Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men By Juror

Similarly to beauty, the fabric of reality is altered within the eye of the beholder. In order to promote our chances of social acceptance, people have to be quick, and pragmatic decision makers, able to denote and comprehend their individual existence as part of a larger jigsaw. Although we are continuously evolving throughout our life as independent beings, feeling intrinsic in a collective society, remains an unconscious priority of ours. Consequently our judgment and deduction skills are influenced by group conformity, prejudice, and emotional associations.
To begin with, social norms possess a quintessential role in affecting one’s sense of judgment. People often conform to preexisting opinions and comply with other’s viewpoint merely because they are afraid of being ostracized or rejected from society. The unconscious fear of negative social consequences such as isolation may cause one to change his initial
To further elaborate, implicit attitudes are subtle responses imprinted within our personality that we have little conscious control over (Weiten, 2017). The majority of them consist of racial or gender prejudices, which nowadays are considered inappropriate or socially unacceptable. Still, most people possess rudiments of these negative stereotypes and let them alter their attitudes (Weiten, 2017). In reference “12 Angry Men”, Juror 10 almost condemned an innocent to the death penalty due to his tactless and strong racial tendencies. His attitude associated the boy with a negative stereotype and clouded his logical judgment (12 Angry Men, 1957). Individuals tend to disassociate themselves from this phenomenon, claiming they are immune from this biased perception occurring among “the uncultured or old-fashioned” portion of society, however this array of thinking is widely common and must be identified and