5. Topic, subtopic, and section # for the recognition of stock compensation: ASC 505 –…
employee share options on January 1, 2010. The awards have a grant-date fair value of…
According FASB, compensation plans include all arrangements by which employees receive shares of stock or other equity instruments of the employer or the employer incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price of the employer’s stock. Compensation cost should be measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period, under the fair value based method. Compensation costs are recognized for other types of stock-based compensation plans under Opinion 25, including plans with variable, usually performance-based, features. Some stock-based compensation plans require an employer to pay an employee, either on demand or at a specified date, a cash amount determined by the increase in the employer’s stock price from a specified level. An entity must measure compensation cost for that award in the amount of the changes in the stock price in the periods in which the changes occur. Regarding stock options, fair value is determined using an option-pricing model that takes into account the stock price at the grant date, the exercise price, the expected life of the option, the volatility of the underlying stock and the expected dividends on it, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. Under the provisions of the statement 123 of the FASB it is a requirement that companies report stock options on the income statement as an expense. The provision was revised in 2005 due to the prior issues dealing with overstated income on financial statement.…
Murray Compensation, Inc. (Murray), an SEC registrant that provides payroll processing and benefit administration services to other companies, granted 100,000 “at-the-money” employee share options on January 1, 2006. The awards have a grant-date fair value of $6, vest at the end of the third year of service (cliff-vesting), and have an exercise price of $21.…
Choosing a compensation plan that allows a company to encourage long-term devotion of a manager is a challenge for many companies. The advances in technology have created New Economy service driven firms that often don’t have traditional tangible assets like buildings and capital equipment. When the nature of economic output changes, the question must arise, should accounting practice be adjusted to reflect the new emergence of the service and technology economy. More importantly, how does one use compensation to entice management to make sound decisions that are not short term but that are geared towards building long-term value of for the firm? The EVA approach to measuring economic profit and its complementary compensation tools can benefit stakeholders into an integrated system that rewards employees, middle managers, executives and shareholders towards the common goal of creating value for the firm. It seems that traditional compensation systems (based on traditional accounting measures like profit, cash flow, ROI) can miss the mark on the true performance of a corporation over the long term. Stern and Steward have proposed EVA compensation systems that, in theory, should provide alignment for all stakeholders. I will now look at two influential articles and provide and analysis of the merit in using Stern and Stewart’s proposed compensation measures.…
Stock options are typically handed out to only the highest level managers and CEOs. However, there have been some companies that have tried offering them to lower level managers as well with mixed results. Stock options have a lot of positive and negative attributes that may make them a somewhat risky solution for alternative…
The compensation package achieved Sunbeam’s goals of maximizing shareholders wealth. It motivated Dunlap to drive up the price of the stock. Although the short term profits benefited shareholders, no incentives to create a long term, profitable company existed. In fact, it gave Dunlap an even bigger incentive to sell the company once the stock price reached a high, favorable value. Dunlap’s compensation package consisted of little to no risk and had a ten year term. The restricted stock rewards became vested in two years. His purchase of 244,898 shares indicated that profits would drastically increase. Dunlap’s compensation package affected thousands of employees at Sunbeam. The compensation package favored shareholders but disfavored employees. They had no value in this model. The compensation package only protected shareholders wealth. The structure of Dunlap’s compensation package was aligned his views of shareholder primacy. He sacrificed values for a boost in stock price and economic efficiency. The stockholders of Sunbeam greatly profited, and Dunlap reaped a majority of the benefits. The compensation package should relate to performance in order to produce the right incentives. The compensation package provided Dunlap with an excessive amount of shares of stock and stock rewards, but at least it provided an…
This is a common method used by corporations to compensate executives. The presumption is that executives will work harder since they want their own stock to rise in value and, therefore, have the best interests of shareholders in mind. Employees with stock options need to know whether their stock is vested. This means the stock will retain its full value even if they are no longer employed with that company.…
December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 123, Shared- Based Statement, which took the place of Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and replaced Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock issued to Employees. Share-based payment is “a transaction in which the entity receives or acquires goods or services either as consideration for its equity instruments or by incurring liabilities for amounts based on the price of the entity 's shares or other equity instruments of the entity. The accounting requirements for the share-based payment depend on how the transaction will be settled, that is, by the issuance of (a) equity, (b) cash, or (c) equity or cash” (Deloitte, 2010). Statement No 123 covers a variety of compensation agreements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Shared-based payment will give financier and other financial statement users with additional comprehensive and unbiased financial information by having the reimbursement cost relate to the share-based payment documented on the financial statement. This cost is measured by the fair value of the company’s equity or liability tools issued. “This Statement is the result of a two-year effort to respond to requests from investors and many others that the FASB improve the accounting for share-based payment arrangements with employees” (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2004).…
Stock options are tied directly to the performance of the executive and the company when the executive is making good and sound decisions then the company will profit from this and so too will the executive. Executives are compensated…
World War I was a never before seen type of war. New tactics, artillery, and military technology from the Industrial Revolution led to unforeseen effects. Trenches were a widely used tactic in the response to the new and improved artillery, such as the machine gun. Also, updated medical treatments on the frontline resulted in men’s lives being saved. This combination led to many soldiers surviving facial disfigurement injuries that would have killed them in the past.…
choices of options over cash-only compensation, then we estimate that the median rm in our…
The EMH factors that investors are all gifted with similar intelligence and that the message the financial statements are trying to convey are all comprehended fairly and equally by all investor. The reality is that individuals may have limited attention where they may not have the time to process all available information, and might concentrate on only certain elements of the information, such as the bottom line. On the other hand, individuals may be conservative, and not react fast enough to the information.…
In the 17th century, when many other colonies used slaves and servants for work and business, racism was heavy. At a small area in Pennsylvania, there was a protest against slavery. It was in Germantown. The settlers here were Christian like many of other colonies. Although slavery was common in this town and useful for many things, they against treating a human like stuff. They didn't agree with any of the ways people used for slaves in America as well as in Europe. Especially, they featured the importance of conscience. Allowing their conscience to be free was a good way to live better with their faith in God and to stand away from bad things. Freedom in their mind was the first step to gain all the liberty that everyone in America deserved.…
• The all-option portfolio, B, responds more than proportionately to changes in stock value; it is levered. • Portfolio C, T-bills plus calls, shows the insurance value of options. – C ‘s T-bill position cannot be worth less than $9270. – Some return potential is sacrificed to limit downside risk.…