Strawson: Morally Responsible For Psychology

In his essay, Strawson brings up the argument that we dont make the choices in how our actions become the things they are. Do we choose to like chocolate and hate vanilla? No. It isn't our choice to lick what we like and dislike, it is all psychological. So if we dont have a control on our psychology, then how can we be morally responsible for the consequences of the actions that arise out of that psychology? In order for us to be morally responsible for our actions we have to have created our own psychology, but this is impossible. So since we never had control on what our character is or how or psychology is then how can we be morally responsible for the actions that arise from our psychology? Therefore, Strawson concludes that cannot be