Stop Snitching Analysis

Control theories would see the use of “snitching” as a way to advance the interest of those with power (state or federal entities) and would not represent the interest of the common citizen or community. Power is directly correlated with ones’ likelihood of being arrested, convicted, and incarcerated without regard for their behavior. Thus those with more power are less likely to be impacted and those with less power are more likely to be impacted. The conflict associated with the “stop snitching” culture is that a lack of adequate rules, accountability and oversight, thus in direct opposition of the larger goal of conviction of criminal offenses (Marx, pg. 112). The moral and societal value of loyalty is a significant factor in the discussion
of “snitching” and is often viewed as immoral. As described by Rich, loyalty arises from the relationship between an individual and the subject of their loyalty, to which that subject either chooses or is thrust upon them (pg. 6). In groups, “snitching” is a significant detour from normative expectations, thus disloyal. The conundrum of necessity and the concern over means to an end mentality is bothersome to most individuals involved with the “stop snitching” movement but for differing reasons. Witness intimidation in high crime areas and the trading of information for leniency are two of the most criticized aspects of informant strategies. Loyalty to the internal community is another consideration for those in high crime neighborhoods as they take care of their own and that often means in support or protection. The mistrust and anti-cooperation community norms in high crime neighborhoods create an adversarial relationship with law enforcement; this conflict is the principle application of criminology conflict theory and condemns those community members who cooperate (Rich, pg. 23).