Preview

State of Confusion: Determining the Difference Between Personal Jurisdiction and Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State of Confusion: Determining the Difference Between Personal Jurisdiction and Subject Matter Jurisdiction
State of Confusion Paper
Sarah E Kimball-Lincon
LAW 421
October 22, 2012
David Feldhein, JD

State of Confusion Paper
Determining the difference between personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction will help to determine which location a lawsuit should be filed in. Defining interstate commerce and which level of government has the right to place restrictions on the commerce is important when discussing a lawsuit. Understanding how lawsuits work as well as what lawyers will try to introduce within the court will allow the defendant to be able to better predict the outcome of the lawsuit.
Personal Jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction also known as personam jurisdiction is the courts authority over the parties involved in the dispute (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p59). Personal jurisdiction, defined in this manner, the parties involved can be a business or an individual. It is the courts responsibility to determine fairness to all parties involved while complying with the laws of the federal constitutional requirements. The court determines personal jurisdiction over a party who lives in another state by a state long-arm statute. The court must determine if the out of state defendant, transacts business in the other state, commits a negligent act which leads to a loss to the other party, or owns property within the state (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p61). The court will look at Truckers lawsuit to determine if the State of Confusion’s statute causes a loss to Trucker’s business. The injurious effect will be taken into consideration at the lower courts level. Does the statute of the State of Confusion cause an injurious effect on the Tanya Trucker a resident of the State of Denial?
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Subject matter jurisdiction is the courts authority over the dispute between the two parties (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p59). State courts are who handle any matter involving state statues, state common law or a state constitutional issue (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p60).



References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Kansas and the defendant is a citizen of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 340 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of the State of Missouri and the defendant is a citizen of the State of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. ISSUE: The issue is “Did Court of Appeal of Louisiana approve lack of personal jurisdiction of an internet merchandiser?”…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 311 wk 1 disc 1

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page

    Based on the information provided in the first hypothetical case problem in our text, if Javier decided to sue Energy-Auto Inc., Javier would be the plaintiff (the entity that is suing) and Energy-Auto Inc. would be the defendant (the entity that is being sued). Javier could sue in New York as our text states “… the action should be brought in the state with closer ties to the litigants or the subject matter of the action” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2). He could also sue in Oklahoma, as that is where Havier was injured, so long as he provides due process (service of process). His injury in Oklahoma meets the minimum contact requirement for personal jurisdiction. “Minimum contacts may consist of doing business in the forum state, causing an injury there, or owning real estate there” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2).…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Does the federal court have the authority to hear the claim?…

    • 3692 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal jurisdiction and civil jurisdiction brings about the protective jurisdiction of courts. They necessitate the occasions for instituting the proceedings. Further criminal and civil jurisdiction therefore implies with respect to the mature of the subject matter and civil or criminal mature of the actions. Such an action therefore does not aim in the creation of another authority. Territorial aspects may come in hand, however the nature of the action determines the jurisdiction the case will be handled. It merely extends the limits of the particular jurisdiction. It is therefore not mandatory.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CarrieWhite unit6 Seminar

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then you went over jurisdiction of a court refers to those in cases in which it may exercise lawful authority which is determined by statute or constitution. The question that you asked I honestly think that answer would be yes. Then you went over the state court system many differences among state courts which use three tiered structure which are trial courts of limited jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide a specific case. Personal Jurisdiction is when a court has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals that reside in that specific state or that committed a crime within that state. Subject matter jurisdiction is when courts only have jurisdiction over certain matters such as appellate and bankruptcy courts.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry, a resident of Nevada, sued Adam, a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. He sought $60,000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles, California. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? No the federal court does not have jurisdiction over this case. In order for this case to fall within the guidelines of a federal suit it would have to qualify for diversity of citizenship. Diversity of citizenship exists in suits between (1) citizens of different states, (2) a citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign country, and (3) a state and citizens of another state. In this case since Henry is a resident of Nevada and Adam is a resident of Utah he can file the suit in California where the accident occurred but it…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisdiction

    • 5339 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Jurisdiction (from the Latin ‘ius’, ‘iuris’ meaning "oath" and ‘dicere’ meaning "to speak") is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area…

    • 5339 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ellasaurus Products

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court's authority to decide a particular type of dispute. For example, in the United States, federal court’s have subject-matter jurisdiction over issues governed by federal law( such as bankruptcy,copyright, patent, and federal tax matters) and state of courts have subject matter jurisdiction isues governed by state laws (such as professional liscencing and state tax matters.’;;…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays