Preview

Strengths and Weaknesses of the North and South

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths and Weaknesses of the North and South
An important strength of the North was its manufacturing capabilities. Factories could mass produce weapons while the South had few facilities capable of providing weapons. The North had experienced an industrial revolution in which many factories produced supplies necessary for an army. Another strength of the North was that it had better railroads and highways, including naval shipping resources used to re-supply forces. The North possessed a large amount of the country's railroad and canal systems. The railroads and canals was necessary for a quick and easy transportation of troops and supplies. More railroads also meant better communication. The North had about 13,000 miles more railroad than the South which meant that the North could reinforce troops quicker. A weakness of the North was that Many of the North's soldiers came from urban areas where they had never seen a rifle before they enlisted. At the onset of the war, the North was not prepared to fight a war. Military readiness of soldiers at the beginning of the war was superior in the South. Young men were accustomed to outdoor life, guns and horses that were part of rural life. The North had a large portion of immigrants and urban raised individuals not accustomed to outdoor life, guns and horses. The majority of Northern recruits were city born or worked on farms. They were not used to living off of the land. The North was in enemy territory and was unfamiliar with the terrain. An important strength of the South was that The majority of the best leaders were Southern born. When the South left the Union, these soldiers went with their home states. The North had some experienced officers. However the North's leadership was inferior to the South. Lincoln was trying to find generals that could win. Many say Grant was the only good general the North had. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, Longstreet, Forest, Stuart, the list could continue. The South was blessed with officers who knew how to fight and make the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Battles have been fought since the dawn of time. Weapons have gradually become more technological and sophisticated each and every time. People learn from their mistakes, as did the Indians in the late 1700s, as well as the Confederate troops from the Civil War. The Union was victorious in this war for freedom, and to this day, the north is more the heart of the country's economy.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economically, the South had one relied resource and one only: cotton. It was the root of their profits, their lives, their surroundings. Despite the white majority of the 1860’s not being a part of the planter aristocracy, it was still their personal American Dream: to own slaves on a plantation with a pretty wife and white kids. The Southern economy depended primarily on the production and working of slaves, as the cheap labor force. On the industrial hand, the North was all about hard work and…equal rights, but mostly hard work. Their primary focus for economic gain was industry. Railroads, telegraphs, machines…oh my! The North also had the advantage of economic stability from the California Gold Rush which aided them to flourish dramatically, though plummeted during the Panic of 1857, which negatively affected the North due to the inflation caused by the gold. Once California was accepted into the Union (as a free state), its abundance of gold deposits held the North on its high horse before the reoccurring panics.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 13 The Road To War

    • 4539 Words
    • 19 Pages

    e. North had equipment ot overcome obstacles in geography and a river fleet. South had the benefit of drawing their interior lines early, but coastline liability was lack of navy…

    • 4539 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benjamin Franklin says that some strengths the colonies have are that they want the best for their country (which they consider to be apart of Great Britain), in the sense that they want glory, power, and business for the king. “The inhabitants of are, in common with the other subjects of Great Britain,” Franklin likely sees this as a strength because to be British is to be of importance. This is because the British saw themselves as intelligent and well-mannered people and saw others, for example, the native americans, not as good as the British. To have something in common with a group of people who’re seen as great is a strength.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One factor that had the greatest impact in driving the country in war was the economic difference. The North and the South had different opinion and beliefs making them divide as a region. The Invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 made gathering cotton possible. This caused an increase in plantations to grow cotton which caused the great need for cheap labor. It meant that slaves were the cheap labor to get the work done. The southern economy became dependent on slavery and cotton. While in the northern states it was established on industry. North was purchasing raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. In the North people had to work together it didn't matter about their culture or class they were but rather had to put their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North controlled 90 percent of the nation’s industrial capacity. Dozens of facilities that produce war material in the north while there was just one munitions plant. Also, the railroad system in the North was more than twice the size the size of the…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relations between the North and South had disagreements over taxes. The North raised the taxes appointed by Congress on imported goods to support their industrial development. On the contrary, in the South, being an agricultural economy had to buy machinery from the foreign and ending paying for those high taxes. On the 1850s, Congress increased the import tax from 15 to 37 percent. The South threatened the northern mandataries; consequently, the north was offended. Besides, Chicago Daily Times published that if the South withdraws from the north, the economy could be affected as income cutting in half (Stanley, 2011). The southerners were unhappy in how the North was limiting their earnings.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North also had an advantage by having more men fight in the war. The abolitionists of the North were very eager to win the war. The citizens fought in the war in other ways. The citizens of Boston began the 54th regiment. Congress had passed one Proclamation not allowing slavery in the West.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly, one of the differences between the North and the South was there source of transportation. In the North they traveled by railroad and steamboats. In the South they traveled by steamboats and railroads. The South's main source for transportation was steamboats because they lived by rivers. The North's main transportation was railroads because they did not live by many rivers.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The south had better gunmen. Had better infantry such as horse men. of course the south had many disadvantages. The south had weak leadership. They barely had a navy…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They fought all the wars at home so it made it a lot better advantage to know your surroundings and where weapons are located rather than having to search.(cite 1) The North also had very many advantages such as: one very good general, advanced technology, transportation, money system, and total warfare. Their general was Abraham Lincoln then he chose a different general.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As said before by many people, the better man in certain situations is the person that learns that they are wrong, are willing to learn from their mistakes, for the sake that they will be able to move on forward from what they learned. The North and the south are like a teacher and student, the North can teach the South as a student how lead the reconstruction era for it to become successful however, its up to the South as the student to see what they think is best. As so the South did act foolish and led to many missed out opportunities for its lands to become successful with allowing the blacks to live as an everyday white person. Now, “the better man is the person who learns from their mistakes” and so that is why I placed the North as the teacher, they learned from their civil war in order to have had been shaped into a great place. Now no side is perfect at this point, with the North agreeing upon the…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Turning Point

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The North were overall set up to be more efficient; they had more factories, more horses, more food, and more…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the war came after the Industrial revolution , different technologies and good strategic thinking . The North had strategies they came around once they had new technologies like trains.Soldiers were sent on train across many routes as a way to sneak up on the Southerners .Their strategy was to make the southerners less aware of their of their arrival .…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays