Preview

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Settlement Conference In Court Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Settlement Conference In Court Cases
The settlement conference is an informal proceeding with a judge that will not preside over the trial of the case. Further, it is not an adversarial hearing, but instead encourages cooperation of the parties in order to resolve the case. Consequently, each party will be required on make concessions if the case is to settle. This is much different than a trial where each party argues its case and then the jury decides who wins and loses. In contrast, no one at the conference will make a decision as to which party is right or wrong, but instead the judge will discuss with each party the strengths and weaknesses of its case in an effort to get the parties to agree to a resolution. In addition, there will be neither a finding of liability nor …show more content…
She may ask each party’s attorney to make a brief statement. The judge will then ask one of the parties, and her attorney, to leave her chambers to allow her to speak with the other party and attorney. Thereafter, she will excuse that first party and attorney from her chambers and have the other party and attorney come back to chambers. She will then have the parties and attorneys switch back and forth in an effort to reach an agreement. I expect that the conference, which is scheduled to start at 8:30 a.m., will last two hours at the most because the judge will have other cases to hear. However, the proceeding may extend beyond that timeframe if the judge believes that the parties will benefit from further …show more content…
The judge presiding over the conference was an experienced trial attorney before being elected to the bench. Further, she has presided over several hundred trials since 1995. Therefore, she has unparalleled knowledge regarding which factors make the most powerful impact on juries and she is aware the one of the most important considerations in a trial is whether the jury likes a party. It is somewhat logical if you compare it to everyday life. If you like someone, you are more likely to believe her. However, if you are not fond of her, it is harder for you to trust that individual. Hence, the demeanor of the parties themselves is usually the most important consideration at trial. As a consequence, whether a party is likeable has a direct and substantial impact on the value of a case. Therefore, a party’s appearance at the settlement conference is also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exhibit 16.5 is a final pretrial order for the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case on the pretrial order is Austin Bennaza vs Buddy Smith. The notice states stipulations and statements that deal with the case. It details each parties current state as well as their part in the case. It states what each party owes the other in dealing with the case. It also states how long the trial should take. It allocates specific time to each task associated with the case. The document needs to be prepared and submitted jointly by opposing trial counsel. The pretrial order also needs to be signed by the pretrial judge.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the matter is not resolved at such a meeting, a further meeting will be…

    • 1837 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parties were each represented throughout this action by independent legal counsel of their choice; it is therefore…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A conference is a private meeting of the nine Justices by themselves; the public and the Justices' clerks are excluded. If four Justices vote to grant the petition, the case proceeds to the briefing stage; otherwise, the case ends.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    That is why counsel wanted a continuance to further investigate on the case. The judge did not understand much of what the defendant’s counsel was trying to argue because she was not prepared. The defendant’s counsel was stating random objections to the sentence but did not have substantial evidence as to why she was making her claims. She was also stalling throughout the hearing by elongating the points she was making. She was very redundant as well.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    COMMLAW LAW ASSIGNMENT

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Please remember that the trial will begin with an opening statement given by the plaintiff, then the plaintiff will begin direct examination of witnesses (this is where the plaintiff and his/her witnesses will be permitted to explain the plaintiff’s position on the issues). The defendant will then be able to…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I'm not sure what background information you are supposed to know on this. Certainly any discord among the jurors makes tension. You need a collective jury to to hand down a verdict. These jurors are hot, tired, and upset. A group will naturally look favourably to strong evidence that will end the trial. Any discord could convince other jurors to change their mind and shift the group dynamics.…

    • 5854 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within Dostoyevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor and Herman Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener are expressive figures facing problems of an existential nature. Consumed by an inability to find purpose in life, their actions and reactions become characterized by absurd and illogical streaks. The characters begin to align with the ideas surrounding existentialism, most notably with the “sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world." As they attempt to understand their place in the world, the determination of these characters is as thrilling as it is tragic. With the underlying flight or fight approach to survival revealed, these characters give us a rare, yet familiar insight into the impact of disenchantment…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once the briefs are filed will schedule an oral argument at which counsel for both parties will have an opportunity to briefly outline their decisions and answer questions from the court.…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judge in the beginning of the movie showed some non verbal behavior, which is sending a message without using words but things like facial expressions and body movements. The judge in the beginning was hunched over meaning he was not very alert and seemed to be a passive man. The foreman is supposed to be the leader of the jury’s and according to his behaviors he is. He communicates well which is a key role to being a leader. The foreman functions as a leader because he listens well and also tries to give out ideas to the rest of the jurors. He has the ability to look at the situation in other perspectives. In making these hard decisions the jurors need to have perception checks, to make sure they are not jumping to any conclusions. This is the life of a kid and their decision depends on his life. The conflicts that arise in the jurors room where productive to the situation at hand. The conflicts were solved in a good manner and beneficial to the case and getting everyone to feel confident about whether the kid was guilty or not. The jurors had assumptions about “those people” and “slums” which influenced the way they felt about the case. Their assumptions about those things influenced the way they thought about the case initially, the perception of the facts was altered because of having some type of bias. The juror’s assumptions had to do with the cultural and social diversity of the jury. The jurors based on how they lived their life, thought differently from the ones who were different from them based on the way they lived their lives. There were a lot of details to the case, and some jurors did not quite remember what others did. Some jurors remembered things that others did not due to selective…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    fair trial and wants to “talk this thing out”. A fair trial that everyone is entitled to. Juror 8th is in contrast…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a traditional litigation the process is very structured. Usually a lawyer is needed to represent then the process will proceed through the judicial system. A judge and jury will render an unpredictable ruling based on the law rather than justice. An alternative dispute resolution is much more flexible. In the alternative dispute resolution parties can select a neutral decision maker with specific expertise pertaining to the dispute. The procedure and format also can be agreed upon by both parties.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge at trial should share the same power equal to the jury and altogether come to a…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    head

    • 2515 Words
    • 18 Pages

    These materials were produced by the Teaching and Learning Unit, University of Melbourne. The University of Sydney…

    • 2515 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays