Early life: Derek Bentley attended Norbury Secondary Modern School in 1944, after failing the eleven-plus examination. In March 1948 Bentley and another boy were arrested for theft. In September 1948, he was sentenced to serve three years at Kingswood Approved School, near Bristol. Bentley was released from Kingswood school on 28 July 1950, and was a recluse for the rest of the year. In March 1951, Bentley was employed by a furniture removal firm but was forced to leave the job after injuring his back in March 1952. In May 1952, Bentley was taken on by the Croydon Corporation as a waste collector but was demoted tostreet cleaning for unsatisfactory performance in July 1952. Two months after that, Bentley was sacked by the Corporation
Bentley's case: Bentley and Craig were charged with murder. They were tried by jury before the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Lord Goddard, at the Old Bailey in London between 9 December and 11 December 1952. Christmas Humphreys, Senior Treasury Counsel, led for the prosecution. At the time of the burglary attempt and Miles's death, murder was a capital offence in England and Wales. Minors fewer than 18 were not sentenced to death: consequently, of the two defendants, only Bentley faced the death penalty if convicted. The doctrine of felony murder or "constructive malice" meant that a charge of manslaughter was not an option, as the "malicious intent" of the armed robbery was transferred to the shooting.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Before making the final decision the court considered the following factors, length of delay, prejudiced to the accused, explanation for the delay, and Waiver of Appellants. The Supreme Court then concluded that the delay of 2 years after the appellant's preliminary trial was unreasonable. The Crown did not justify the institutional delay and did not prove that the delay prejudiced the delay of the accused. Therefore, their final decision was to set the four men free as the delay was excessive. I agree with the court's decision because the Crown did not justify the reason for the 2-year delay, which was a violation of the men's charter rights. The men were also held in custody for 6 months before being proven guilty. This to me was the right ruling of the case because no serious crime was committed when the incident occurred, and the two-year delay was not appropriate for this type of…
- 649 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Two days following Davis’s conviction on charges of the murder of Officer Mark MacPhail, jury recommended the death penalty and Davis was sentenced to death. Officer MacPhail’s family wasn’t allowed to testify but Davis comment with; “Spare my life, just give me a second chance. That’s all I ask. I was convicted for offenses that I didn’t commit.” If the victim was still alive to testify, he could have confirmed Davis’s statement or better yet identify the true shooter in the case rather it really was Troy Davis or not.…
- 471 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hunt was given a chance to plead guilty and then just serve 5 years. He refused for he knew he did not commit the crime and would not let Deborah Sykes death land on his shoulders. He was put through a second trial which was held in Catawba County in front of an all white jury. This time two jail informants claimed that Hunt plead guilty to them, Hunt was sentenced again in prison for life (Innocent Project).…
- 791 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Because Miss Climpson believes that there is reasonable doubt the jury is hung. Similar to the American court system the jury must all unanimously agree guilty or not guilty. To the judges credit he obeys English law and decides to give Vane a fresh trial. Even after trying to provoke a unanimous decision. “Do you think that with a little bit more time you may be able to reach an agreement” (Sayers 35). At this time the judge persistently tries to get the jury to agree and even seems to be looking for every loophole he can get to just get the jury to agree. “We quite understand the evidence, but we cannot agree about it” (Sayers 35). The foreman replies to the judge saying he appreciates it him trying to help the jury with something, but the jury has already voted and they cannot agree on the murder case. I don’t know if it has more to do with the fact that the judge wanted the trial to be over already or if he strongly believed that Vane was…
- 914 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. What was Willingham charged with? What happened to Willingham? He was charged with arson and murder which he was later executed for.…
- 305 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…
- 719 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The juvenile court judge did not rule on this motion filed by Kent's attorney. Instead, he entered a motion stating that the court was waiving jurisdiction after making a "full investigation." The judge did not describe the investigation or the grounds for the waiver. Kent was subsequently found guilty in criminal court on six counts of housebreaking and robbery and sentenced to 30 to 90 years in prison.…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Huntley was tried with two counts of murder on the 3rd November 2003, with the defendant pleading a case of manslaughter claiming the unintentional drowning of Holly Wells whilst stemming a nosebleed and suffocating Jessica Chapman in the process of stifling her screams at seeing what had happened to her friend. The jury rejected these claims and with a verdict of 11-1 found Huntley guilty of murder. He was sentenced to life imprisonment.…
- 596 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to Increase Mater’s quote of the trials Governor Phipps dissolved the special court. The only reason he did it was because his own wife stood accused and the ply actually worked on the governor. After that only 3 out of 63 people were found…
- 1394 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Throughout the past couple of months my fellow peers and I have been studying the topic ‘challenge’ and how it affects our lives and people around us. In our everyday lives we are confronting challenges, some are as small as walking up a few steps, and some are larger and more challenging that could be life or death circumstances.…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The novel ‘Looking for Alibrandi' points out aspects, like multiculturalism, immigration, social differences, but also love, friendship and family life. It explores relationships between Josie Alibrandi, Jacob Coote and John Barton through their family cultures and backgrounds. The Alibrandi family has big impacts on Josie as an individual, John Barton’s family impacts him as well although differently.…
- 619 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this case, William Furman committed a robbery of a private home. The resident of the home awoke to find Furman in his house. Furman tried to escape and while doing so, he tripped and fired his gun accidently, which killed the victim. He was taken to trial and found guilty of murder. Because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was eligible for the death penalty according to the felony murder rule. The rule of felony murder states that if an offender kills, with or without intention, during a dangerous crime, they are guilty of murder. Furman was sentenced to death but the case was taken to the Supreme Court before his punishment was carried out. The issue of the case was whether the death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. If it was considered cruel and unusual punishment, then it would also be in violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments.…
- 447 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Smith were found guilty of murder in the first degree and their punishment is death. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt in your defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty... penalty-death." (303)…
- 326 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
You may have heard the terms: man of the house, stay at home mom, housewife, and the working man. These terms stem from societal normality’s. They are terms that are used to describe gender roles. The classification of what is expected of the man or women. The domestic women and working man are ideals, some that are described in the late 1940s thru the 1950’s. Did the role of characters like June Cleaver just appear? Who said that women must stay at home with dinner ready and a pie in the oven for her family? Where did these standards come from?…
- 1008 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays