: 661-668 Carr, Anna J. L. (2004). "Why Do We All Need Community Science?" Society and Natural Resources 17: 841-849. Clarke, J. N. & Cortner, H. J (2002). The State and Nature: Voices Heard, Voices Unheard in America 's Environmental Dialogue Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). "A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance." The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117. Coady, Linda. (1999) “Good Stuff You Mostly Won’t Find on Anybody’s Website.” Unpublished paper delivered as the Doug Little Memorial Lecture, University of Northern British Columbia, cited in Svendsen and Laberge (2005 and 2006) Cosby, B.C Cummings, J. &. Doh, J. P. (2000). "Identifying Who Matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments." California Management Review 42(2): 83-104. Dambacher, J. M., Brewer, D., Dennis, D.M., Macintyre, M. & Foale, S. (2006). “Qualitative modelling of gold mine impacts on Lihir Island 's socio-economic system and reef-edge fish De Lopez, T. T. (2001) "Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia." Environmental Management Vol de Marchi, B. & Ravetz, R.. (1999). "Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach." Futures 31: 743-757. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91 Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond - Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. D.S.E. (2005). Effective Engagement: building relationships with community and other stakeholders. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran (1998) Making Strategy, The Journey of Strategic Management. 62 (5): 541-554 Finucane, Melissa (2000) “Improving Quarantine Risk Communication: Understanding Public Risk Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham, Duke University Press