Preview

stop and frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
stop and frisk
We live in world where police officers are suppose to be protected and help us out when needed. The reality of it is police officers are out here on the beat violating are constitutional rights. Stop and frisk was to help fight crime on the streets but all it caused was racial profiling by officers everyday for the last twelve years. Stop and frisk has been used and abused and young adults are afraid to leave their house because they know they will be harassed for no good reason. Stop and frisk has caused a war between the officers and people no one feels confortable going up to an officer for help because of pervious encounters because of stop and frisks. Why has this been going on for so long and when will it change? The meaning of stop and frisk is, the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon or contraband. One of the most controversial police procedures is the stop and frisk search. This type of limited search occurs when police confront a suspicious person in an effort to prevent a crime from taking place. The police frisk (pat down) the person for weapons and question the person.
Stop and frisk was adopted from the English command law by many American courts. In accordance with English common law, without statutory provisions, a police officer has the power to stop, question, and frisk suspects given reasonable circumstances. Based on a standard, which holds less than probable cause, this power is granted upon the standard of reasonable suspicion. The whole theory behind stop and frisk in urban communities is the broken window theory which is if there are houses in the area that are abandon it can lead to young adults getting into mistress in order to avoid that police officer would stop and question these peoples were about. Over the years till present time stop and frisk has been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The 2011 statistics of the Stop-And-Frisk policy reiterated the racist tendencies, predominantly against Blacks, within the state institution of policing during the era of neoliberal justice. The reported Stop-And-Frisk incidences in 2011 numbers are as follow; there were a total of 685,724 incidents reported, Blacks contributed 53% or 350,743 reported incidents to the total, and whereas Whites contributed to…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the stop-and-frisk may seem like a great procedure and that it may keep the streets safer, there are downfalls to it. The policy was created to keep guns off the street and drop crime rates throughout the cities; however it has often been rumored to be unreasonably racist, and target only the minorities. Furthermore, saying it has made streets safer is debatable, and if it has is it at the expense of another person’s rights? According to NYPD data reports in 2011 684,330 stops were conducted in New York, which is an increase by 524,873 since the year 2003 and they have only found an addition 176 guns per year. With those numbers, one would hope that the number of additional weapons obtained would be significantly higher.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “stop and frisk” or “Terry frisk” law is one of the most controversial laws in America. The law came about via a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. This only holds if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the suspect maybe presently armed and or dangerous. The coming about of this law all started with a concealed weapons arrest in Cleveland, Ohio in the early 1960’s.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes I feel as though some officers take it for far and do things that they shouldn't. If someone knows what's wrong and right they would know better than to go out and do something dumb. I feel as though the stop and frisk is something can be helpful to people everywhere. If someone knows they aren't doing anything wrong or have any weapons on them then there should not be a problem. They should go along with the officer and do whatever is asked and there will not be a problem. It becomes a problem when people do not cooperate and want to start fighting back. Officers are just trying to do their job and protect everyone. Sometimes they can be wrong about who they stop but at least know that person knows what they were doing is suspicious and not good to do around. The case took long to process because it was hard trying to figure out if the officer had the right to seize the weapon. In order to search someone you have to have probable cause. The court then denied the motion to suppress and Terry and Chilton pleaded not guilty. The judge then determined that they were…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 17 ]. Ben Bowling and Coretta Phillips, (2007) ‘Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search’. Modern Law Review. 70(6) 944…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America racial discrimination still exists to this day. Minorities in our country are not seen as equal people. When a person is deprived of their human rights it makes them feel degraded and troubled. In order to become a more civilized country, we must forget the color of our own skin and live with each other as one. In the article “Why Racial Profiling is a Bad Idea” by Tom Head, discusses the way cops pay more attention to those of minority races and how they usually find them guilty of crimes they didn’t commit. Even though many officers will deny their participation in this type of profiling, a lot use this tactic to pull over and arrest Minority races. The article “Racial Profiling Lives On” by Devon Carbado, Cheryl Harris and Kimberle Crenshaw, also displays examples of how racial profiling continues to this day. There are many ways cops can search/arrest African Americans or other Minorities for no reason and still keep from breaking the Fourth Amendment and the authors of “Racial Profiling Lives On” supports there claims with emotional examples that appeal to a pathological type of audience.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First let’s ask what does Stop and frisk actually mean legally? “It’s the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon.”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police and Frisk

    • 1149 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stop and Frisk needs to have restrictions, the officers executing it, have an excessive amount of rights. The idea of an officer randomly pulling an individual to the side and searching them, stripping them of innocence, simply because they “fit the description” is absurd! Especially since, this is after all, the United States of America, a nation of justice and freedom. Having restrictions on stop and frisk…

    • 1149 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jones, D. R. (2011, Sep 15-Sep 21, 2011). "Stop & frisk" - an abuse of police power. New York Amsterdam News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/896738696?accountid=27899…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Officers work for many hours and most of those hours are stopping people on the street to see what they carry. Stop and frisk is “One of the most controversial police procedures is the stop and frisk search. This type of limited search occurs when police confront a suspicious person in an effort to prevent a crime from taking place. The police frisk (pat down) the person for weapons and question the person,” (Farlex, 2008, pg. 1). How stop and frisk became the system used by police officers was…

    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop Frisk

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the city where crime was at all time high during the nineties, the top politicians in New York City decided that something should be done to help stop crime. The NYPD implemented the “Stop and Frisk” policy to bring the crime rate down in the city. However it did more than exceed its expectations and it has been more of a negative than a positive. This policy created tension between the NYPD and the law abiding citizens of New York City because thousands stopped were people of the Black and Latino communities. According to the US Census Bureau NYC has a population of 8,336,697 people. Blacks and Latinos make up 53% of the city population. 85% of New Yorkers stopped are Black and Latino men and 6% of that number actually led to an arrest (NYCLU). At this shocking percentage, it’s apparent that this policy is discriminatory against Blacks and Latinos. Not only is this policy discriminatory, it has violated citizens constitutional rights and been deemed racial profiling.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most Republicans feel it is a effective way of reducing crime, as proven during Rudy Giuliani’s governing of New York City. However, Democrats feel that it is racist and ineffective. Democrats have become overly politically correct in recent years. Currently it is hard to say anything about someone else, that is not considered offensive to Democrats. It is true that in around 85% of stop and frisk situations , the individual has been found to have done nothing wrong. But if using stop and frisk as necessary drops the crime rate as much as it did in New York City, then it is worth using this form of policing. The Republican policies are clearly much better to run a society than Democrat…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people believe that the Stop-and-Frisk Program helps catch potential criminals and reduce crime in New York City. Stop-and-Frisk allows officers in New York City to stop individuals based on reasonable suspicion and search them for any possible illegal contraband. However, many of these searches are often unsuccessful in stopping crime. The practice of stop and frisk by the New York Police Department(NYPD) has not been effectively utilized and raise serious concerns. It is a process that should be discontinued in New York City because of how intrusive it is to the lives of citizens. There are three reasons why the practice of stop and frisk should be discontinued in New York City: racial profiling of minorities; illegal stopping of bystanders;…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays