Preview

Stalin's Achievement of Total Power in the Ussr

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stalin's Achievement of Total Power in the Ussr
Why was Stalin able to achieve total power in the USSR by the end of the 1920’s?
Stalin’s rise to power was due to many different factors. Firstly, on Lenin’s funeral day Stalin had given the wrong date to Trotsky which meant that Trotsky never turned up. Stalin took great advantage of the ‘Lenin Levy’ and how they worshipped Lenin. Stalin had written a short book which had summarised all of Lenin’s ideas and plans. From the side of the new Bolsheviks, this showed Stalin as the ‘true heir’ or natural successor of Lenin which made it increasingly difficult for his opponents to criticise him and his decisions. The absence of Trotsky at Lenin’s funeral created a large amount of political damage for him.
Trotsky also had weaknesses and made a lot of mistakes. For example, Trotsky was the man who had organised the Bolshevik revolution, ran the Red Army and in 1917 was made the Commissar of Foreign Affairs. Although Trotsky was a brilliant man and was feared by many because he controlled the Red Army and was thought to become the dictator, he was extremely unpopular with Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev along with some other members in the Politburo, because he was very arrogant and had never joined the Communist Party until 1917 and as a result many people had doubted his loyalty to the party.
Stalin also had a good place in the Communist party because he was the general secretary, which meant that he could employ and fire communist party members. As general secretary Stalin could organise meetings that were convenient to him. He could also disadvantage his opponents during conferences because he was in charge of preparing the agendas, which questions would be debated over and also between whom and in what order.. Stalin was the one who appointed the nomenklatura, who appointed the apparatchiki. Stalin used this to his advantage because he removed the supporters of Trotsky so that he only had supporters of himself. By 1933, there were 3.5 million new members which were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The personalities of each individual contender played a role in establishing their position and reputation within the Party, which ultimately would strengthen or weaken their chances of becoming leader. Trotsky was a passionate member of the party and had the strongest Revolutionary record amongst all of his opponents. His leadership of the Red Army allowed the communists to seize power in the October Revolution, enhancing his reputation, despite being labeled a traitor when he sided with the Mensheviks in 1903. However, he was noted as ‘arrogant’ in Lenin’s testament and managed to gain many enemies within the party as he felt there was no need to endear himself to his colleagues and he therefore displayed little respect towards them. This made him very unpopular and a tyrant to compromise with as he believed in debate as a way of solving issues and adopted other western ideas, tainting his image. Similarly, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Rykov allowed their unfavorable personalities to ruin their appeal within the party and all were criticised in Lenin’s testament, further diminishing their chances of success. Stalin also…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Stalin’s rule mar the key turning point in Russia’s political development 1856-1953?…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like Hitler, Stalin first became active in politics when he joined a militant political party. The party Stalin joined was known as the Russian Social Democratic Party. Stalin was arrested in 1902 and was deported to Siberia but escaped and was back in Georgia two year later. Stalin first met Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik faction of the Social Democratic Party, when he returned to Georgia. Lenin was a political mentor to Stalin and had great respect for him. In 1912, Lenin nominated Stalin to the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party. However, Stalin was arrested once again and exiled to Siberia in 1917 where he would remain until the Czar was overthrown. After the Bolshevik revolution in 1917, Lenin became the new ruler of Russia and named Stalin the Commissar of Nationalities. Over the years, however, Lenin’s health began to deteriorate. In 1924, Lenin died and the party now known as the All-Union Communist Party was headed collectively by several of Lenin’s cabinet members. Like Hitler, Stalin was a very clever manipulator and was able to turn the members against each other. After successfully obtaining more power, Stalin had the few political enemies he had left shot and he assumed power of the Soviet Union (“Joseph Stalin”,…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How far was Stalin’s victory in the power struggle between 1924 and 1929 the result of the popularity of his policies?…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin were at the height of the race at the moment. At this moment Trotsky criticised the party calling it too bureaucratic and less democratic. In 1924, Zinoviev and Kamenev built up a ferocious campaign against Trotsky, which questioned his loyalty to Lenin and criticised him about the 1917 revolution, in which he was a bit unwilling to support Lenin's actions. During this time, Stalin thought wisely and stayed in the background.…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin became the leader of the Soviet Union in 1928 and became Lenin’s successor. Stalin was a dictator but with his leadership he developed Russia from a backward country to a world superpower. Stalin had many triumphs during his leadership and brought both good and bad long lasting effects to Russia. Joseph Stalin’s aims were to make Russia an industrial and military superpower, and this was a time of clarity and strength for his followers. Therefore, he was also responsible for 20 million deaths and was an unfathomable toll that overshadowed many of his other accomplishments. Stalin may have been…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after Lenin’s rule there was a fight for power between Trotsky and Stalin. In the end, Stalin prevailed and earned leadership of the Soviet Union during the mid-1920s. However, once Stalin came to power, the lives of the society changed dramatically. Stalin’s wished to restore society which caused him to reverse Lenin’s previous work. Stalin revoked many laws concerning women’s emancipation because he wanted to strengthen tradition and build up the population.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin had a grip on Russia and had enough power to change the entire country. Lenin appointed Stalin for the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin had worked his way up within the party and would become dictator for 25 years until he died. While he was the leader he was ruthless and would cause the deaths of millions of people. In order to just become the leader of the Soviet Union Stalin played Zinoviev, Trotsky, who I for some reason feel got the short end of the stick with Stalin, and Kamenev against each other and this led him to be the undisputed leader of the the Communist party and dictator. Economically Stalin did not agree with the New Economic Policy that had been instituted by Lenin, which had been working, so he decided to increase the state’s role in the economy. He did this by increasing control over industry and making sure the workers were making equal wages as well as collectivization of agriculture which did not bode over well with the farmers who instead of giving up their animals killed them.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin seemed to be on good terms with Lenin until Stalin had spoken to Lenin’s wife Nadezhda Krupskaya following Lenin’s appraisal of Trotsky which Krupskaya had cited, and Lenin certainly did not like the way Stalin had spoken to her. In short, he amended his last testament and was making it clear that Stalin had to go because he could not be trusted, was rude and was an arrogant. In the party, Stalin had always been perceived as a dull, mediocre and uninteresting person who was happy to get on with dull, mediocre and uninteresting jobs which mainly consisted of administration and he proved he was good at this which was why he was ultimately appointed as the General Secretary of the party among other positions prior to this one – a potentially dire move by Lenin following his death simply because it put Stalin in a position where could place his friends and allies in high positions in the pending power struggle. This then raises the question how exactly Stalin came to be the dominant leader, and I will address potential reasons which could be argued as to…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Stalin gained power in Russia, his opposition grew within the Communist party. Initially Stalin was a mediator, between the two main factions, in the debate about when to replace the New Economic Policy, and what to replace it with. The left of the party, Trotsky, and his supporters, wanted the New Economic Policy to be replaced, as soon as possible with a centrally planned economy, and for all farms to be collectivized. The right of the party, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin, wanted to maintain the New Economic Policy, and a gradualist approach to collectivization.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following Lenin’s untimely death in 1924, the Communist Leadership in Russia was thrown into disarray. Months of ideological confusion, full of proposals of ideas for the future of socialism, brought about potential contenders for party leadership and amongst these was Stalin. Through the next 5 year period, a great power struggle occurred between the contenders, but Stalin eventually emerged successful as the new leader of the USSR. Stalin’s position as General Secretary and other factors all contributed to this appointment.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays