Preview

Stop and Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stop and Frisk
Stop and Frisk
Shauna Hinchley
CJ105
April 29 2013
Mr. Kagawa

Stop and Frisk The stop and frisk is when a police officer stops a person, one he/she believes is suspicious individual, and with lawful intent, pats down in search of a hidden weapon in the suspect 's clothing. It seems like a controversial law, arguable yet justifiable. How would you feel if you were stopped by a policeman? Probably scared, angry, and even confused? Of course, if you were innocent. What if you were a drug dealer, or a kidnapper? Perhaps even serial killer equipped with weaponry? To be caught before performing an illicit act based on careless movements and the lack of proper self composure, seems to be justice to me. . (Gaines, 2012)"The precedent for the ever-elusive definition of a "reasonable" suspicion in stop-and-frisk situations was established in Terry v. Ohio (1968)" An Ohio detective by the name of McFadden, an older detective which held experience in the area, noticed two certain individuals acting peculiarly in the downtown beat. Actions such as passing by a store, peering into windows, and then repositioning to a corner of a street in discussion. Surely enough, this didn 't seem that strange at the time. That is, until another man joined in the conversation, just to leave quickly. Not long after that, the three men reunited at another corner a few blocks away from their last location. With this reasonable suspicion in mind, McFadden encountered the three and asked for identification. Muttering their responses, McFadden then carried out the frisking procedure and discovered two handguns. The Supreme Court believed it was right and reasonable and McFadden won the case, with the overall fact that he did what was necessary to not only himself, but the citizens in the area. Police do this for a myriad of reasons, one is to protect society from potential harm when suspicion rises. It is always good to prevent crime before it happens. Though it not as easy as it



Bibliography: Gaines, L. K. (2012). Criminal Justice In Action 7th Edition. Wadsworth. Rice, B. (2007). When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street? . Retrieved from: http://www.legalzoom.com/us-law/privacy/when-can-police-stop

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One officer testified that he stopped appellant because the situation "looked suspicious, and we had never seen that subject in that area before."…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plainclothes Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland to suppress purse swatches, shoplifting, and robbery of merchants plus shoppers when he observed John W. Terry and two cohorts case a corner store for a robbery. Officer McFadden became suspicious, went up to the three men and conducted a pat-down. When the officer pat-down the outside of Terry's coat, he felt something hard in Terry's outer pocket that felt like a gun. McFadden reached into that pocket only and confiscated an illegally possessed gun. Officer proceeded and arrested Terry.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1963, a Cleveland detective observed three gentlemen hanging out in front of a store and their behavior was somewhat suspicious. The detective suspected that the two gentlemen were planning to rob the store, so he decided to conduct a pat-down Terry and discovered a revolver in his coat. Subsequently, Terry was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and later found guilty. The petitioner claimed that "stop and frisk" constituted an unreasonable search and seizure. In 1968, the Supreme Court established the standard for allowing police officers to perform a stop and frisk of a suspect in Terry v. Ohio case. Furthermore, a stop and frisk is detaining a person by law enforcement officer for the purpose of an investigation, accompanied by…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case originated back in October 1963, involving John W. Terry and Richard Chilton. The two men were seen on a corner by veteran police detective, Martin McFadden, of the Cleveland Police Department, Ohio. According to the officer, the two men were acting in a suspicious way, by peering into the same store window. The two men were seen making multiple trips toward the window, when a third man came into the scenario. The officer suspected the men of “casing” the store for robbery. The officer followed the men and then stopped and questioned them. He first grabbed Terry and conducted a pat down and located a pistol on the inside of his jacket. Finding the weapon, he ordered the men into the nearby store, where a more invasive search ensued. He then removed Terry’s jacket and removed the weapon from its holster. A weapon was also found on Chilton, and both were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stop is less than an arrest. If the police become suspicious they can quickly frisk…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The first sentence of Chief Justice Warren's opinion in Terry v Ohio, is as follows: "This case presents serious questions concerning the role of the Fourth Amendment in the confrontation on the street between the citizen and the policeman investigating suspicious circumstances.” According to Chief Justice Warren this issue had never been approached in the Supreme Court. Warren also stated “This case is dealing on the one hand with is frequently argued that in dealing with the rapidly unfolding and often dangerous situations on city streets the police are in need of an escalating set of flexible responses, graduated in relation to the amount of information they possess. For this purpose it is urged that distinctions should be made between a "stop" and an "arrest" (or a "seizure" of a person), and between a "frisk" and a "search." He believed this could be imposed because it was a minor inconvenience to the person being searched and was acceptable in order for effective law enforcement and secure the safety of the…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Terry, one of the men arrested, claimed that Officer McFadden lacked evidence and probable cause to perform the frisk. To engage in this action, Officer McFadden would need hard evidence that showed that the men were on the verge of committing a crime. John Terry claimed that the search was illegal because it invaded his right to privacy.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is a person's sudden flight from identifiable police officer, patrolling a high crime area, suspicious to justify the officer's stop and frisk of that person? This was the question that the justices of the Supreme Court were asking themselves when they heard the case of Illinois v. Wardlow on the date of November 2, 1999.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law enforcement officers in the United States often perform “Terry stops”, as part of the work routinely associated with police patrol. In policing the term “Terry Stops” which refers to the “stop and frisk” practice, was coined in 1968, and derives from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1(1968) . In that landmark case, it was ruled that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, that prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” of individuals by American government agents, is not violated, when police officers detain, for a short period time an individual whom they reasonably believe to be committing, have committed or about to commit a criminal activity.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bowling, B. and Phillips C., (2007) “Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search”. Modern Law Review. 70(6)…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consensual Encounter

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    In 1968, supreme court stated that in the case of Terry v. Ohio, a police officer can stop an individual for questioning if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person is about to commit, is committing or is going to commit a crime. In addition, supreme court stated that officers can search for weapons for the protection of the officer if he feels threatened.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most Republicans feel it is a effective way of reducing crime, as proven during Rudy Giuliani’s governing of New York City. However, Democrats feel that it is racist and ineffective. Democrats have become overly politically correct in recent years. Currently it is hard to say anything about someone else, that is not considered offensive to Democrats. It is true that in around 85% of stop and frisk situations , the individual has been found to have done nothing wrong. But if using stop and frisk as necessary drops the crime rate as much as it did in New York City, then it is worth using this form of policing. The Republican policies are clearly much better to run a society than Democrat…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays