Gudea was a ruler of Mesopotamia and focused his efforts on rebuilding the temples of Lagash; he was also rather vain in insisting that statues in his likeness were created and placed throughout the remodeled temples. This particular statue is crafted from Diorite and shows him in a seated position with some Sumerian text inscribed in his robing detailing the actual temples he renovated and his identity. It differs from the statue of Memi and Sabu not only in its choice of construction material but also in the fact that Gudea most likely had this and many others made to congratulate himself and preserve his honor throughout time. There's good chance that Memi and Sabu did not ask for their statue to be created but it was made anyway according to primitive religious and burial…
The monument is in a very good condition although some part of the stone are chipped off. The overall form and figure were kept in a very good condition; therefore, it shows the advantages of using marble. Since marble is a long lasting material, the work that created on marble stone would last longer than other materials. But at the same time marble stone is a very hard material to carve on, and it would take more time to create a piece of art than using any other materials. Also, the transportation would be hard, because it is very heavy, so damages would…
The museum went through the voluminous processes to prove its authenticity. A geologist determined that the statue originated in the island of Thasos, sheathed in a thin layer of calcite, a substance that accumulates on statues over centuries. After months of investigation, the museum staff concluded the thing was genuine, and made the purchase.…
But if I step back and try to look at it logically I can definitely see why this caused so much controversy and 26 years later we are still talking about it and writing papers about the case. Yes, a committee backed by the federal government did commission this piece for a federal plaza and yes, the artist chosen believed that this sculpture would be there forever like the Statue of Liberty for instance. But most people did not understand the symbolism of this piece, it’s just a big dark, metal wall, what is its significance, what is its meaning? The average public would not understand the meaning of the piece, should that matter? I guess my thought is just because the government-funded it doesn’t mean we should be stuck with it forever. Our government funds a lot of things that we as Americans don’t agree with and we should have a say in some of the…
Dr. Calder viewed the statue as cultural patrimony and cultural treasure. He viewed the statue as cultural patrimony because he felt that it belonged to the country of Greece, not just one person. He also viewed it as cultural treasure because it is art that belong to the Greeks from many years ago; it is art that is part of the Greek culture.…
The eight foot statue of Benjamin Franklin that stands in front of Boston’s French Second…
The statue is in the middle of Washington Circle in Washington D.C. The statue cost 60,000 thousand…
The extensive controversy between Great Britain and Greece over the Elgin Marbles has been going on for several hundred years. Ironically, Greece did not exist at the time of the catalyst. It all started in 1801 when the British Lord Elgin, the ambassador to the Ottoman Turks, began to move the marbles from present-day Greece to London. The marbles in question are from the world-famous Parthenon structure in the Athens Acropolis. The temple was built nearly 2,500 years ago. The Elgin Marbles are a set of eighty yards of the Parthenon’s frieze, which is a trademark Greek series of statues that normally sit on the upper exterior walls of a temple (“Parthenon Sculptures”). The real heat of the argument begins in the early twentieth century when a restoration movement was put into motion (Venieri). Greece wants their art back, as they have spent a great deal of money on a museum to house them. Though the legality and ownership of the Elgin Marbles remains a controversy, a compromise can be reached for their location.…
The statue is over 120 years old. To be exact, it is 124 years old and it is deteriorating at a quick pace. The decaying of…
This is a sculpture made by Zenos Frudakis. It is named “Freedom”. This statue is situated in Philadelphia. Zenos said this as reason for making "Freedom": "I wanted to create a sculpture almost anyone, regardless of their background, could look at and instantly recognize that it is about the idea of struggling to break free. This sculpture is about the struggle for achievement of freedom through the creative process. "…
Johannes Gelert is a Danish sculptor that moved to the United States in the 1880’s that went on to receive numerous awards for his works, including a similar style statue bronze statue of Ulysses S. Grant (***). This monument was privately funded by the Union League Club of Chicago, and designed by Frank Batchelder from Minnesota. The Haymarket Police Memorial Statue depicts a bronze Chicago police officer with his right arm raised, standing on a pedestal with the phrase “In the name of the People of Illinois, I command peace” engraved into it [see Figures 2.0, 2.1]. This Haymarket Police Memorial Statue caused public anger and outrage, resulting in widespread vandalism over the next several decades. These vandals and anarchists alike forced the statue to be moved to several different locations at several different times throughout the course of…
Jean-Antoine Houdon’s statue of George Washington is a life-sized marble carving which stands in Virginia State Capitol in Richmond, Virginia, USA. It was commissioned in 1784 by the Virginia General Assembly, and completed in 1792. Houdon’s statue of Washington depicts Washington as realistically as possible. He is shown not as an perfect figure, but as man with physical flaws. This does not, however, detract from displaying him as a powerful figure. In this sculpture Washington is shown with a realistic body, wearing military uniform, leaning against a bundle of sticks and with a plow behind him.…
In 1885 the statue was lying in pieces in New York, but because the US had failed to gather money for a pedestal, the statue couldn't be assembled. In order to fund the pedestal, the publisher John Pulitzer launched a fundraising campaign in his newspaper, The New York World. In just five months, and with most donations of less than a dollar, The New York World raised over $100,000, enough to fund the pedestal and give a gift back to France (Davies, 2013). In today’s dollars, that’s $2,471,674.29 that was raised in less than six months. A crowdfunding project—like the one for the Statue of Liberty’s pedestal—for the National Park Service today has the potential to be a very successful method for increasing the influence of philanthropic donations in the NPS…
The Washington Monument has a long and interesting history. Like how the plan for it was made before George Washington was even elected. But the monument was still not made…
A group of engineers and technicians studied Landowski's submissions and the decision was made to build the structure out of reinforced concrete (designed by Albert Caquot) instead of steel, more suitable for the cross-shaped statue.[6] The outer layers are soapstone, chosen for its enduring qualities and ease of use.[4] Construction took nine years, from 1922 to 1931 and cost the equivalent of US$250,000 ($3,300,000 in 2014). The monument was opened on…