Preview

State Judges Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State Judges Case Study
The Grand Prairie City Council approved attorney Bryan Arnold as presiding municipal court judge on March 1.
The position is an appointed position and not an elected one like most state judges, said Ron Postell Grand Prairie city attorney. Arnold applied for the position and went through an interview. Tom Hart, Grand Prairie city manager, selected Arnold for the position. The city council then had to approve a two-year contract for the position.
Arnold will make $165,462 annually according to the Grand Prairie Operating Budget Expenditure Information. Nancy Robb, previous municipal court judge announced her retirement March 1, according to the agenda legislation details. Arnold will begin as the judge April 4.
Arnold has run his own law practice for more than 20
…show more content…
“A lot of his experience has been working with young people, and we think that is a good combination for someone who will sit in a position that has to make very important decisions, but also wants to see especially young people learn and do better in the future,” Hart said. Arnold will use his experience as an attorney to be a judge who has a good understanding of protecting an individual’s rights, Hart said.
“I think he’s going to approach the judge’s job with one that is a serious job that he will do with the upmost integrity, but I think he’s also going to take the judge’s position and see what he can do the help people,” Hart said. “There’s times a decision a judge makes can effect a person’s life in the future.”
Arnold helped form the Sports Corporation board that established Lone Star Park, a horse race track, Hart said. The board started in 1992. Part of the time he was part of the board he led a campaign to get a half cent sales tax passed to build Lone Star Park, Arnold said. Arnold was also founder of a local rotary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exhibit 16.5 is a final pretrial order for the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case on the pretrial order is Austin Bennaza vs Buddy Smith. The notice states stipulations and statements that deal with the case. It details each parties current state as well as their part in the case. It states what each party owes the other in dealing with the case. It also states how long the trial should take. It allocates specific time to each task associated with the case. The document needs to be prepared and submitted jointly by opposing trial counsel. The pretrial order also needs to be signed by the pretrial judge.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past few weeks the legal advisory/employee team has been acting as an advisor to the Minnesota Department of Baby Boomer Retention, also referred to as the Department, carefully outlining advisory reports to management against their case against Mr. Chuckles. The advisory report offered the necessary information and terminology for the entire arbitration process. Specifically the final & binding, due process, just cause, swearing in of witnesses, precedential impact & subpoenas. As the weeks progressed management has conducted their opening statement, offered their witness list, witness statements, various exhibits/documents that support their stance on the issue, and lastly the closing statement.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first case there is called Limited Jurisdiction Courts and the steps in there is 1- Initial Appearance – is the defendant’s first appearance in court, and the defendant is advised of the charges against you Arraignment – The defendant appears in court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty,the next step is…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Business owners and landlords have a duty to protect patrons and tenants from foreseeable criminal acts of third parties occurring on their premises.…

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Webb knew that Mr. Gross was my judge. I would like to see if I can change judges in this case because he's biased ,he's rude, and I don't feel like I'm going to get a fair result with him as my judge. Plus it appears that he doesn't know a lot about family law he did not even know what a MC031 form was…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court should appeal the incorrect actions taking by Prosecutor Forbes for removing the only two African-Americans from the jury stand. Prosecutor Forbes actions were a races act due to the fact, that all jurors should have the right to attend regardless of the race, nationality or gender. The only reason Forbes could remove the two African-Americans from the jury, is if both of the jurors were a close friend of the defendant Woodson. Then the prosecutor has the right to remove both jurors from the jury.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The States of the United States have individual and unique governments with many similarities. All states are required by the constitution to have republican governments. Despite their similarities, all states have different government structures and procedures, as you will see in the following comparisons of Missouri and Texas state court systems.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    English 3 5.03

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judge Stevens - A mayor of Jefferson. Eighty years old, Judge Stevens attempts to delicately handle the complaints about the smell emanating from the Grierson property. To be respectful of Emily’s pride and former position in the community, he and the aldermen decide to sprinkle lime on the property in the middle of the night.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For a “brutal, cowardly attack” on a 27-year-old man, run over and left for dead, Agustin Caruso pleaded guilty to manslaughter Monday and was sentenced to 8 1/2 years in prison.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gampero's Case Analysis

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page

    If I was the judge presiding over Gampero's case I would have acted professional, and honorable. Judge force Charles Gampero J.R into accepting a plea bargain by using his position over the courtroom to influence his choice. I would have not told a man if he was found guilty, I would give him the maximum sentenced of 25 years. United States of America is innocent before guilty, and judge Francis Egitto demonstrate behavior that was unconstitutional. In my opinion, I would have not assume the man was guilty, but innocence because as a judge I took a oath to be a servant of the courtroom. Additionally, individuals such as judges must take a neutral stand against information, until it has been proven in court. This to me is truly a professional,…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We need Justices in the courts to put their jobs and the needs of the people before themselves and any of their personal biases. How could a Justice rule accurately to what the people need and what is fair if they do not listen to what is being needed or even outright reject something only on the grounds that their personal beliefs deem it wrong? If a Justice was allowed to do this, black rights would never have been established, the rights for gays to get married would never have passed and women may have never been able to vote or be paid accordingly. Because of issues such as these, we need someone who puts their duties before all…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Speech On Leeks

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages

    All this success led to Gus being a natural selection for judge, and found himself in more and more demand. He was harsh though, one of his friends calls him the “hanging judge”. But, in fairness, if you didn’t win, he would take the time to explain exactly why, even if you didn’t like it.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays