Stith And Krause: A Comparative Analysis

After reading Stith’s history writing and Guderjan and Krause’s anthropology writing there is an awareness made about the differences and similarities. The similarities that came from the two writings is how they both exhibit a cause and effect, pictures, and references. However, the differences that are evident include the use of the photos, and one uses sections. Throughout the writings, Stith and Guderjan includes photos that are relevant to the topic they introduce. Stith uses a photo to represent a Native during the American Civil War and Guderjan uses ditched fields as a reference. Moreover, the other trait they have in common is how their topics flow as a cause an effect of their subject of either the Civil War or ditched fields.